Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Similar to what you've said here, just get drafting up based on what's already been sent. The mentions of the CRA2015 will be key. post your draft up here and we can help tweak.
    • Yes, well done. If you have a look at post 9 of dbuk2000's thread there are links to other cases featured on the Parking Prankster's site  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466177-ukpc-2x-windscreen-pncs-claimform-forgot-permit-appealed-res-parking-my-own-space-east-croft-house-86-northolt-road-south-harrow-ha2-0es-claim-dismissed/#comments Also have a read of dbuk2000's Witness Statement.  
    • PDF's now merged above... Plus extra redaction!
    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Koko vs Marks & Spencer


kokomar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have printed of the SAR for M & S and will post it tomorrow recorded of course. From what I gather having had a bit of a surf these people are not playing our game and we can't have that. I owe them about £400 and I would guess they have taken about £300 in "letter charges" over the years. All automated letters of course! Not sure about this one but it's worth a go. Back in 41 days to send prelim letter, but obviously will update this if I actually get a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no reason why not. Good Luck. Keep us updated.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I never! Should have updated this immediately but forgot. On 19th Sept a very nice lady phoned to ask if I'd be OK with just a list of charges to reclaim from instead of the full SAR docs. I said tvm but actually I want to check out the PPI as well which keeps mysteriously appearing on my statements, even though they've known for years that a. I'm self-employed, b. I never asked for it and c. over the years I must have complained about the damn thing a zillion times (it's back on again now).

I expected the tone to deteriorate but actually she was very pleasant and said simply "That's OK dear you'll need the whole lot then. I'll get on with it." Wow. Believe it when I see it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

SAR info arrived this morning. 19 days well done M&S! The account has been held since 1996.

 

1. They have only sent statements dating back to 4/10/01 ie five years worth.

 

.... Will write and ask for the extra year for letter charges purposes but wanted FULL disclosure so I could check on the PPI over the years as I'm sure I cancelled it around Apr 00. It appears on all the statements they've sent me in the SAR.

 

2. They have sent records of telephone calls going back to aug 03 but only those made TO me. There are also calls made to them BY me but only for the last 6 months. eg. they managed to correctly change my address in Nov 03 without speaking to me (I remember I rang them to do this).

 

PPI is going to be complicated I can feel it in my bones. Going to write back to them tonight, will post my efforts here later.

 

Koko

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK letter written and goes as follows:

 

M&SFS etc

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

Further to your telephone call on 19th September and subsequent letter dated 3rd October 2006 enclosing a copy of my personal data held by M&SFS. Firstly thank you for the time obviously spent making notations to allow for easier interpretation of the information you have provided, it is much appreciated.

I’m afraid I write with queries.

  • The transaction reports you have supplied begin at 11th October 2001. Could you please supply this information from the opening date of the account, 14th October 1996 to 11th October 2001.
  • The notations of verbal correspondence you have supplied begin at 19th August 2003 and don’t seem to include any of the telephone calls I have made to yourselves over the years, other than those made in the last six months. Could you please supply the notations of correspondence (verbal and written) from the opening date of the account, 14th October 1996 to 19th August 2003.

If you no longer hold the above data and therefore cannot supply it, please advise me of this in writing.

I feel at this point it may help you if I explain why this information is so important to me. With respect to the Payment Protection Insurance applied to my account, at the time of opening the account I was working as a secretarial temp, and therefore would not have been able to claim on this policy had I tried to. Having now seen the original application form, I consider that this policy was mis-sold to me. In addition in April 2000 I became self-employed. At this time I opened a business account and took out a protection policy with my bank to cover me in the event of illness, as I was informed that it was particularly hard to claim on any policy for loss of earnings or unemployment when self-employed. I advised both you and my credit card company of this by telephone and asked for the payment protection to be removed, and was assured that it would be. At this point I was unaware that I had already made payments for four years on a policy on which it was doubtful that I could make a claim.

I have also recently discovered that the regime of fees which M&SFS have been applying to my account in relation to late or non-payment fees, described on your statements as “letter charges”, are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations. I think it doubtful that I would have incurred these charges prior to 11th October 2001, however this is another reason for my request.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter, I look forward to receiving your reply.

Yours sincerely, Koko

Any comments would be really appreciated ! Is there anyone else dealing with M&S at the mo, all the threads I've read seem to have dried up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had a reply today from M & S.

 

Thank you for your recent letter which I acknowledge on behalf of the Customer Relations Team.

 

I hope to respond to your complaint within the next ten working days. I apologise for any inconvenience caused.

 

I am also obliged to let you know of Marks & Spencer Money's complaint handling procedures and I enclose a copy of our "How we can help you" leaflet that sets out the relevant details for you.

 

Once again thank you for taking the time to write. I am only sorry it has been necessary for you to do so.

 

Well she couldn't have been more polite but even so the deadline for the SAR runs out on Monday! I haven't formally made a complaint yet unless you count complaining that they haven't fulfilled their obligations under the D P Act!

 

Need to have a think about my response. Might just wait the 10 days and see what they come up with. Uuummmmm.

 

Koko

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have all of my information and just need to work out the PPI total that they have charged me. I am assuming that I will need to send the standard letter but change the wording from charges and interest to PPI? Is that what you are doing Koko?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...