Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP and CRa file entry for Welcome debt


liam.baz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys/girls

 

im new to this so here goes,

 

I had a loan with welcome finance that wasn't paid back, it was removed from my credit file in March 2014.

 

i have just check my credit file again and it seems the same debt is on again

as a default this time with MKDP LLP,

 

i called them to see what was going on and

 

they said i have made a payment of £15 in 2010 which i certainly didn't,

 

so i asked them how it was made and to who,

 

they told me they only have it down as a transfer,no bank details ect. so

 

i called the credit agency and they said if i would of made this payment it would have to be reported to them

and of this was the case why was it removed this year if i acknowledged the debt back in 2010??

 

it doesn't make sense and no one has any answers for me.

Edited by liam.baz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again, lying and cheating companies making false payments to stop the Statute Barred regulation taking effect.

 

 

Welcome Liam

 

 

Can you tell us more about the debt please, especially the date it was started, the date you last made a payment ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,

 

£3000 loan taken in 2006 and a few payments was made before i moved away,

 

for some reason i was reported to checkmyfile until march 2014 and removed,

 

this debt was passed to MKDP llp 18/5/14

 

but they claim a payment of £15 was made to welcome in 2010,

 

but why wasn't this reported to credit agency?

and why was it removed?

 

if that was the case?

 

i called welcome to check this and they said they have a payment made in April 2010 of £15

but no idea how it was made only says transfer, no bank details ect,

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar time to welcome me thinks.

 

just remember that recently ALL welcome finance debts

were recently removed from CRa files for nearly everyone 'en mass'.

 

MDKP would have probably purchased the debt

and seeing the info

that it was not SB'd

 

have put it back up.

 

I would pers be staying off the phone now

 

writing ONLY

 

you need a written data trail.

 

you could put MKDP to strict proof

as to when how who where on that payment

 

the info will exist

including the account number it was transferred from.

 

i'd get a CCA request of to MKDP too do NOT sign it

 

as for the SAR to welcome

 

if you have moved

inc the old addresses and a copy of your current CTAX bill

 

sign the SAR.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi mate, thanks for the reply, im a little lost tho, they don't have my new address didn't really want them to have it, although they will need it if im going to be sending letters, i really have no idea as what im putting in the letter?

can the same default be issued twice as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as the original default date does not change.

 

if your new address is on your credit file

they'll have it already

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the default date on the file is now 18/5/14

 

when they originally told me a payment was made in 2010 (April) this is why im confused,

 

the bit i cant understand is if i made a payment in 2010

 

why was the debt removed from the file??

 

and why was the payment not recorded with the agency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would await the welcome sar return as in post 4 instructions

 

I would suspect? you are looking at the 'update date'

not the defaulted date?

 

look on your old cra file printouts

there should be a defaulted date under welcome in the SUMMARY line

 

that should be the same as the MKDP entry.

 

as for why it vanished under welcome, that's explained above.

 

as for why the cra file does not carry the payment

I think more will come out toward this under the SAR.

 

write a letter to MKDP

 

head the letter

I do not ack any debt to your or your client.

 

inform them you are unwilling to discuss the matter further until

the SAr return from welcome finance

AND their return of the CCA request.

 

also might be an idea to get a cra report from another provider too.

 

try noddle

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have used Experian, checkmyfile and noodle, it was reported as a default 18/5/14 with a red 8 next to it,

 

when i checked in march this year is said it was reported until march 2014 and then removed in Aprils report,

 

there are 2 different dates,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it is about time people started complaining to the FCA about these Ghost payments.

 

The SAR response should be interesting.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i apologies, default date 20/8/2013 reported until 20/08/2019

 

account opened Feb 06

 

when i contacted checkmyfile they said the last payment was 2008 thats why it was removed in 2014,

 

therefore i hadn't acknowledged the debt,

Link to post
Share on other sites

there must have been a defaulted date on it from the welcome days

what was that?

 

a debt does not get removed from a cra 'just because' you've not paid in 6yrs [sb date]

 

tere wold have to have been a default date from that period

or

as I said before

it got removed under the general sweep of all welcome debts reported by welcome.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say the debt was previously shown on an old CRa printout?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then that would p'haps nicely tally with 6yrs

 

the ICO say:

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return.

.

however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

 

 

...................

 

so having now clarified that one...

 

you can DEMAND the debt placed by MKDP is TOTALLY REMOVED.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the sar will confirm this

 

you need to await hat

then send a copy of th evidence to MKDP

 

simply demanding they removed the account forthwith

else your complaint to the ICO will be in the post within 14 working days.

 

still CCA them separately mind.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a call from MKDP and they said they will remove the default as welcome sent them the wrong default date, although they are still saying a payment was made in April 2010, why would they remove the default if this payment was made when they say it was, makes no sense still, glad its being removed but by the sounds of it they will be still chasing me? is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you asked for everything in wrtiting as what they said over the phone has no standing what so ever, they will prob deny it

 

Cannot stress enough do not talk to dcas over the phone ever period fullstop :D

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes correct.

 

if they are claiming a phantom payment

 

put them to strict proof

 

how

by whom

when

what bank

by what method

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...