Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Do I have a regulated agreement or not?


mike00
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've just read the OFT Document, "Consumer credit - regulated and exempt agreements".

 

It states:

 

3.4 The Act does not regulate:

  • a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement for fixed-sum credit, under which the total number of repayments of credit does not exceed four, and those payments are required to be made within a period not exceeding 12 months beginning with the date of the agreement (for example, an annual gym membership payable in quarterly instalments)

My agreement with Safeloans is headed, "Fixed Sum Loan Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974". And contains:

Duration of Credit Agreement: 1 months

Amount of Credit: £200.00

Timing of repayments: The Total Amount Payable is to be repaid in 1 monthly instalments by debit card on

the payment dates show below:

 

 

Could somebody advise? Basically I need to know whether charges and interest beyond the original capital and interest are fair and enforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement must state the amount lent and the interest payable and the total to be paid back including interest.

It should also state the penalty for missed payments and late charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

raydetinu, it has all of those things:

 

APR 2365.00%. The APR is calculated on the assumption that you borrow the amount of credit shown above

and repay over 1 repayment instalments as shown below.

 

a) We will charge you the sum of £7.50 for each nonstatutory

arrears letter (to a maximum of 3 arrears letters);

b) We will charge you £7.50 for each Retain Card letter (when the bank stops your card payments with the

status "Retain Card")

c) You will be charged £12.00 each time payment is missed or unpaid on the scheduled due date(s);

d) You will be charged a fee of £30.00 if you fail to pay your account and the account is referred to a

Collections specialist

e) You must pay us any reasonable expenses and costs that we may incur in tracing you if you move address

without first notifying us;

f) In addition, you must pay us any reasonable expenses and costs we may incur in taking other steps to

enforce our rights against you under this credit agreement.

 

Interest for late payment: You will be charged default interest for the period you are in arrears at a rate of 1%

per day on any outstanding balance applying to this agreement from the date payment falls due until payment

is made.

 

I keep reading on CAG that PDL agreements aren't regulated; and they can't enforce the unfair interest and charges after the fixed term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDL agreements are regulated under the Consumer Credit act.

 

Going by your last post mike,

 

a is unlawful and unenforceable

b is the same

c is the same

D is valid IF they class this as the default fee. If they don't, then again, unenforceable.

e is unlawful and unenforceable.

f is valid in a way. It depends on the "reasonable expenses and costs" and what they consider to be reasonable and what they attribute the costs to.

 

g is dodgy. Techincally they cannot charge it as it is not contracted interest and can be seen as a penalty charge. It can be seen as unjustly enriching themselves as well. However, to my knowledge, nobody has challenged it yet in court.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, renegadeimp. Your comments echo what I've read around here. I will be arguing against these charges and interest in court, and need help to better understand my position. What legislation makes them unlawful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt argue against them in court, as a judge wont care or more so, have the time to delve into the depths of consumer law.

 

You need to be adamant right from the start that the charges are unlawful and amount to penalty charges. The PDL's already know this, but will still try and pressure you to give in and accept them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what to do then, as the majority of the claim is interest and charges? More than double what I actually owe. Should I just quickly state that I think they're unfair/unlawful, move on, and hope the judge sides with me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you gotten a FULL breakdown of account, and demanded they explain what each charge was attributed to?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in receipt of their lousy 'Statement of Account' which lists these simply as 'Charge' and 'Fee Interest'. Charges make up £281.50 including two charges for £75. 'Fee Interest' totals £64.

 

I guess it's time to fire off another SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to DEMAND a full and itemised breakdown of account and specifically request that they explain what each charge is attributed to and how they arrived at that amount. You do not need a sar for this as it is a basic legal right to have a full itemised statement of account for any financial product/loan you have.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...