Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repayment offers - what %age is reasonable?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In the next few months, I am hoping to be able to offer settlements to try and close some of my debts out, particularly where there are CCJs and/or charges on the property, so that we can remortgage, hopefully with a ‘normal’ lender. We are currently trapped in an interest only mortgage and need to get a different package, but these things effectively stop us doing so.

We are currently paying several creditors, either by court order or by mutual agreement, various fixed sums per month ranging from £5 to £40, and two companies have a charge on our house.

Some of the payments under court order are due to go on until way after we are dead, assuming we don’t live to be 130! So they are unlikely to get the debt repaid.

What I’m wondering is, how does one go about making offers of repayment, if one can only offer a fraction of the whole?

Say, if I am paying a £10K sum at £10 a month. That adds up to 1000 months or 83 years! If I offered the creditor a one-off payment of £1K in settlement, would I be being ridiculous? It seems they could do a lot more with a grand than with a drip-feed of a tenner a month until I die (I’m in my early 50s).

And, if they took my grand in final settlement, could I then get CCJs and charges removed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Full & Final Settlements, need to be handled very carefully as you could find any remaining balances coming back to bite you later.

 

With those debts that are subject to CCJs the judgement will remain a matter of public record for six years from the judgement date paid off or not.

 

You will almost certainly be asked with any type of mortgage app if you have had any CCJs (usually in the last years).

Also any lender will these days be looking at an absolute minimum of good to excellent credit management of 3 years and for mortgages probably longer.

 

To get proper advice for this you need to list the debts, their status (CCJ/CCJ and Charging order/charging order/arrangement to pay with creditor or a DCA.

The amount outstanding, the companies concerned.

 

With 'straight forward' debt with creditor or a DCA one would look to making an opening offer of 10-15% of the outstanding balance plus it being conditional on the remaining balance not being sold on to any 3rd party.

 

I have to be upfront here this will be a long hard slog especially with the CCJs.

 

What is the full amount of your delinquent debt?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

May be worth making a file for each debt, with all the data for each one, amount o/s default date / CCJs post them here it will be easier to advise on where to start and what to offer.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I'll do a spreadsheet. Might take a bit of time but I'll be back on here once it's done.

 

OK Yog.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, after much shuffling of paperwork and organising of files, I have got things in some kind of order. Not pretty reading, although it represents a bad time in both my life and my wife’s (largely before we met).

In total, including those debts where the creditors have not been in touch for a few years, we jointly owe £51K. Terrifying, but meh, I’m used to it now.

We have 2 CCJ’s, both in my wife’s name, with Lloyds TSB and Link Financial. Both of these also have a charge on our house. There are payment arrangements on both these, which will remain in effect for many, many years.

I have 2 other payment arrangements, with Cabot and CL Finance, for small sums each month, which are fixed (non reviewable) and will go on for decades, well beyond my lifespan. There is no CCJ on these.

Of the remainder, these are all in dispute. All have had s78 letters sent, either to the current owner of the debt, or (usually) to the OC or a previous DCA. Most have not responded and of those that have, two have provided copy CAs (or at least signed application forms). Most are dormant however, with no contact in the last 2-4 years.

So it is the CCJs I am most concerned with (total £17k), meaning LTSB and Link. How to approach them, and what is realistic? We have a limited sum to play with but it’s an opportunity to get some debt off our backs and get out of our mortgage trap.

If they will play ball, then there are the other ones where we have fixed payment arrangements but no CCJs. As these payments are paltry and endless, surely they’d jump at a chunk of money? But let’s look at the important ones first: LTSB and Link.

Oh and, if a creditor accepts a full and final settlement, does that mean we can get the charge removed from the house?

Oh and one very last thing! Is it still possible and worthwhile trying to reclaim bank charges and PPI from old bank accounts? I had 12 years of PPI payments on a previous mortgage with HSBC and Bradford & Bingley before them. No idea how to go about it but a debt adviser suggested we might be able to get back a substantial sum, which would help clear more of these debts.

Edited by Yog sothoth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Yog,

 

Let's go to your last paragraph first.

 

Bank charges ( current accounts) are no longer open to reclaim since the OFT lost the landmark test case on this.

Penalty Charges on Credit Cards and loans are reclaimable still so the should be reclaimed before considering any full & final repayment offers or repayment plans.

 

PPI on CCs on Loans most certainly reclaimable if misssold.

 

There are some site team members who are superb at helping with these reclaims if you post up the details of the accounts and the PPI details I know they can help you and with no greedy claims company taking a slice.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right Brigadier, I am engaged in a search for PPI details but in the meantime, I need to get cracking with these offers.

 

Just hypothetically, let's say I have approximately £10k to play with, to try and pay my creditors off. based on what I posted above, where should I start and how should I go about it? I presume there's a right way and several wrong ways?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks. I really do need to make a start with these companies, so any help would be very gratefully received.

 

Should I approach each creditor one at a time, and if so, what should I offer them?

 

Obviously I want the ones with a charge on the house and a CCJ sorting first, as they are preventing us ever remortgaging. So please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...