Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

direct auto charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, having a bit of a problem with Direct Auto. I am completely up to date with my monthly payments, however, a couple may have been a few days late. They are now sending me letters at £15.00 a time to tell me my account is in arrears. Surely these fees for letters carry the same principle as bank charges and are penalty charges, not enforcable in consumer contracts. Just wondering if anyone has challenged these £15.00 fees and what the outcome may have been. Not sure whether to pay now to stop the threats then pursue these unfair charges, or write now to say I won't pay their unlawful charges.

 

Grateful for any advice.

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm in the same position, was late with one payment couple of months ago and they are sending me about 2 letters every week charging me £15 a time. I've told them to bolt, these charges are unlawful and I won't be paying them!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,thanks for the quick responses. I now have another letter dated 21/6 (and another £15.00 fee of course). This letter says "Do not ignore this final attempt to allow us to prevent further action being taken". Out of interst Cazpoppies, what was their response to your refusal to pay?

 

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Paul,

 

Can't say that I've had any response really, I called them and told them and they said they would put a note on my account but I've now had 6 from them and 3 letters I've sent them saying that I'm not paying them.

My account is now up to date as far as paying for the car is concerned and I'm going to ignore there charges. I no longer accept their telephone calls. (average of 6 to house and 6 to mobile every day)

 

I'm not sure that burying my head in the sand is the right way to go about this but the way I see it is that they are charging me for being in arrears but it is their charges that have put me in this position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just sent them a letter stating their charges are unlawful and requesting for all charges to be removed. Now I will await their response.

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two letters received today from Direct Auto. The first one I opened as follows;

 

Thank you for your letter received today.

In accordance with our terms and conditions (section 5 Indemnity) fees are charged for each letter sent relating to an overdue payment. However as a gesture of goodwill in this instance we have removed one of the charges.

 

Well, in my opinion, the fact that their charges are in accordance with their terms and conditions doesn't make them lawful. Oh, and the second letter I received today? Another arrears letter and another charge! So much for their goodwill!

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having received a reply from Direct auto stating that their fees are in accordance with their terms and conditions, I have written back quoting their terms and conditions to them.

 

Section 5 indemnity 5.2 costs REASONABLY incurred by us in preparing and sending reminders, termination and demand letters, default notices, statements of account, copy documents, settlement quotations or otherwise...

 

I await their reply, and more reminder letters to add to the amount that they already claim that I owe.

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be interesting to hear their response to that.

Must admit I haven't heard anything more from them since I told them to get lost and to stop calling me but I'm sure that they will still pursue me for the charges they have applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well after a couple of months of continued £15.00 charges, maybe it's time to start the same process as we are using for our bank charges. I haven't paid any of these charges, so could send a preliminary request for removal of charges, rather than repayment.

Has anyone else challenged these charges yet, and what has been the response. The only response I have received to my communications is 'in accordance with our terms and conditions'.

They are also phoning several times every day.(I don't answer!) Can I ask them not to contact me by phone, am I right in thinking they're are breaking a law if they then continue to do so?

 

cheers, Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bakedalasker, I now have two letters ready to go, a request for removal of charges (adapted from 'refund' letter, as I've not actually paid any of their £15.00 charges, despite their threats!) and also a demand for telephone calls to stop.

 

cheers, Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received a response to my letter regarding phonecalls, however it just says that Mr. Plowman is out of the office until mid-October and my letter has been passed on to the Chief Operations officer, Mr Gilhooley who will respond to me direct.

 

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, the following letter arrived today, a little worrying at first but on checking back, I found that I received exactly the same letter on 4th July.

 

Dear saddler10,

current arrears £310.00

 

Despite recent reminders, payment on your account remains overdue. We now require immediate payment of the arrears.

 

If you are unable to make this payment, you should contact us as a matter of urgency on the number above.

 

May we remind you that continued failure to make payment on your account will lead to us taking further action, and may result in your vehicle being repossessed.

 

Please do not ignore this reminder, it is not in your interests to do so.

 

Well the £310.00 is all charges so I won't be paying. When they sent the same letter in July they took no further action, will they now?

 

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saddler10,

 

My fear here is that they will start the process to take action. DAF are trying their best to bring to a close the YCC saga. Its been Providents, the owners of DAF, biggest mistake and they want rid. We are hearing of the smallest reason to repossess clients cars and from that we are assuming they want it all bringing to a quick end.

 

I'm afraid they will try and repossess your car, chase you for the remaining amount of your agreement then after a very short time when they have got nowhere with you will sell the debt on to a low life DCA. I say low life because anyone gaining from the YCC saga is just that. Thats my opinion.

 

Also the fact that you feel you have a claim regarding these charges DAF will not look at it that way and will put the emphasise on you to prove it. Expect a default notice through the letter box then the process has started.

 

My advice to you is to seek legal advice on this. It is not clear how long you have had the car with DAF or what you took out with them. So its difficult to give you a rough idea how much they would chase you for. If you are an average case it could quite easily be in the thousands.

 

Not too sure if you have studied our site www.saynotoyes.co.uk but we have loads of cases just like yours. We also know we have the right channels to advise our users to go down. A majority of our users who have taken our advise have had their debts "set aside" or at least a vast reduction to pay to what DAF chase for.

 

Hope to see you there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers Bakedalasker, I have visited your site. I have already used youtr template for intended court action, the deadline for which expires shortly. You also have a letter there for 'formally putting the account in dispute'. Should I use that to prevent further action by them. I have had the car (from Yes car credit) since April 2004.

 

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Saddler10,

 

You have not received a default notice or any official dispute letter. At present all you have received is a "warning" letter.

 

Preparation is the word here in case you are forced to go down this road. As this is not a matter of urgency yet my advice to you hear is to seek legal advice from the CAB. You took out the contract with YCC when the way they executed their agreements where wrong. If you ask to speak to a specialist advisor at the CAB they will be able to inform you if you have a case if the need arises.

 

DAF might refund your charges or they might default you or do nothing. Best to be prepared for the worse case scenarios which in this case would be the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hi guys - is there any progress on this? I have a friend who is having problems with DAF. We would liketo make a claim - thinking of sending a LBA.

 

 

Hi Steven, I sent a request for removal of charges at the end of September as well as a demand for telephone calls to stop. Up until this point they had been adding £15.00 charges to my account on a regular basis, totalling £310.00. Since requesting the removal of charges and many letters telling them that their charges are unlawful, I have not had any additional charges added to my account and have not been chased for the £310.00.

 

Their response regarding the charges being unlawful was 'in accordance with our terms and conditions (section 5 indemnity).

 

"Section 5 indemnity 5.2 costs reasonably incurred by us in preparing and sending reminders, termination and demand letters, default notices, statements of account, copy documents, settlement quotations or otherwise..."

 

The key word here is 'reasonably'. I asked them to demonstrate how £15.00 represents costs reasonably incurred, and, of course, they could not.

 

Cheers, Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Do you intend to claim the unlawful charges back?

 

 

Hi Steven, I never actually paid the charges as i was aware that they were unlawful, therefore when I wrote to them i was for the removal of charges from the account rather than refund. If I had paid them and then discovered they were unlawful, I would certainly be claiming them back.

 

Paul

Alliance & Leicester, £2944.66 settled in full, donation made!!!

 

Capitol One (Partner), £475.01 settled in full, donation made!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you check if they were calculating interest on your unlawful charges?

I bet they were whether you paid them or not.Personally I think a S.A.R Request is the best avenue and also request how they have calculated the interest on your account and whether it has included the penalties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...