Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CAG CRA S.A.R Club


sosumi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just where in the legislation do we actually give our express written permission for Experian et al to share our personal Data. I certainly never did yet they seem quite happy to pass it to any ****** from their friends in the DCAs to use for whatever purpose. Its not the first time a DCA has threatented to DEFAULT me because ''WE CAN''

 

 

BARSTEWARDS the lot of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It looks like our fiends (sic) at Experian are going to very busy dealing with SARS over the next couple of weeks. Just think if every member of CAG applied at once for what we are LEGALLY entitled to do. They may not have time to pass on all the information to all their mates in the DCAs

Link to post
Share on other sites

lolly, there is NO evidence that the CRA's actively pass our information to the DCA's, but it is known that the DCA's trawl the CRA's records.

No forgetting of course that Experian is owned by a DCA.

 

A conflict of interest if ever their was one:evil:

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

I am awaiting junk mail then,as i only applied a week or so ago, let you know what companies contact me (might be of interest).Not ready for a week or so yet to do S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as have got some serious studying to do before Friday as some of you know.

Cheers for all help

It will be very interesting to see what arrives in the post ober the next few weeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the SAR to Experian is a brilliant idea. It should provide piles more information than any Credit check. I would suugest adding a paragraph requesting details of each and every time someone has accessed your file whether in writing or by telephone. I feel that Experian under the terms of the DPA will be obliged to supply this information. Similarly they should be legally obliged to say who they have passed your information on to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now just entered a battle with lowell and I'd normally be scared but because of this site I am quite enjoying their pathetic attempts to get me to pay!

Clownells are a penalty kick to deal with. They follow a set pattern and are easy to deal with. When they get fed up with you they will pass your file over to the next desk called Hampton ilLegal and if they fail to scare you they will they pass it to another bunch of no-hopers who go under the wonderful name of Red Debt. All letters from the same bunch of losers

 

A CCA or in your case a Statute Barred letter will see them off but have some fun with them first

Link to post
Share on other sites

All banking institutions and CRA agencies as well as DCA’s work hand in hand. The government have no control over CRA because they are private organisations and DCA’s spread their tentacles’ wide and far.

 

DCA’s are allowed to get away with such bad practices and even down right lying and cheating which is practically the same as fraud in my opinion. The only way all this DATA about is will be remotely protected is for the government to over the control of it but I do cannot see that happening and therefore we are all at the mercy of DCA’s sharks.

 

Proposals are now being made for us all the UK residents and even visitors to this country for their DNA to go on a central data computer. Can you imagine a big burly DCA chap on your doorstep asking you to spit into a plastic bag? Then again you can always miss when spitting into their bag and direct it to the DCA chap face. Do you thing that would get rid of the leaches.:-x

The easiest way to get rid of a DCA doorstepper is to tell them to leave your property. If they refuse you can either

1. Use reasonable minimum force to remove them or

2. Telephone the boys in blue and report a breach of the peace and they will move them for you

 

It should be remembered that DCA doorsteppers have NO LEGAL RIGHTS whatsoever

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The SAR should make them supply ALL details they hold on you whether contained on their computers or not. It also requests details of telephone calls, written notes and details of whom they passed your information to as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:

. If you are in deep trouble the collector is likely to recognise you have a few debts and are less likely to cough up so they wont chase you as hard. Try telling that to thos on here who have Debt Collectors tell them to sell clothes and furniture to satisfy their GREED. Tell that to people on here who have been told to borrow the money to pay off the GREEDY debt collectors. Tell that to the people on here who have been told they will be made BANKRUPT by a GREEDY DCA. Tell that to the people on here who get thirty phone calls a day demandoing payment in full.

 

I advise anyone to look into a CRA before making them a scape goat. They exist to hold data centrally at the bequest of lenders so they can make better decisions. They do not own or create the data and are subject to SCOR rules and the Data protection act. . Data Protection Act states that data can only be used in ways described to the individual at point of collection. Any data they have on you is via consent you gave when applying for credit

Then ists probably a mere coincidence when some of us apply for our files from the CRAs that we are innundated by offers of loans and Credit Cards and new GREDDY DCAs appear from under a stone.

 

Who do you think you are KIDDING?????????????????:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, it is done all the time. But it is not the CRA who registeres the default - they are simply the facilitator - it is the creditor company who places it on your file. However the CRA need only their client (the creditor) to state that the consumers is in arrears or in default for the record to be updated. If you discover this and it is in error and the CRA refuses to update or correct the entry (usually after speaking to their client to originally provided the data), then your next recourse is to the Information Commissioners Office with a formal complaint, supplying any evidence to support your claim.
The number of people on here who have tried in vain to get unlawful and unprovable defaults removed shows which side the CRAs chose to beleive

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of this JUNK mail comes from guarantees you fill in when you bu a new Hoover or Washing Machine or whatever. I am starting to fill my warranties in with sill names just to see if I get any letters addressed to Mrs Ann Gree XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

or Mr Juan Kerr

 

or Master Bates

 

or maybe Just plain Old Ken Maynard and according to 192.com my adress should be ...............................:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JB, yes the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) from Experian gave me all the account numbers. it's odd they don't have this on the credit report? I suppose it just shows the difference between asking (and paying £10) for a SAR, rather than £2 for the Credit Report. I wonder why they keep this back?

An SAR puts a LEGAL responsibility on them to provide EVERYTHING they have on you whereas the £2 request means they supply what they want.

 

I would be interested to know from those of you who have got their full SAR does it make any mention of passing on your information to 'interested organisation' or any requests from DCAs if not then there is something lacking and they have not fully complied.:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Thanks Buzby. :)

If you read this (it's very short to read, PDF):

'Starting in Business as a Debt Collecting Agency' - CSA

it's pretty clear that setting up isn't exactly rocket science.

£99 and you've got a Company. Here's a quote from the CSA Factsheet above:

You'd think setting up as a DCA would be more complicated than that, wouldn't you?

Seems not. Bit of dosh, a nod and a wink.:evil:

Dont forget the need to employ a few thickos as call centre threat operators. No Knowledge of the law is required

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...