Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TSC Credit Management - rotherham - outstanding rent arrears to a HA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Had a letter from these guys today fairly standard re an outstanding debt except that it says

 

"As we can assist you with the repayment of this debt by a arranging a Regulated Credit Agreement with a minimal charge for setting up the agreement....."

 

Never heard of this before anyone got any ideas about them or advice as to the best way to proceed, I would be grateful.Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First NEVER talk to these "people" on the phone as they will try and get you to agree to anything.

 

Before you even think about making any sort of acknowledgement or payment to a DCA you MUST ensure that they have the LEGAL right to collect the debt.

This is achieved by requesting a copy of the Signed, Executed Credit Agreement via a Consumer Credit Act (CCA) request.

There is a template letter to be found here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Letter N.

Is it important to start the letter:

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY in Big Bold letters.

 

It is best to send this request via recorded/special delivery as there are some inportant deadlines to observe.

 

After 12 WORKING days the "debt" is in default and stays that way until the request is complied with.

If a FURTHER month passes then the DCA has committed a summary criminal offence and the matter should be referred to Trading Standards for action.

 

I hope this clarifies some things.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Curly

 

Firstly the debt is for unpaid rent from a Housing Association long story that I would prefer not to go into so there would not have been any credit agreement to start with, so which letter do you think now please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I have posted on this before but am struggling a little bit with a company called TSC Credit Management in Rotherham,

they have recently contacted me by letter and now today they are calling my mobile every two hours re some outstanding rent arrears to a housing association.

 

Their letter says

" As we can assist you with the repayment of this debt by agreeing a Regulated Credit Agreement with a minimal charge for setting up the agreement,

it is important that you phone us immediately."

 

This concerns me dreadfully as I have never heard of this before and I am unsure as to which letter to send them,

I have no problem acknowledging the debt I admit that it is mine but I just feel like this charge thing will add to my problems.

 

As per some earlier suggestions I have not spoken to them on the phone and am quite happy to let the answer phone pick up their calls,

would be grateful if someone could give me some advice regarding this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this one on for size.

Edit as needed:

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

All further communication must be in writing as telephone calls will be ignored and logged for further action.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted this letter as I do owe the money but have just swept it all under the carpet - I am willing to pay as I have now started to sort myself out financially, any suggestions would be welcomed

Dear Sir/Madame

I am writing to you reference your later dated 17/08/2007 re my outstanding monies owed to ...................., whilst I am prepared to take full responsibility for this debt and to pay it back at a reasonable level, I am concerned by your mention of a Regulated Credit Agreement and the fact that you wish to charge me for setting up an agreement. I have spoken to Debt Advice regarding this who have suggested that this may not be entirely helpful to my present situation as it does not sound like you are offering me a way of repaying the debt just increasing the amount that I owe.

I would be grateful if you could clarify this situation for me and I would like to inform you in writing that I do not wish to be contacted at any time by telephone and insist that all communication between us is in writing. I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Yours truly,

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a DCA that is chasing you, you MUST ensure that they have the legal right to collect this debt, otherwise someone else will be along to claim you owe it to them.

 

Edit - Thanks for the vote of confidence Vander.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they are trying to do is get even more money out of you.

Say you owe £100, they would setup a "loan" at 10% APR so you'd end up paying £100 + interest.

As it stands they are unsure about enforceability, if it is at all, so they are trying to convert it into an enforceable agreement. This way if you default they can start court action against you.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I deal with them if they prove that they can collect or do I refuse, I am happy topay back the monies but it is over 2500 so would be even more money - am doing ok with money now so can afford to pay them back about 50 a month - is it worth me approaching the HA direct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they prove to YOUR satisfaction then yes, arrangement payment.

DON'T sign up to a credit agreement whatever they say as this will end up costing you more money.

If possible try and deal directly with the HA.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...