Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak must be using GBNOTnews financial planners .. GB News losses up 38% to £42.4m giving channel total deficit of £76m since launch Losses in the latest accounting period were six times greater than revenue.   Mind you, as it seems to clearly be a disinformation service and route of money to poopy MPs and hangers on ... I'm sure they dont mind (mm is that the 'Tory guv or GBNews I'm talking about?.)   GB News owner pumps in further £41mn in funding as losses widen WWW.FT.COM Vehicle backed by hedge fund tycoon Paul Marshall steps in as right-leaning broadcaster increases number of staff   GB News losses grew 38% to £42.4m in 2023 financial year - Press Gazette PRESSGAZETTE.CO.UK GB News' operating losses grew 38% to £42.4m in the year to May 2023, the business has reported in its latest Companies House...  
    • United Kingdom Debt Clock: British National Debt Grow By The Second - Commodity.com COMMODITY.COM Want to know why the UK's national debt-to-GDP ratio is increasing so rapidly? See our overview of the UK national debt and GDP figures.   The tories borrowing last year alone was " £1,780 per head of the UK’s population"
    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chidda vs. Abbey - 2nd letter sent, abbey need 4 weeks to investigate


Chidda
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6139 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

After much hassle, I finally got a list of my bank charges so I sent off my first letter requesting my money back. After 14 days no reply so sent off 2nd letter saying about going through the courts to get it back.

 

I have no had a letter from abbey saying that they have recieved my complaint and that they need 4 weeks to investigate my case.

 

So what should I do now, do they really need 4 weeks to look into it or are they using delaying tatics. Do I ring up the courts after 14 days and say I want to take them to court, quite nervous if I have too.

 

I must say its been a right pain in the arse to even get a list of my charges from the past 5 years. Even after I sent another complaint letter, I got the list through but only from the start of 2004. I found abbey to be uncoperative and Im sick and tired of ringing them up and being put through to a call centre in another country who dont have a clue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there and welcome, if you have any statements missing, email [email protected] and remind her of her obligations under the data protection act.

Ignore their letters, they are standard crap, stick to the recommended timetable and if you get stuck or need any help, we are all here waiting to help

 

take care

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got several letters from abbey saying that they are demanding all my bank cards and cheque books back and if i dont send them back they are going to send some one round to get them at my cost and they are going to register me as a bad debter and when i rang them they told me they did it months ago it is all over the charges they kept giving me so i now have 4 different court proccedings against the abbey going on

Link to post
Share on other sites

same as me edmund69, I did give mine back and when I complete my 2nd claim beyond the 6 years (after I have successfully retreived my claim from Jan 2001), I will close the account as at the moment we have stopped all our commitments both into and out of the account and frozen any interest which could be charged as we are in dispute with them and they can't charge you. Sometimes it is better to make a clean break if you can.

My inlaws have been with Yorkshire bank for more than 25 years and I have just started helping them with their claim thanks to all the advice gladly given out on this site, we have decided to go back as far as the bank has records for them, and I know what hardships they went through 15-20 years ago so I reckon with a little help they should be looking at a nice little nest egg (both retired).

It may be a long hard battle but we started the claim before the OFT test case be it by 2 days but that will not put us off, why wait for a decision which could take a year or more for judgement, atleast if everything is in place it is down to the presiding judge at which ever court to say yes or no NOT the banks as people and the press are being led to believe.

 

regards

chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got several letters from abbey saying that they are demanding all my bank cards and cheque books back and if i dont send them back they are going to send some one round to get them at my cost and they are going to register me as a bad debter and when i rang them they told me they did it months ago it is all over the charges they kept giving me so i now have 4 different court proccedings against the abbey going on

 

Did they do this because you were trying to get your charges back?

 

Getting a bit scared now, lol.

 

Also on the letter I sent (basically using the template off here), I included the part about having a bad credit rating because of the charges I recieved. If this went to court, how do I go about having my credit rating sorted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Help!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Hi Just about to send letter to ABBEY to claim back bank charges. Can I include over the six years ie it starts april 2001 or do I have to include this as a seperate claim and start initially from August 2001??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...