Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LTSB Allocation Court Stage......


minty123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya Minty

 

Try not to worry. I know its an anxious time but it will be worth it in the end :) I am sure you will hear from them soon.

 

Many of us have been in the same position, myself included.

 

We are here to give you help, advice and support, so come on here any time with any questions or concerns.

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Minty

 

Try not to worry. I know its an anxious time but it will be worth it in the end :) I am sure you will hear from them soon.

 

Many of us have been in the same position, myself included.

 

We are here to give you help, advice and support, so come on here any time with any questions or concerns.

 

Love Spiritgirl x

 

 

 

good advice, not easy.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]if my response has been of help to you, please click on my scales. thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your support

I have received a letter from their Solicitors saying that looking at entering into negotiations etc.etc. but that there was a discepancy on the amount owed could i provide a Breakdown by Charge,Date Debited,and how did i calculate interst- done this and sent to them-my original amount was slightly over what it should have been -do i need to send the Court anything to let them know the Amount is differant?

Also received letter from Court to say that they had to provide details to Court ( my local one) by a specific date of their charging practices etc......

I do not have to attend on this date ....:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.first of all the letter about sending a recently schedule is very standard at the moment and is normally followed by a settlement letter.

2. when u say slightly over - exactly how slightly

3. dont worry about informing the court just yet.

4. the letter you got from the court. can u type it up as this ounds like a disclosure notice but need to be sure

 

:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Minty, I made a mistake in addition right at the beggining, only noticed once I had done the spreadsheet, and added interest.

If its only a small amount, it will come out in the wash, ie; [problem] will correct it and settle for the amount less the over.

 

You are now in negotiations with [problem], the only time you will need to inform the court is once they have settled.

 

When is your court date? just out of interest:D

The Court is asking the Bank to disclose how they come to the amounts they charge, this is making the Banks settle early, as they do not want to disclose the fact that they are charging £30 for something that cost them as little as £2.50 to process. Its all good, nothing for you to worry about.

 

read read and read some:p more

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

remus, i wouldnt say its making the banks settle early, [problem] totaly ignored my disclosure notice and lookds like they are ignoring the judges letter saying the have until 26th july to comply otherwise their defence will be struck out

Hi christina, sorry, meant it was an attempt by the courts to make the Banks reach settlement before getting to Court.

Minty is in negotiations with [problem], so it is looking good that they are trying to sort this out before the 26th (sorry couldn't see that date).

I agree that any directions etc are totally ignored, mine too:D

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.first of all the letter about sending a recently schedule is very standard at the moment and is normally followed by a settlement letter.

2. when u say slightly over - exactly how slightly

3. dont worry about informing the court just yet.

4. the letter you got from the court. can u type it up as this ounds like a disclosure notice but need to be sure

 

:D

Hi

It was over by £600-Ooops!

Letter says-'We have been instructed to write to you as our Client is ,entirely on a without prejudice basis,and with no admission to liabiltiy,minded to enter into settlement negotiations with you but b 4 doing so we are told there apprears to be a discrepancy in what you are seeking..

We note from your pleadings that you are alleging that various deductions were made from your account over the last few years ....please provide info on '

Have provided info on specific charges as stated previously

Court date is 7th August

 

Havce to sit tight i guess.....:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...