Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
    • Just use the print option 'print to pdf' which will save a copy of email as pdf document on your device. If you lived at address as partner when the liability was not settled, then it would be Council Tax legislation they would use. This is designed to stop tenants or owners of a property resident in a property not to pay tax due, when the normal bill payee does not pay the liability due. If you want to know the exact legislation wording, suggest you search for it online, as the legislation is available to view online. If you did not live at address as partner at the time, there is no law they could use.
    • Last week, Washington announce new tariffs on Chinese imports including electric cars and solar panels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and Abbey


mapanzure
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the 06/06/7 I send a letter for data protection to abbey. they responded on the 16/06/07 giving me 6months bank statements and a schedule of paid and unpaid charges (£770 and 1321 respectively) and overdraft fees for £115.00. This schedule is from Jan 2004. Today 12/07/07 almost 36 day from initial contact I recieved a letter saying 'our reseasrch is taking longer than expected because we want to make sure a full investigation is done. If we are unable to complete our investigation before hand, we will write to you again in four weeks time to let you know how we are getting on.'

 

What should I do next it appears they are playing games asking to wait another 40 days and they have not furnitured me with all the info from when I opened the account in 2002. What is next for me now?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Sorry no-one has responded to you - I didn't see your post the first time around, so I apologise.

 

It looks like Abbey are getting their knickers in a twist - again! - as this is usually the standard reply to the Preliminary letter requesting your charges back!!

 

I take it the 40 days for the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) is almost up? In which case you can hit them for Non-Compliance; have a look here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

I don't know much about this route unfortunately, but hopefully all the info should be in the link.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Best regards

 

Jo xx

 

Just found this address for you if it helps:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/105208-abbey-contacts.html

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed [email protected] and found her quite helpful, she is in the data protection department which deals with the statements etc. apparantly all the earlier statements come from Bradford, which take a little longer to come through (they say this like they are talking about OUter Mongolia)

Good luck

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emailed Sheena but she was replied saying---'I have forwarded your query onto the appropriate business area handling the requests for Abbey. Our records do show that the historical information was sent out to you on the 20 June 2007. As it's clear that you have not received this data, I've asked them to re-issue the transactional information out to you as soon as possible.

I hope you receive the data safely in the very near future'

S0 I am still waiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Next you send Abbey letter before action ( see template letter on here) with a copy of your spreadsheet once you have done it. Do not add interest at this stage. Send both special delivery that way you can use post office track and trace and know they have recieved it. Then sit down have a coffee and wait 14 days, unless you hear from Abbey before hand.

All advice given is without any liability and has been picked up from my own experiences.

Never give up hope - Life is to short.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before the LBA (letter before action) send this letter, the LBA is the one that you send 14 days later.

But yes! Have the coffee and sticky bun and be very, very patient!!!

Absolutely ditto to the advice about sending your letter recorded/special delivery, you need proof...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/671-2-letter-preliminary-approach.html

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...