Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
    • DX, worth mentioning? I take it that you refer to after ,65 loan is written off clause. I thought that after the problems I had at deferment (/no proof of income satisfied them, and I could not afford an accountant) after they stopped pestering that they had decided that the age related clause  had kicked in. As I said, its time to hit back with SB letter.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Deitus Vs Citicards


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Ladies and Gents,

 

I have received my court date and am in the process of sorting out my court bundle. It's almost complete but does anyone know where I can get a decent transcript from the Whistleblower documentary that I might include? Is it worth doing this or am I barking up the wrong tree?

 

I am due in court on 10th July and have until Tuesday next week to supply my documents to the court so I will be mailing them tonight or early tomorrow.

 

Do Citi have to supply me with similar documentation bundle during this time or is this just on the side of the claimant and I simply receive the defense?

 

Just a couple of nagging little questions :)

 

Hopefully some of you may know and be able to assist. Am getting nervous now....feeling somewhat well out of my depth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

citi should seen you a court bundle too. although i had to write to get mine!!

if you pm gizmo111 she may be able to help with your bundle and what to include.

Halifax

Settled in Full

Cap One

Settled in Full

Citi Card

Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just got back from court and I think it went fairly well. Judge was fairly down to earth and encouraged me despite my fairly obvious nerves. I got an order for full disclosure within 21 days. Anyone know what happens now or has received data from Citi? Am I to expect a ream of accountancy data that I have no hope of understanding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from court and I think it went fairly well. Judge was fairly down to earth and encouraged me despite my fairly obvious nerves. I got an order for full disclosure within 21 days. Anyone know what happens now or has received data from Citi? Am I to expect a ream of accountancy data that I have no hope of understanding?

 

 

 

Excellent, sounds like you got a nice judge, is there anything for you to comply with on the disclosure order? on mine I had to supply the court and citi with a list of charges, a copy of statements showing charges, copies of relevent laws i was relying on and a statement of evidence, just waiting to see if citi comply, their 14 days are up on the 17th July..

Best of luck..GC

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, All the order said was that Citi have 21 days to supply the data and then I have 21 days to do something with the data. He also said in the event that any 3rd party analysis raised questions, that it was reasonable to expect Citi to respond direct to the third party regarding this, i.e. if I managed to find accountancy people willing to interpret the data if I am unable to do so myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, All the order said was that Citi have 21 days to supply the data and then I have 21 days to do something with the data. He also said in the event that any 3rd party analysis raised questions, that it was reasonable to expect Citi to respond direct to the third party regarding this, i.e. if I managed to find accountancy people willing to interpret the data if I am unable to do so myself.

 

Hi Deitus

Better still, no doubt citi will either fail to come up with the goods or try to fob the judge off with their usual £12 and £12.88 costings (without the evidence to back up their figure) looks like its all going your way... I like a happy ending..GC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So I went to court on 10th of July and the judge ordered Citi to provide a breakdown of their costs that justify their charges by July 31st. Surprise surprise they didn't. All they sent me were copy statements with dates highlighted to indicate charges. My question is, what do I do now? Do I wait for my hearing on 18th September or do I write to the court and request judgement by default given that they have failed to comply with the order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went to court on 10th of July and the judge ordered Citi to provide a breakdown of their costs that justify their charges by July 31st. Surprise surprise they didn't. All they sent me were copy statements with dates highlighted to indicate charges. My question is, what do I do now? Do I wait for my hearing on 18th September or do I write to the court and request judgement by default given that they have failed to comply with the order?

 

Hi you could write to the District Judge pointing out that citi have'nt complied with the order and ask for the defence to be struck out, but citi have a crafty way of filing papers into court late, they just done that with me, only after I sent them a nudge letter, im in court next wed and only recieved their docs on monday, of course they didnt comply with the full disclosure order in my case either..Best of luck..GC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately write to the court.

 

As for what you request, depends on the wording of the order, but would be tempted to ask for judgement by default.

 

Would also be wise to let the court know that in all instances where the defendant has been orderred to provide a breakdown of it's costs the defendant has defaulted on every occasion including an instance at the mercantile court.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enron you wouldn't have any details of a few of the exact cases they defaulted on would you? Not necessarily to put out publicly but to let me know in order to cite them in my letter? Obviously with the permission of those involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a list here, but think Gizmo's is likley to have more.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It has been a while since I updated guys, been a tad busy with college etc.

Citi failed to disclose (surprise surprise) so I filed for judgement by default. When we went back to court, the Citi representative was ill prepared and this seems to have gone majorly wrong for them. Also the fact that they didn't appeal the order to disclose but simply chose to defy it did not go down well with the Judge.

They then tried to have the case stayed pending the outcome of the test case, which I explained had no bearing on credit card cases. Apparantly it sounds like they have been successful with this tactic several times before.

Anyways the Judge declined to make give a decision there and then and advised me to go away and come up with some kind of offer to make to Citi which might win them over in light of the prospect of losing.

I decided against this and was duely rewarded when today official judgement came to me (I had had a draft ruling about a week prior) granting my claim in full :D.

I am a poor student, but rest assured, when I get my grubby mitts on the cash I will be making a donation to the site, and would like to thank everyone who helped but in particular Gizmo and Groovycaz. You are all ace people....keep fighting folks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent work buddy!

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...