Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

financial ombudsman


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

2 weeks ago i sent my bank stuff off to the financial ombudsman. I haven't had a peep out of them. I don't even know if it's been recieved. How long should it be before i hear anything at all? even a 'thanks we got your stuff' sort of thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I sent my info re PPI to the financial ombudsman recently, & I think it took about 2-3 weeks before they sent me a short letter confirming they'd got it & were looking into it & gave me a reference number to quote if I ever needed to call.

 

So hopefully it shouldn't be too long before you hear. If you don't hear by next week maybe give them a call & find out what's going on?

 

Good luck

 

Sharon x

xSharon x

Debtfreemummy (well I will be - one day!) :grin:

 

-LLOYDS TSB (2 accounts)

Sep 07 - awaiting current bank/OFT court case

 

-Lloyds TSB Visa - S.A.R - sent 1.5.07 - rec'd statements but not in full

-Mint Visa - S.A.R - sent 1.5.07 - not rec'd anything!

-Marbles Visa - S.A.R - sent 1.5.07 - statements rec'd 14.6.07 but not in full!

-Egg Visa - S.A.R - sent 1.5.07 - rec'd statements

 

 

-Lloyds TSB Loan PPI - after going through FOS received offer of full amount + interest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

loosepiece - bear in mind that the FOS recieve 1000 bank charge complaints per day (on top of all of the other complaints they get). Their internal mail can sometimes take a few days to arrive on the right desk. Are you starting to get the picture...?

After about 2 weeks you should get an acknowledgement for them stating that someone will write to you in more detail in a few weeks.

I understand from the FOS that most cases are currently taking 8-10 weeks to get settled at "mediation" (prior to any official ruling being made).

Hang in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

2 weeks ago i sent my bank stuff off to the financial ombudsman. I haven't had a peep out of them. I don't even know if it's been recieved. How long should it be before i hear anything at all? even a 'thanks we got your stuff' sort of thing?

Yes, the previous replies are correct, I have two cases with the ombudsman at the mo. They will reply in about 2-3 weeks to say they have received your info, you will be put into a "received pool", after another few weeks you will be transferred to the "allocation pool" and again after a few weeks you will be contacted by a case worker who will then deal with your case and hopefully make a decision.

 

Bear in mind, the decision by the case worker is not binding on the bank, you would have to continue your case with the FO to get an ombudsman's decision. All takes time, totalling approx 3-4 months, but the way the courts are filling up, it may take that long to get to court!

Gracias a la vida - Thanks to life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the previous replies are correct, I have two cases with the ombudsman at the mo. They will reply in about 2-3 weeks to say they have received your info, you will be put into a "received pool", after another few weeks you will be transferred to the "allocation pool" and again after a few weeks you will be contacted by a case worker who will then deal with your case and hopefully make a decision.

 

Bear in mind, the decision by the case worker is not binding on the bank, you would have to continue your case with the FO to get an ombudsman's decision. All takes time, totalling approx 3-4 months, but the way the courts are filling up, it may take that long to get to court!

 

I am currently going through the FOS route and the timings described are about right, but I see the process as slightly different.

 

According to the FOS, once a case has been allocated to the case team, it is sent, in bulk with others, to the bank in question wit a 'request for information'. At this point you will probably receive a letter from the FOS describing the information they have requested from the bank and saying it could take some time for the bank to reply.

 

As this request for information requires the bank to disclose actual costs etc for all transactions (which is what they never want to do) the banks usually cave at this point and make an offer, in 99% of cases for the full amount. If it is not the full amount then you can reject the offer and the ombudsman will take a decision. If all else fails you can then go to court, but I think that this is very unusual in these cases.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Muggy

LTSB £9,356 settled in full through the FOS

**

SIGN the petition to make banks deal with charges

**

**

COMPLAIN to your MP about the FSA waiver and the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT

Test Case is being handled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks for the information, haven't been via the FO before, and hopefully they will make the right decision.

 

Will let you all know the outcome, one way or the other, so others can make an informed decision about using them.

Gracias a la vida - Thanks to life

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...