Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Finally, finally, finally found it!  It's this para that talks about the legitimate interest and a two-hour parking limit. 57_extracted_WS Combined excl Ex2 .pdf
    • Thank you FTMDave. I've made the suggested changes and will see if there is any other feedback before posting a final copy.  I would be grateful if you could attached the Beavis judgment as I can't seem to find it. Do I also need to attach copies of the other judgments referenced in the WS?  And is there an easy way to find them? Many thank in advance!
    • Hi,  It has been very stressful. I have just received a letter of 'Notice of Transfer of Proceedings' which states the case has been transferred to my local court and to await judge's directions. Is there still a possibility that it will not go to court? The other issue I now have is that I am moving abroad for work in the next few months and now might not actually be able to attend the court hearing!  I am not sure what the best course of action is now. I feel like after all this, the MET are going to win anyway! HELP! 
    • Thanks for jumping in Bazza.  I understand that some people would suggest this.  But no. The moot point is that there should not be any debt.  There shouldn't be any reason for me to be made B.  The lender / receiver are responsible for the property not selling in a timely manner.  Whoever heard of a (well-located nice) property not selling in >5y?    They have no reasons.   Disclosure has subsequently offered staggering evidence which corroborates lender bad behaviour, bribery, and collusion/ interference with the receiver.  I am holding them to account for this.  It is clear they don't want this evidence in the public domain - it will shred their reputation.   (One also has to understand that the ceo - with collusion and conflict of interest (using same lawyers as lender) and receiver - tried to get the property cheap for his own use) They now want to agree a settlement.  I have separately reported a lawyer for negligence to the LO and SRA. I want to report the receiver as soon as I understand how to. I also would like to find some legal means of getting the property sold.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sev v MBNA


Sev
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

The fact that you are reading this is beacuse you are dealing with MBNA over unfair charges or perhaps other debt matters.

 

I have been through a very rough time in the past with MBNA, and still speak to people who are still going through a terrible time with them, and some, subjected to the most awful intimidation.

 

Recently I learnt that the local trading standards office for the Chester region meet with MBNA at least once a month.

 

The person I was in contact with filed a very comprehensive complaint with their local Trading standards, and sent a copy to the OFT headquarters.

 

Their complaint was reffered onto the Chester Trading standards who told this particular individual that with regards MBNA they had very few complaints!!!!

 

I urge all of you to please do the following:

1) With every request for charges refunded please complain to the OFT.

2) Please follow the leader link Do you think the Financial Ombudsman should do more? and register your dissatisfaction in their service.

 

3)If you are being subjected to a battery of phonecalls and intimidating letters from the MBNA because of circumstances which have led you to not be able to make your payments, dont be scared to complain. - PLEASE COMPLAIN.

 

Send complaints to the OFT, and at MBNA Michael Rhodes and Donna Pumfrey. Just don't write to the miscellaneous names on the auto generated letters that are sent in order to scare you into paying more than you can afford.

 

Three months ago, I was told that Michael Rhodes was going to chair a meeting at board level in order to put a atop to all of this going on. It is clearly obvious he has not done so judging from the number of people who I have spoken to about the treatment they have had at the hands of MBNA.

 

Although Michael himself will probably do next to nothing about it, it's the volume of complaint that is important, post or email, he must be made to see the damage his company's tactics are having on it's customers. And I don't believe for a moment he isn't aware of these methods.

 

4) COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN... you really must shout in order to get this lot to back down.

 

I'm in the process of trying to create a site detailing what happens when good debt goes bad, and unmask these institutions and their tactics. I don't know if I can change anything, but I can make people aware - and I'm going to start with MBNA- after all, i've got perfect first hand experience and documentated evidence.

 

Keep fighting, and if you have any personal accounts or want support or advice on what you have been told or sent i'll do my best try and help.

Feel free to PM anytime, and i'll reply as soon and as best as I can.

 

Sev

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

You got my vote Sev! MBNA are the worst of the lot! Very happy to take yur money and offer cards and loans but the moment you let them know you are having trouble you hit a brick wall. Hope the website idea goes ahead. Sounds like a great idea to me.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

I have just completed our Notice pusuant to s.10 of the Data Protection Act to MBNA, two actually one for my loan the the the infamous A & L/MBNA credit card

 

In the mail to day is a letter threating default..excuse me once the SAR has been sent and considering we have issued court procedings for Non compliance (although the paper work arrived after the deadline), they know that both accounts are in dispute and the Information Commissioner and the OFT are on their case.

 

This lot and Alliance & leicester really need exposure

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...