Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

;) Greetings and Welcome masontek:

I had plodded along since on my own since Jan07 up to the letter of refusal from the YB, when I was referred to the CAG site, well you can imagine what I felt like after reading continuos threads and info for 2 whole days regarding the YB and others, I have now today received a Court date for Aug 21 st @2pm , I am claiming an amount of £3,699 and of course the odd pennies [look after the pennies and the pounds will look after themselves , LOL LOL LOL ], I have also completed and submitted 2 more claims for my sons at the same time and have taken over all litigation in these matters with the full authorisation of the account holders, I only found out about it being illegal for the banks to levvy any monies from your benefits through the info on ere so did not include this on my N1 Form, but am saving this as an "ACE" up my sleeve, but after finding this out, have now contacted my new bank that I started with in March 2006 after an argument with the YB, where I was amazed to find that in 1yr they have also charged me £968 just for "Unauthorised overdrtafts " but which have ALL been levied from my benefits. So remember this "better in your pocket than left in theirs" claim what is rightfully yours, and feel free to contact me for any info, regarding although I can only point you in the direction as to where you will get the right info. will follow your thread.;) ;)

click my scales if I have helped ,

 

junkimunki xx

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hiya MT,

I just labelled it as I thought would explain it best, I divided my sheet into 8 columns first one date, [2] statement no:, [3] reason for charge[ U/O MONTHLY CHARGES ETC;] [4]how many,[5] amount per item,[6] daily, [7] monthly ,[8] total amount, this is just the spreadsheet I used to calculate just the charges taken from myself betweeen the relevant dates.

 

DATE St No Reason for xx Amount Daily Monthly Total

16/3/01 13 U/O +Monthly charge 3 £5.00 =£15 + £25 = £40.00

17/3/01 14 daily charges 5 x £5.00=£25 +---- = £65.00

this is just for a general idea hope it helps you , junkimunki;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for the intrusion Masontak, I offer you my apology for intruding upon your site but I was wondering if Conalot could let me know what years he has T+C's for as I am trying to locate the T+C's for 2001,- 2005, inclusive and would be eternally grateful to anyone if they could supply me with these.

Court date AUG 21ST 2PM;) :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will add you to my buddy list and follow ur progress MT, Pm if you need any more info, might be able to help if not I know someone will have the answer for you, I also have a thread in this forum "Junkimunki Vs Yorkshire Bank plc", COME AND FIND ME IF YOU LIKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!;):p junkimunki xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...