Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank has entered a defence, what now


Bigswede
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there everybody this is my first posting. I've been pursuing my claim, following the instructions on moneysavingexpert and my bank have today issued a defence against my claim. Can anybody give me some advice as to what kind of preparation I should make with regards to the court hearing or would I be better advised to arrange for a solicitor/paralegal to represent me if it comes to a day in court?

 

bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there BigMac it looks pretty standard having compared it to the ones I've seen on the other threads relating to Abbey but here is the meat of it :

 

The defendant will refer at trial to the full conditions but for the purposes of this defence will refer to the following extracts:

 

1) You can apply for an overdraft on your Account. If we give you an overdraft we will tell you your limit and the interest rate applicable.

2) An unauthorised overdraft occurs if without our agreement you overdraw your account or exceed your limit of an overdraft which we have agreed.

3) I you have an unauthorised overdraft, you will be charged fees as set out in our tariff of charges or specified to you and these may include fees for transactions we are unable to process due to lack of available funds in your account.

4) throughout the period that he ahs ahd the account, the claimant received a number of copies of the conditions and of the said tariff of charges as they were ammended and updated.

5) Any overdraft facility on the account was (and is) subject to the conditions.

6) The claimant has overdrawn or exceeded authorised overdraft limits on the account on a number of occassions, full details of which will be provided on disclosure. Therefore by virtue of the conditions referred to in paragraph 3 above such overdrawing was unauthorised and in breach of contract and the claimant became liable to pays fees to the defendant in accordance with its Tariff of Charges applicable at the relevant time. Inaccordance with the conditions, such fees were debited to the account.

&) In view of the facts and matters referred to in paras 3,4,5 and 6 above, the defendant denies that the amount of £xxxx or any other, amount was unlawfully debited to the account and the claimants claim for the repayment of that amount id therefore denied. The defendant denies that the claimant is entitled to claim interest in the sums of £XXX or at all.

9) further or in the alternative, even if the said fees are not proportionate to the defendants administrative expenses incurred (which id denied), the claimant remains liable to pay such fees as may be found to be proportionate and th eclaimant is not entitled to claim repayment of th full amount of each charge made to the account.

10) No admissions are made as to the amounts claimed by the cliamant and the claimant id put to strict proof of th same.

 

Thats about it.

 

regards

 

Bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Bigswede this is standard stuff and is actually saying you are entitled to claiming back charges but not in full, only over what is found to be proportionate and we both know that will never be discussed in a court so i would imagine a settlement to follow. Sent to intimidate and scare the claimant only.

When are you to appear in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Bigmac verses,

 

I only received the defence from Abbey two days ago, I haven't received any paperwork from MCOL yet which I assume will inform me of the court date. By the way thanks for your help so far.

 

Bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I have now received a date for the court hearing which is 11th September. The judge has placed the case on small claims fast track. I now plan to compile my court bundle and send copies to the court and the defendant (Abbey). Is there anything else I can do between now and the hearing to push Abbey into a settlement. As there is no Allocation Questionaire to complete because the case is fast track do I assume the judge will ask Abbey to provide proof of their unit cost regarding their loss incurred during the handling of my charges or is there something I can send Abbey and the court requesting they provide me with this evidence.

 

Regards

 

Bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm also at the exact stage as you. i recieved their defence on Thursday 28th with an offer of 65%. I havn't heard anything of the court yet but by going on your experience i should hear pretty soon.

good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an email asking for them to settle early, i done this on friday and 3 mails later i got an offer today i was happy with so it is definitely worth a go.

Abbey - Claiming £4,044.82:lol: offered £4,170 - accepted:) :) :) :)

 

Mint - Claiming £769.71:lol: offered £217 - declined

 

NatWest - Claiming £272

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi there

 

Does anybody know where I can access example of previous cases settled by Abbey (Names, dates and place etc.). I would like to place these in my court bundle. I would also like to know whether it is necessary for me to place Abbey T&C's in the bundle as well. Many thanks to everybody who has helped so far and good luck to you all.

 

Bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there all,

 

I am in the process of putting together my court bundle and since the start of my application (in April) Abbey have imposed a couple of further charges to my account, I would like to know the following:

 

1) I am inserting a 'Lastest Schedule of Charges' in my court bundle, is it acceptable to add the lastest charges even though they were not mentioned on the original schedule sent to Abbey.

 

2) Do I amend the interest calculations from the original schedule (completed in April) to the date of the court hearing. Therefore showing the court the full amount I am claiming upto and including the date of the trial.

 

Many thanks

 

Bigswede

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...