Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GWGW45 v RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all this is my first post. I must say I am blown away by the level of support on offer in here, the expertise and the camaraderie. I would like to say I have read everything around, but after 3hrs non stop I am verging on being brain dead:) If anyone can recommend any particular threads then I would appreciate it!

I have calculated all the penalty charges levied against my account in the last 6 years, written to RBS, received a "we are looking into it" letter, replied saying not good enough, you have 14 days, and have heard nothing more.

The 14 days are up and I was just about to issue a claim when I discovered this place. Whilst it is inspiring, I am also frightened about the prospect of the possible fun and games to come. The total charges are in the region of £600 and I have claimed a further c£80 interest (calculated at 8% court level)

Despite the way RBOS are conducting themselves as evidenced in here I am determined to proceed. However, before I do so, I wanted to ask the assembled if there is anything I should do when filing the N1 that will make my life easier later?

Thanks in anticipation

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you looked in the bank tempates library with regards to particulars of your claim? If not here's the link http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you looked in the bank tempates library with regards to particulars of your claim? If not here's the link http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

That is brilliant Rory, thank you fo the pointer. I shall use this to fill in my N1.

 

Regards

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the irony is I think RBS are actually one of the better/ more efficient ones and if you're serious it does seem like they give you some sort of offer fairly quickly........ plus they're less liable to start playing with "dirty tricks" (closing down accounts, charging dormany accounts, threatening to close accounts, sending out ambiguous threatening letters quoting stuff like the Berwick case (guy who lost against Lloyds in B'ham) as a precedent)......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

the irony is I think RBS are actually one of the better/ more efficient ones and if you're serious it does seem like they give you some sort of offer fairly quickly........ plus they're less liable to start playing with "dirty tricks" (closing down accounts, charging dormany accounts, threatening to close accounts, sending out ambiguous threatening letters quoting stuff like the Berwick case (guy who lost against Lloyds in B'ham) as a precedent)............... .......

They threatened me with taking away my current account and just allowing me a basic bank account with a cash card. Obviously, they didn't actually look at my account because if they had they would have realised they took away my current account facilities about 18 months ago and replaced it with a basic account.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the irony is I think RBS are actually one of the better/ more efficient ones and if you're serious it does seem like they give you some sort of offer fairly quickly........ plus they're less liable to start playing with "dirty tricks" (closing down accounts, charging dormany accounts, threatening to close accounts, sending out ambiguous threatening letters quoting stuff like the Berwick case (guy who lost against Lloyds in B'ham) as a precedent)......................

 

CHeers, I intend to file this evening, so time will tell. I will be sure to keep everyone on the loop.

 

For me the irony is that the reason I started off down this trail was that I went a few pounds over my OD limit for a matter of hours they stung me and they refused to refund it. So I said that if they would not refund I would go after all charges for the last 6 years, the rest is history.

 

What I really wish is that I knew all this 12 years ago. In those days I was struggling financially, trying get a business running and being shafted by the bank at every turn. In that time period I would guess that the charges for a 6 year period would have been several thousand:-( More recently I have been good as a result of earning more than I need to spend, but I have a wife who has yet to grasp the concept of checking the balance before spending. This is almost exclusively how I racked up the £600 charges.

 

Sorry for waffling!

 

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think everyone has their story.......

 

In my case my suspicions were seriously aroused about just how "dodgy" the entire charges issue was/is by being able to negotiate (albeit really hard to do) my charges to be refunded by my branch. I was only able to get a few refunded......... but that was when I realised that it's really obvious something is amiss ...... if they are "negotiable".........

 

I only started to get really angry when I was contracting, had a low and insecure income, and the bank knowing full well I was hard up started milking my account for every penny I had...and didn't have - the charges themselves simply put me deeper and deeper into overdraft. My gf has the same issue with Natwest - and she believes it's a huge amount thats come off.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Well nearly there, but want to be sure I get the interst claimed right, from reading round it seems as though that getting this right is critical as failing to do so gives the banks a potential get out of jail card

 

My understanding is that I can claim the court interest rate of 8% from the date the unlawful charge occurred to the date of the judgement. Now I know I can calculate the interest from the date the charge was made to today's date, but how do you manage from today to the date of the hearing, is it calculated at the time of the judgement and added to the overall claim?

 

If any of the above assumptions are incorrect please shout, alternatively if this is all detailed elsewhere, wpuld you kindly post a link?

 

Thanks

Gareth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GWGW45....

 

You're right about gettingt he numbers "right" for sure.....

 

I think the spreadsheets at the front page of this website detail the different sections you have to fill in and then they calculate itfor you but you claim for the following (for sure):

 

1. Charges

 

2. Overdraft Interest (automatically calculated on basis of interest levied on the basis of that charge coming off your account)

 

3. Interest at 8% (in accordance to s.69 County Courts Act)

 

4. It is very optional and quite risky for non-credit card companies (i.e. for all the banks) but you can "try" to get contractual, otherwise known as compounded, interest from them. I'm not sure how to do this, although I know there are spreadsheets for it - but I do know that in the case of RBS you're extremely unlikely to get it - at least from what i've read in all the case histories and threads........ If you're really keen on going for this "extra" interest then it might be well worth checking out the thread by Mcuth (Mcuth vs. RBoS) which has now been shifted accross to the "Won/ Successful" threads section. He tried to get it but was talked out of it by RBS's rather tough solicitors.....

 

Hope this helps.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd also get your claim into the "system" as soon as possible......

 

the logic being that the sooner it's received by RBS then the sooner they'll start dealing with it - as your first offer will usually come from the bank, and then you'll get a second "realistic" offer after a few months of being inside the small claims legal system - but much later on and closer to the trial date. Equally I've got a nasty feeling that there'll be more district judges who are going to follow the example of the judge in Hull in striking out masses of claims in the coming months - so at least if you get things moving now then you'll at least be in the nice situation of getting one offer........;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...