Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Many DCAs ...one step at a time!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning...

This mornings post brought confirmation from Moorcroft that they cannot supply signed credit agreement re.littlewoods extra.(returned po).

 

Also from Moorcroft re; Argos..They are going to contact client and request relevant info. and want me to 'give an indication of information you will be providing, when giving evidence to the court...' ..'please confirm whether for example you did not receive the credit/goods ordered...' Im sure I have read that I do not reply to this?

 

Now Reliable collections are acting on behalf of JD Williams.....They have sent me a 'true copy' of the agreement but it does not (according to them) have to have my date and signature on it ( blank copy of credit agreement sent). not sure what to do here..a while back I asked for charges and they refunded all the £12.00 charges back to my acount.. So as I have acknowledged this , the fact that they cannot supply a cca does it still mean I should carry on with the payment plan??

( All other 6 RD letters now confirmed 'lost' by Royal Mail.. and will now re-send by special delivery...if funds allow)...

 

regards

Jane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good Afternoon,

I have just received todays mail and am surprised (not) to find that one of my unsigned CCA request RD leters to GCC LTD (acting on behalf of Great universal cat.,) alleged debt has now been 'legally assigned' to Fredrickson Int. Ltd.!!

Do I send a CCA request straight to F I Ltd and at the same time send one to Great Universal..? I sent the original CCA request on 31st May to GCC Ltd.,and as mentioned it was unsigned for.

 

many thanks

jane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So today, Next have confirmed that they do not hold a signed credit agreement, but have entered a default entry on my credit reference file, is this usual?

Moorcroft have sent me an application form for Argos?!

 

moving on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to next and confirm that without the agreement which they have confirmed they don't have that 1) no agreement=no enforecable debt so the account should be reduced to zero and closed, 2) no agreement=no permission to share your data with third parties ie CRA or to process your information in any way. So they should remove any and all entries made with the CRA's and cease processing your data imediately. Think there is a template letter somewhere that covers this. You have them against the wall :) I assume as moorcroft only have an application not an agreement the same applies to them as well.

good luck

ali x

Btw I am no expert just give notes based on what I have read on here and other forums/sites, plus my own experiences and investigations.

 

All ccj's now dropped off file, 2 yrs to go to clear file.

All old debts either settled or made unenforcable.

 

RBS MPP-Full offer at 8 wks from first complaint

RBS Overdraft loanguard-full offer at 8 wks from complaint

Citicard ppi-with FOS finally paid 8 months after offer through FOS!

Capital one x2- with FOS

Monument ppi-with FOS

aqua x2 ppi-partialled settled still pushing for the rest

Black horse ppi-offers made and accepted except for one early loan they say no info held-still pushing for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies have no right to process your information if the debt is not enforceable. I'm the same as Ali and can't think which threads i've seen all the useful info.

 

I'll be back....:D

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just pinched some info Rory posted on Diddy's thread:

 

Re: Letter from Clarity on behalf of EGG CC

As I think was posted on another thread Diddy your agreement is very borderline in terms of whether it complies or not.

 

If you are going to claim back charges you will have to acknowledge the debt. However, as you are awaiting the results of the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) I think it is sufficient to simply say that the account is in dispute. I would refer you to the relevant OFT guidelines:

 

The Office of Fair Trading provided a Code of Guidance that is in relation to Debt Collection: OFT 664 Response to consultation paper and final guidance on unfair business practices dated July 2003

 

Deceptive and/or Unfair Methods-

2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:-

k. Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt.

 

I would also inform Egg that they should not be entering anything adverse on your credit file while the account is in dispute.

 

The Banking Code section 13.6:-

We may give information to the Credit Reference Agencies about personal debts you owe us if:

The Amount Owed is Not in Dispute.

 

Hope that helps ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...