Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Finally, finally, finally found it!  It's this para that talks about the legitimate interest and a two-hour parking limit. 57_extracted_WS Combined excl Ex2 .pdf
    • Thank you FTMDave. I've made the suggested changes and will see if there is any other feedback before posting a final copy.  I would be grateful if you could attached the Beavis judgment as I can't seem to find it. Do I also need to attach copies of the other judgments referenced in the WS?  And is there an easy way to find them? Many thank in advance!
    • Hi,  It has been very stressful. I have just received a letter of 'Notice of Transfer of Proceedings' which states the case has been transferred to my local court and to await judge's directions. Is there still a possibility that it will not go to court? The other issue I now have is that I am moving abroad for work in the next few months and now might not actually be able to attend the court hearing!  I am not sure what the best course of action is now. I feel like after all this, the MET are going to win anyway! HELP! 
    • Thanks for jumping in Bazza.  I understand that some people would suggest this.  But no. The moot point is that there should not be any debt.  There shouldn't be any reason for me to be made B.  The lender / receiver are responsible for the property not selling in a timely manner.  Whoever heard of a (well-located nice) property not selling in >5y?    They have no reasons.   Disclosure has subsequently offered staggering evidence which corroborates lender bad behaviour, bribery, and collusion/ interference with the receiver.  I am holding them to account for this.  It is clear they don't want this evidence in the public domain - it will shred their reputation.   (One also has to understand that the ceo - with collusion and conflict of interest (using same lawyers as lender) and receiver - tried to get the property cheap for his own use) They now want to agree a settlement.  I have separately reported a lawyer for negligence to the LO and SRA. I want to report the receiver as soon as I understand how to. I also would like to find some legal means of getting the property sold.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Got a Court Date! ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

;-) Hi, started claiming bank charges (Yorkshire Bank) in January, have gone through all the motions and am finally up to waiting for a court date, which i received yesterday ... Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track (Hearing) with a court date set for 21 June 2007 :o ! What do i need to do now? Any help and guidance would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You're very welcome ;) Just shout if you need any more help and I'm sure someone will be around to offer good advice.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i'm just sorting thro stuff for my court bundle .... documents recommended to send that I found on this site include:-

 

  • all cases and statute upon which your claim relies

Sorry for being thick but what exactly does that mean? :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My court date has been set for the 21 June. Today I received a letter from YB which goes as follows...............

 

In our Defence we make the following points;

 

  • To the extent that any bank charges were applied to the account, they were applied in accordance with the terms and conditions of the account which you accepted when the account was opened. Any charges applied as a result of your failure to adhere to the limits placed on the account were for the service provided by the bank in extending those facilities.

  • Your assertion that any such charges are a penalty or unfair in terms of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and therefore unenforceable is misconceived. For either to apply, there must have been a breach of contract which is not the case here.

  • We will refer the Court to the decision of the Birmingham County Court in Berwick v Lloys TSB Bank plc on 15 May 2007 which has received widespread publicity. This decision confirmed that our position on both issues discussed above is correct. We have enclosed a copy of the decision for your information.

  • In addition to the issues discussed above any charges applied to your account prior to 6 March 2001 will now be time barred pursuant to the Limitation Act 1980 (the time limit for such claims being 6 years).

For all the above reasons, the Bank is confident that your claim will not succeed. You are advised to seek independent legal advice before continuing further with your claim. In particular, you should seek legal advice as to the cost consequences of continuing with your claim.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Is it me or is that intimidating ...... is this just more bullyboy scare tactics to put me off????????? and do i put this letter into my court bundle?? Has anyone else had one of these ?????? Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, problem is its really un-nerved me now, have been getting info together all week for my court bundle and would feel more confident if I had YB Terms and Conditions, i have wrote to them a few times requesting them but they have never sent them out. I'm also worried that when i go to court that i will blow the whole thing ..... will hopefully feel more positive tomorrow :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Georgieboy, will go for a look and try and sort out which statement of evidence i need, its all so time consuming and mind blowing sometimes.

 

Much appreciated your help! Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, on the Statement of Evidence I am using one paragraph states;

3. The Claimant cites the case of Robinson v Harman [1848] 1 Exch 850, which states that a contractual party cannot profit from a breach of contract and that the charge for a loss suffered from the breach should be the amount necessary to put both parties in the same position before the breach occurred.

Do i need to include this in my bundle and does anyone know where i can find this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi stevie i have had exactly the same defence letter and agree it is meant to intimidate it unnerved me as well

 

i have been searching everywhere for terms and conditions could i pm you my email and send them to me thanks voyager9

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks stevie

nationwide settled in full 7/06/2007

 

yorkshire bank settled in full 15/06/2007

 

capital one filed at court 06/06/2007 acknowledged 15/6 defence received 30/6 AQ sent 2/7 with application for summary judgement--hearing date 18 sept foe defence to be struck out

 

cahoot filed at court 25/06/2007 to acknowledge default judgement granted 27/06###won###settled in full

 

HBOS filed at court acknowledged 20/06/2007 default judgement granted 16th july so won

Link to post
Share on other sites

c) The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year, from [date when the money became owed to you] to [the date you are issuing the claim] of £ [amount] and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of [enter the daily rate of interest]

HELLO ANYONE HELP ME FILL THE ABOVE IN REGARDING THE N1 CLAIMS FORM IT WOULD BE MUCH APPRECIATED

MY DETAILS ARE AS FOLLOWS

MY FIRST CHARGE WAS ON 31/7/2003 (1399 DAYS AGO)

MY FINAL CHARGE WAS ON 23/01/07 (127 DAYS AGO)

TOTAL INTEREST FROM MY SPREADSHEET TOTALS £202.49

HOW D I CALCULATE THS ON A DAILY BASIS

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i have a hearing date for a Case Management Conference on 28th June at Leeds CC which along with about 150 others claiming against YB is allocated to 1/2 day. anyone else familiar with this? i have to send some forms off 7 days before to Court and to YB any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lousecutiepie take a look at this thread... Leeds Mercantile Court Hearing 28th June 2007 I'm sure there will be plenty of people that will be able to give you advice on that thread.

 

Sarah.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, could really do with some help with the Statement of Evidence, one of the paragraphs states;

 

3. The Claimant cites the case of Robinson v Harman [1848] 1 Exch 850, which states that a contractual party cannot profit from a breach of contract and that the charge for a loss suffered from the breach should be the amount necessary to put both parties in the same position before the breach occurred.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If you cite something does this mean that you have to include it?? or can it just be as referred to in the above paragraph?? If not does anyone have a copy of this or can point me in the direction of where i mite find it, have to submit bundle by this Thursday 7 June :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...