Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Jordan v HSBC - **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

anyone ?!

 

i'm probably going to have to make a decision tonight about this, so any opinions are really welcome ! i'm really not sure whether to persue this or not ..

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a tough one is this, i have filed my mcol about 8 days ago, so i really have my fingers crossed that if the cases are all to be stayed, then i just miss that, how much difference is there between the 90% and the 100%? in your claim?

HSBC- £4995, settled payment in full

if you found this post helpful, please click the scales (top right of post), ta ;)

 

if you're not sure what to do?, Read the FAQ's

Unsure about what to claim, or confused about overdraft interest? Charges explanation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Maverik - My total claim was for £1444 and they offered £1300, the deadline for my LBA is on the 4th July and I've already (before I saw that thread) sent a thanks, but no thanks response to the bank (although I'm thinking I'd be alright to retract that and accept the payment as settlement)

 

I'd really like the full amount to be honest, but I'm wondering whether it's worth it if its going to be prosponed pending the judgement of that test case .. :S

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well this is the problem. however i must stress that this is only one person, and their circumstances are unusual in that they havent had any communication with their financial institution, and have tried to have a default judgement put in place, therefore the court has had to do some investigating, not only that, but they didnt use BAG standard practice , they heve used the information from another forum , which may have led to this problem, i am only summising, but i am hopefull that as most of our cases never even get to the court allocation stage, we should be allright

HSBC- £4995, settled payment in full

if you found this post helpful, please click the scales (top right of post), ta ;)

 

if you're not sure what to do?, Read the FAQ's

Unsure about what to claim, or confused about overdraft interest? Charges explanation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll wait until the 5th and see .. HSBC may have gotten in touch by then (hmm!)

 

I wasnt aware of those details actually, I can see why the judge would prospone that particular case but it'd be good to know whether all new cases are getting the same treatment. I'll find out soon enough I suppose !

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have decided to send the following to HSBC via email to see if it get's me any further:

 

*FAO: *

 

Mr. Colin Langdale

Senior Service Quality Officer

Arlington Business Centre,

Milshaw Park Lane,

Leeds

LS11 OPP

 

*

*

 

*ACCOUNT NUMBER: *********

 

*SORT CODE: *******

 

Ref: ***********

*

 

 

Dear Mr. Langdale,

 

I am writing to you with regard to the letter I received from you on the 28th of June 2006. In this correspondence an offer of £1300 of my claim for £1444.75 for charges levied against me from the dates 23^rd February 2001 to 2^nd May 2006 was made.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I would respectfully ask that the full amount be refunded to my account, I have every intention of taking this case to court, where I am confident these charges cannot be justified. Surely, it would be better to settle now, rather than waiting until the case proceeds to court, increasing the cost to HSBC and its shareholders.

 

I ask you to use common sense in your decision.

 

As a gesture of goodwill, I will extend my timetable by two working days, If you do not comply, within this timetable, I will begin court proceedings without any further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have decided to send the following to HSBC via email to see if it get's me any further:

 

*FAO: *

 

Mr. Colin Langdale

Senior Service Quality Officer

Arlington Business Centre,

Milshaw Park Lane,

Leeds

LS11 OPP

 

*

*

 

*ACCOUNT NUMBER: *********

 

*SORT CODE: *******

 

Ref: ***********

*

 

 

Dear Mr. Langdale,

 

I am writing to you with regard to the letter I received from you on the 28th of June 2006. In this correspondence an offer of £1300 of my claim for £1444.75 for charges levied against me from the dates 23^rd February 2001 to 2^nd May 2006 was made.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I would respectfully ask that the full amount be refunded to my account, I have every intention of taking this case to court, where I am confident these charges cannot be justified. Surely, it would be better to settle now, rather than waiting until the case proceeds to court, increasing the cost to HSBC and its shareholders.

 

I ask you to use common sense in your decision. leave this out as its antagonising

 

As a gesture of goodwill, I will extend my timetable by two not very long is it?, how about 5 days? working days, If you do not comply, within this timetable, I will begin court proceedings without any further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

you should probably say aswell that you are willing to accept their offer as part payment only and that you will pursue the bank for the remainder in court if necessary

HSBC- £4995, settled payment in full

if you found this post helpful, please click the scales (top right of post), ta ;)

 

if you're not sure what to do?, Read the FAQ's

Unsure about what to claim, or confused about overdraft interest? Charges explanation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll wait until the 5th and see .. HSBC may have gotten in touch by then (hmm!)

 

I wasnt aware of those details actually, I can see why the judge would prospone that particular case but it'd be good to know whether all new cases are getting the same treatment. I'll find out soon enough I suppose !

 

At this stage there is absolutely no reason to suppose that cases will be stayed generally. We have heard of no further cases since last Friday and, given the volumes going through the process at the moment. it's looking less likely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage there is absolutely no reason to suppose that cases will be stayed generally. We have heard of no further cases since last Friday and, given the volumes going through the process at the moment. it's looking less likely.

 

Thanks for that Seminole, it was a thought thats all ... It'd have been typical :eek:

 

Maverik - Thanks for the reply also, I'd already sent the email off to their customer care address before you'd had a look, to be honest I'm expecting a flat refusal from HSBC anyhow, so the wording of the email probably doesn't matter much!

 

I had the standard ' Thank you for contacting us .... We are looking into it ' response from them this morning .... Fingers crossed that they'll make an offer before the MCOL stage, which I've decided to file on the 5/6th.

 

Anyhow ! Thanks for the replies, on we go ! ;)

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D There was another letter waiting for me when I got home from work today .. Pretty much the same as the previous letter from HSBC, only offering the FULL amount,with no conditions. :p

 

:D fantastic:D ... and I didn't even have to file on MCOL !!

 

Thank you for all the help, this is a really great website .. Keep up the good work ! I'll hang around and offer what encouragement I can, naturally I'll be making a donation as soon as the funds arrive in my account.

 

Cheers everyone ! :razz:

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great news!

 

Congratulations!!

 

Please complete our bank charges survey.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D There was another letter waiting for me when I got home from work today .. Pretty much the same as the previous letter from HSBC, only offering the FULL amount,with no conditions. :p

 

:D fantastic:D ... and I didn't even have to file on MCOL !!

 

Thank you for all the help, this is a really great website .. Keep up the good work ! I'll hang around and offer what encouragement I can, naturally I'll be making a donation as soon as the funds arrive in my account.

 

Cheers everyone ! :razz:

 

Great news!

 

I had the same letter last Thursday (just before I was due to file) and immediately faxed it back and then also sent it recorded delivery, however so far there's no sign of any money.

 

Thinking of ringing them up now actually to ask where it is!

 

So don't get too excited until it's actually in your account!

 

James

Round 1: HSBC Current account - £1050 of unlawful charges refunded before even filing my claim! (August 2006)

Round 2: HSBC Current account (again!) - £275 refunded after preliminary letter! (June 2007)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm ! In my covering letter I stipulated the case would be dropped only if the money reached my account in 7 working days (their timetable on the letter)

 

HSBC - Free HD-TV with every account ;)

04/07/2006 - Full, unconditional offer made from HSBC, accepted. £1444.xx (unfair charges)

01/06/2011 - Barclay CC PPI claim initiated

13/09/2011 - Claim rejected :|

19/10/2015 - Claim restarted !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

HSBC - Free HD-TV with every account ;)

 

rofl, how did you know?, im gonna get one now i've won my case

HSBC- £4995, settled payment in full

if you found this post helpful, please click the scales (top right of post), ta ;)

 

if you're not sure what to do?, Read the FAQ's

Unsure about what to claim, or confused about overdraft interest? Charges explanation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

dont forget to ask for the discount for paying cash 8)

id be looking at IPTV too something better than the slingshot, but IPTV HD doesnt seem to be around in the UK yet.

 

i wonder if that

"I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law. "

 

was the part that made them offer, after all, i'd not assume that even the people opening the letters are aware or understand all of the law and so, on off the top of their heads, perhaps the fact you mentioned the contract and are useing it to your advantage instead of theirs, took them by suprise perhaps, whatever the case , it would be interesting to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...