Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Alphageek Vs Capital One ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5539 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, I left it out. It's not a large amount anyway.

 

N1: printed, signed and in the mail this morning.

 

They nearly got let off the hook - my printer's ink ran out! Doh! :)

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a nice letter from them today tell me of how concerned they are about my account.

 

Oh well, I guess that's the last one of those I will be getting. I will miss them :Cry:

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a nice letter from them today tell me of how concerned they are about my account.

 

Oh well, I guess that's the last one of those I will be getting. I will miss them :Cry:

All good things come to an end :rolleyes:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received my Notice of Issue (specified amount) papers this morning.

 

Your claim was issued on 07 December 2007. The court sent it to the defendant by first class post on 10 December 2007 and it will be deemed to be served on 12 December 2007. The defendant has until 27 December 2007 to reply.
Also under separate cover;

 

The Defendant filed an Acknowledgement of Service on 18 December 2007.

 

The defendant responded to the claim indicating an intention to defend all of the claim.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case you should hear from Capital One soon, with a Goodwill Offer, probably all of the charges, your Purchase Interest, 8% and court fee. The winning post is in sight:D

They always say they'll defend but they never actually do. Although I have recently had a copy of what can only loosely be called a defence - received after they'd sent a cheque in settlement.

Also received their completed AQ yesterday-I've already discontinued the claim, so just shows how disorganised they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alphageek

 

This is how it happens. They say they will defend then pay up. Check your account online everyday from now on, if you have internet access that is. The letter will arrive a few days after your refund.

 

uK

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to log on to their website shows me this;

Unfortunately, due to the status of your account, you are unable to access the account by this method.

Please call us on 0800 9524961 between 8.00am and 9.00pm to discuss the account. The call is free.

Bad losers! :D

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received this from them today;

 

7 January 2008

 

Dear Alphageek

Account No. xxx

 

Court Claim xxx

 

I write in connection to the above court claim, which you have issued against Capital One Bank (Europe) plc in relation to the fees and interest and payment protection insurance (PPI) we have charged to your account. I have now had the opportunity to investigate your claim of £9xx.xx.

 

It is denied that the fees are unlawful as they are detailed in your terms and conditions and in our welcome pack. Our fees are based on the costs we incur when a customer breaks their contract by missing a payment, paying late or going over their credit limit. The fees are only levied when a customer breaches their contract in this way and can be avoided if payments are maintained and the balance kept within the credit limit.

 

Furthermore, the PPI was added when you called us to activate your card on 6 May 2005. Capital One is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the sale of insurance. We are required to ensure that our telephone scripting is clear, fair and not misleading. In accordance with FSA requirements for a telephone sale of insurance you were asked for your consent to hear the limited version of terms and conditions whilst on the call, and to receive full details in the post immediately afterwards. The product is optional and this was made clear to you.

 

Questions are asked to determine eligibility for the PPI product during the telephone call. You received the full policy document, which included full terms and conditions and policy summary immediately after the conclusion of contract in accordance with FSA requirements for a telephone sale of insurance. This contains a full list of exclusions. You also received a certificate of insurance which sets out cost and start date of the policy.

 

Capital One is not authorised to provide advice in relation to insurance products. Capital One would not therefore have made a recommendation that you should take out PPI, or advised you that the product was suitable.

You received a 30 day cooling off period in which you could cancel the policy free of charge.

 

Capital One has procedures in place to monitor the sale of PPI over the telephone. Our associates use scripts and are trained to avoid giving advice to customers. We undertake quality checks to ensure sales are being made in a compliant manner.

 

Capital One has acted in accordance with the terms and conditions of your credit agreement throughout this matter and it is clear you have no claim against Capital One.

 

Whilst we do not accept liability for your claim, I have in an effort to resolve this matter without the need for a court hearing, refunded £7xx.xx to your account.

 

After reviewing the amount you are claiming for interest, Capital One has found that it is incorrect. Therefore, we have refunded all the fees that have been added to your account totalling £3xx, the PPI premiums of £1xx.xx, interest of £2xx.xx, 8% statutory court interest of £4x.xx and your £65 court fee.

 

This has cleared the balance on your account and put it in credit by £1xx.xx. I have arranged to send you a cheque for this amount, which you will receive within 14 working days.

 

These refunds are made purely as a gesture of goodwill and we will now defend this claim on the basis that we have refunded your full claimed amount.

 

Once your claim is settled, I must advise you that if you use your account again we may still add fees to your account if you do not keep it up to date. We have now reduced our fees to £12. We believe that these fees are fair and you will be automatically charged a £12 fee for any of the following: -

•Missing a payment

 

•Making a late payment

 

•Allowing your balance to go over your credit limit

 

•Your direct debit or cheque payment being returned unpaid.

This is in accordance with the terms and conditions of your account which you agreed to abide by when you signed your credit agreement with us. If you no longer agree to adhere to these terms, I would respectfully request you consider closing your account when you have repaid your balance.

 

I hope I have explained things clearly for you and we can move on from here. I would finally request that you contact the court to confirm the settlement and discontinue your claim. This is very important as it is your responsibility to inform the court that your claim is settled and avoid wasting any further valuable court time.

 

We have also written to the court to confirm that we have paid in full.

 

(Please note, calls to the 0845 number at the top of this letter will be charged at a local rate. The cost will vary depending on your service provider. Calls may be recorded/monitored for training purposes.)

 

Yours sincerely

 

Ellie Renshaw

Executive Office Manager

They are totally bonkers in my opinion.

 

It is denied that the fees are unlawful as they are detailed in your terms and conditions and in our welcome pack.
Well, why didn't you just say when I initially complained?

 

Our fees are based on the costs we incur when a customer breaks their contract by missing a payment, paying late or going over their credit limit.
I think the phrase is "strict proof" isn't it?

 

After reviewing the amount you are claiming for interest, Capital One has found that it is incorrect.

Oh, ok then!

 

We have now reduced our fees to £12. We believe that these fees are fair and you will be automatically charged a £12 fee for any of the following: -

•Missing a payment

 

•Making a late payment

 

•Allowing your balance to go over your credit limit

 

•Your direct debit or cheque payment being returned unpaid.

 

Isn't that why we're here in the first place?

 

Also, no mention of adverse CRA data removal.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received their defence indicating that they dispute the full amount;

 

Capital has refunded all the fees and payment protection insurance (PPI) premiums on a non liability basis.

 

The fees were added in accordance to the credit agreement the claimant signed when he opened his account with Capital One 27 April 2005.

 

Furthermore the PPI was added at the customers request when he called to activate his credit card in May 2005. The PPI was sold using regulated scripts and the customer received the relevant documentation about the PPI and had a 30 day cancellation period.

 

The interest the claimant is requesting is too high, therefore we agreed to refund all the purchase interest on the claimant's account and 8% Statutory interest.

And an AQ that I have to return by the 28th Jan.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the advice would be to wait till you actually receive their cheque, then discontinue the claim. However, if there's a default, you need to keep the claim whole, otherwise you'll find it harder to get the default removed I think. MKAndy and Rory 32 would be good to advise you on this, my own claim was not about default so i'm not too clear on it to be honest. But congrats on what you've done so far, anyway:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Wendy and Steven.

 

There is no default, but there are [1], [2] and [3] markers against my credit file.

 

A few [1]s from 2005 onwards and then the [1][2][3] escalator from when I stopped making payments to them earlier this year.

 

What now?

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what you want to do. If you want the markers removed you will have to write and tell them that you will not accept their offer unless it includes removal of the markers (I presume this is something you have requested all along - I have not checked back through the thread I'm afraid) and that you intend to carry on with the court case. Send them the cheque back.

 

It's a bit of a gamble but no case of this sort has gone to court yet so while you still have that lever you should be able to get them to comply.

 

HAve you followed this thread?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I had mentioned the incorrect CRA data from the outset. So I will persist.

 

I had not followed MKandy's thread. Will go and have a read of it now.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...