Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

allen V's A&L


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5817 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi need a little help as im new to this. Ive sent out all the normal letters even called the bank to give them one last chance but was basically told to do one!! now starting to do my mcol but struggling.

Do i need to some how attch a list of the charges with my mcol?

Does it matter if the mcol is just in my name but the account is in joint?

would be grateful for the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sorry to be a pest to everyone but since finding this site a week ago ive realised what a fight the banks are putting up !! i suppose i thought it would just be a walk in the park anyway does it matter if the mcol is for a lower amount than originally asked for? The letters i sent to the bank were for £5530.00 not including interest which when added made it more than £6000.00 but as im a student nurse i can not afford to pay the 250.00 costs of a mcol but if i only claim 5000.00 the cost is120.00 which i am hoping to be able to pay by the end of the month. glad to hear so many people have won their cases and good luck to all those who are still trying!!!

would be so grateful for all and any advice :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Just read the post above, have you thought of breaking it up i.e... claim 2007- 2004 now then the rest at a later date? then you're not losing out?

Only problem is to cover yourself if you are claiming for a different amount i would suggest doing the lba again.

Its totally your decision but it gives you another few weeks and it covers you?

send the lba for half the amount now, give them 2 weeks before MCOL, then file for 1 half of your total. Then money permitting file the other at a later date.

Just keep the dates clear in the lba.

Hope that helps

Jen

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

When youve done your mcol, post a copy of your schedule to mcol and your bank, with mcol send a cover letter asking it to be filed with your claim, remember to put your mcol ref number which you will get when the claim is done.

Jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read here just in case you are exempt. Its always worth checking...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/helpful-external-links/63-county-court-fees-exemptions.html

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jen yes i did follow all the steps in fact i repeated the last one and rang them up after not hearing from them on the final letter. sorry abit thick when it comes to abreveations :| thanks again

nicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any one know if it makes a difference if the account is in joint name and if u can make a mcol in joint name or does it have to be one? also if i ever do finally win this back and the cheque comes in joint name can i put it into a bank account in just my name as at the min he does not have one and he just uses mine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, You're not being thick...do'nt worry.

My claim is in joint names but all letters etc have been in my name only. mcol in my name and when you get your cheque as long as your name is on it it should be okay...if in doubt add his name on your acc if thats possible?

jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice ive filled out my mcol just got to wait 2 weeks till i can afford to pay and then send it off. On the list of charges that u have to send to u need to put what there for or just the date and amount as my list just has this at the min but i can change it, and do u think they will settle out of court or do they like dragging people all the way?

Again thanks for all the help!!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I've just put the date and amount but others have put which it was i'e failed dd, bounced chq etc. I am sure they will settle my claim is abit tricky as its more than 6yrs but if you keep reading the threads, A&L are settling all the time.

Jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well good luck with yours let me know how u get on!! i must admit i thought they may of settled before now i even sent them a letter offering to taken a lower amount but they still said no! thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, heres my link...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/56153-hi-all.html

 

I refused a settlement of half the amount just after i filed mcol, but i was really nervous. It was nice having the cheque for a short while....

Good luck..I've subscribed to your thread so i'll keep up to date with you...

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, this happened ysterday morning..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/90246-first-victory-lloyds.html

 

Here is the link to the thread as it was one of our guys.

But dont worry too much about it and carry on with your claim as normal.

 

Also this is just 1 which isnt clear cut, against the thousands of wins.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi has anyone else had a REALLY silly offer from alliance and leicester accompanied by a letter on how the courts are now looking at this in a different light? i did this morning my claim is for £5535.00 and they want to offer me £52.31 as this amount is apparantly the difference between a £12 charge and what they ve charges me!!!!! what a joke!!! Dont think im even going to lower myself to reply to that one but would be interesting to know if this is normal

 

Nicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I've not had this but the way they act doesnt surprise me, for every 1 person who gets this far.....dozens give up. Keep confidence in yourself and your claim.

Jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Jen, Dont know if im excited or nervous!! but these little things keep playing with my nerves. The letter they sent was very well worded on how their solicitors have been told that judges will start looking at this the same as credit cards and therefore will not have to give a full refund. It 's enough to put any one off !!!

 

Nicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicky, My letter was similar i.e bank charges were lawful and therefore un-claimable...the oft was talking about ccards so my claim was not realevant*(spelling???).

But i did have a nice chat with a&l today. Going to court was not even mentioned so hopefully we'll get a offer soon, but £52 is taking the p***!! They are acting like its not serious enough to them which could be a good thing???

Jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I wouldnt mind but they havent even done their maths right, £52 is not the difference between what they charged me and this magical £12 anyway!!! Well should be filing my mcol tues so here i come!!!!:evil: :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEED A LITTLE HELP!!!!!

Ive filed my mcol and have looked on the site today and its asking me to choose from two options

1) Judgement by default

or

2) judgement by admission

 

What does this mean and which one do i choose???

This is getting scarey now :o :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicky, These are what to choose when A&L's time is up...If you click on either, it wont let you do anything till their 14 or 28 days are up.

Hope that helps

 

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...