Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

complete nightmare - advice needed!


maud26
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I have found this site through Google and hope someone may advise me.

Myself and my partner have had debt problems for as long as we can remember, bankruptcy several years ago (now discharged for 6 years). 2 years ago she ordered a catalogue and because she didn't think she would be eligible she applied online using her mom's name. The request was accepted and she ordered goods and has always maintained payments on the account. On Monday she telephoned them to give a new address and they asked for proof of ID to be sent in, which she obviously cannot provide. Does anyone have any idea what may happen now? I know you may all shout and say its wrong but it was the only way we get clothes for our daughter, she is really worried about it and hasn't slept since.

Thank you

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems she may be able to now we are a bit better off, she was terrified to tell me! She thinks the fraud squad are going to turn up any minute and i've never heard of this before so dont know what to say, the only positive thing is that payments have always been made on time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any way that your partner could come clean to her Mum ?.... maybe then, you could think of a way around the problem together. Her Mum might be willing to say that she lived with you for a while... and be willing to keep the catalogue running at her own address, collecting payments from your partner herself.

 

I suppose it depends on what kind of relationship she has with her mother.... is she aware of your circumstances and how hard it's been over the years ?

 

The catalogue can't have done many checks or presumably, they would have realised that her name couldn't be found at your address on any Credit Reference Agencies anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Her mother is fully aware how difficult its been for us but is not understanding in the least. Its strange because the payments have often been made by my wife's debit card or a cheque so obviously a payment has never been made in the account holders name.

thanks

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

maud,

 

do not worry for a second.

 

about a year ago i sold my house and the new owner rented it out. the new tenants ordered thousands on catalogues, all in my mums name.

 

they never paid a penny back and although this is clearly a case of id fraud and i have the names and new addresses of the people who did it - the police where completely disinterested! not interested in the slightest to the point they refused to investigate - until I made a complaint to the inspector - who also tried his hardest not to help until I told him I would take it to the chief inspector AND name him as being the unhelpful one. Reluctantly, he agreed to take details of the crime.

 

As for the catalogue companies, they too were not interested in pressing charges, they just want their money and thats it.

 

From this experience I would say it is very difficult to get into trouble - impossible if you have actually paid the bills!

 

good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Thanks so much for all the advice. Just tried to clear the balance but it wont even let us log in so looks like they have put something into action. Wife up the wall with worry again! Looks like i'm in for a good weekend!

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...