Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Powergen - sudden huge bill


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6060 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If a bill isn’t due to be sent within 2 weeks (last time I heard), by law they have to refund you the credit on the account and cant refuse and to be honest wouldn’t refuse unless the account is billed to an estimate in which case all you have to do is update the readings and once its through the system (24 hours) the account will be up to date and a refund can then be issued.

The way they calculate the direct debit is they use the previous year’s readings to calculate the usage for this year at the present rate and then break it down into 12 equal payments. The only reasons why people complain about the direct debit being put up is either due to a large price increase or the customers usage going up and then they complain that it's powergens fault for them getting into debit when they get a monthly bill showing the debit on the account and the customer lets it build up and up until the account gets reviewed by Powergen (every 6 months but used to be a year) who then put the DD up to cover the usage and debt. As long as prices stay reasonably the same and the usage doesn’t change too much, you shouldn’t really have a problem and end the year with a small credit or small debit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'll double check into that then, thanks. Still not going to set up a DD debit for now - this time last year there was no-one living in the house anyway [was empty before we bought it] so will wait a while.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Weirdly this quarter's bill has just come in....at £86 [from meter readings]. Really failing to understand how one quarter can be £206 and the next only £86!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

this is still ongoing - have been paying each bill but the £206 is still outstanding as all bills since have been smaller and they still can't explain why it's so high. we have paid each quarters bills to keep the account up to date but as I said this amount is still outstanding. We have written to them but in need of urgent advice please....

 

someone came to visit 3rd sept ish - called Powergen who said no-one shoud be here.

 

wrote to them 10th sept [same person / address as previous correspondence], on 13th sept a "PDV visit" which we've been charged £30 for. They sent us a table with breakdown of account but didn't make sense.

 

Anyway last week received a letter from a Powergen in Bedford address [previousy was Powergen in Nottingham] saying they were issuing a court warrant for access to the property and court appt was / is 29th Oct.

 

Replied to Bedford address explaining the account was in dispute and had not had a reply from their Nottingham person. Also sent copy of documents to the court and Bedford address - but to date heard nothing from either.

 

received a letter from Nottingham today, but this time the Director's office, saying we were notified of PDV visit by letter [never were] hence the charge. Tried to call the number given earlier and no answer.

 

Court is on Monday and would rather sort this before - do we pay the outstanding amount less £30 charge or keep fighting and run the risk of a warrant?

 

Really need to call them soon and need help please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose you have 2 options and neither are very nice to be honest. 1, you can pay off the balance and keep pestering them once you have the collections people off your back or 2, you can continue on this track. Court is just to get a warrent to get access to your property to change your meter from a credit meter to a prepayment meter. Although they call it a pre disconnection visit, You WONT be cut off. The only problem with that is they will add the money they think you owe to the meter so when you top it up it takes say £5 for the debt and what ever is left goes towards your usage. The only bonus is you wouldnt have to worry about debt any more. If there was a problem with your meter. didnt they backdate your bill to the day/reading when you first moved in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...