Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well I wouldn't have known if my Booking.com listing owning friend hadn't come up trumps - so really the thanks should go to him. Anyway, glad it all worked out OK and you don't have to kip in the local bus station waiting room 😉
    • TV debate coach who helped Rishi Sunak given £110,000 taxpayer-funded contract - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Graham Davies, who calls himself 'the Presentation Coach', has been drafted in to help ministers improve their public speaking. He previously coached...  
    • Hi Dave. This morning I had another message from the owner, saying she's rung Booking.com again to ask them to sort the cancellation. And I just took a call from what looks like Booking.com's UK number. They offered us alternative accommodation but I had already found something on the Booking.com site two days ago. So we aren't homeless next weekend and Booking.com said we can invoice them after our stay finishes, so they can refund us the difference in cost between the original booking and the new one. Without your information on how property owners deal with Booking.com, I'm not sure the owner lady would have sorted this, so a big thank you from us. HB PS An email has just arrived from Booking.com. They confirm that the payment due won't be taken from my card - this was a concern obviously. I checked both my cards yesterday and I didn't make a payment from either of them when I booked. I couldn't remember when the problem happened because I made the booking a while back.
    • It's not for exactly £300 I just rounded the figure l. I don't know why I didn't respond to previous letter I suppose I thought If I ignored it it would go away.    I have uploaded all the docs I can find, I have defended the claim and will get a CPR sent to Morality Law today.    Claim Form.pdf
    • So as predicted relieved dq from Overdale.  Checked MCOL transaction history. Last entry is defence received.  Am I reading that correctly?   my understanding is I I ignore and wait for courts to send one they have also ticked mediation box. Not sure what can be mediated. He is unemployed 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 lots of Abbey charges to claim - advice please!


campino
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a current Abbey account with approx £800 worth of charges + interest to claim back.

 

I also have a closed account with approx £500 worth of charges + interest to claim. This old account ran from 1990-1999 but i kept all my statements so i have proof.

 

Do i make these claims indivudally or group them together? I am ready to go to the online court phase so want to make sure I get it right!

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Hello,

 

If you are ready for the court stage, then what have your initial approaches to Abbey asked for?

 

If you have only asked for one set of charges, then you can only put on set of charges on the court paperwork.

 

Have you considered the N1 for, instead of MCOL, if the older charges are being claimed, N1 may be better, as you can put more info in them. Just my opinion, but something else to consider

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your email

I have been in correspondence over the last few months with Abbey regarding my current account, with them predicatably stalling etc. I have copies of all the bank charges though so I am ready to go to the court stage with this.

 

I also have all the details of the bank charges on my closed account (1990-1999) as I kept all my statements.

 

So I just need to know whether I should combine them and treat it as one claim (I have all the details I need), or whether there is a reason I should treat them seperately (The current account charges are within 6 years, the close account run as far back as 1990)

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

You need to give some info as to exactly what you have already asked for from Abbey.

 

Have you sent anything that resembles an initial approach

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=78

 

 

and then anything like an LBA

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=78

 

 

If so, then your court paperwork has to relate to the figures previously asked for.

 

If you havn't sent anything like the above 2 letters, then you need to start with an initial approach.

 

Now to the question of what to claim. The 'over 6 years' issue has only recently been discussed, and I have not fully researched it. You need to have a godd look here. Yes, you will be advised, but its your claim, and you must be comfortable with what your doing, so its a case of research you claim. I will try to find the link to that thread.

 

Personally, My initial feeling is that I would treat them as 2 seperate claims, although that is being said without knowing the full details, and I wouldn't claim for both at the same time.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

the short answer is yes you can claim them all in one go, but read up on the stuff Louis suggested first :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...