Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The car makers used parts made by a supplier banned over alleged links to Chinese forced labour.View the full article
    • I need to get a hamster. lol
    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Logan V Natwest ****WON****


Logan21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You will both be ok guys.

Cobbetts are not a problem for us we are more than aquainted with them and their seeming lack of knowledge for Cpr.

 

Theres are a lot of cases now in the wings and they are going to be extremely busy in the next 4 weeks.

 

Will they turn up on the 10th ? lets wait and see.....in the meantime we can look at your cases if you are worried.

 

Logan I got your pm and am looking at that.

 

Theres actually 1 or two cases coming before yours so we will watch them.

It is possible Cobblers will make an offer or even settle before the 10th.

My guess is that would certainly give them time to read up on Cpr which is something they probably want to be doing...........:lol: :lol:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I not sure what I want really, think I would prefere to just get a settlement really for the full amount.

 

Nothing in the post this morning so, not to sure what I should do really.

 

Just sit tight i guess.

If I do give you advice please be aware of the following:

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

03/10/06 - NatWest Claim Settled in Full to the amount of £2344

 

09/10/06 - 2nd Natwest Claim - Pre Lim sent | Halifax CC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent | Natwest CC S.A.R Sent

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Logan.

 

I'm just behind you in this procedure, so it will be really interesting to see what happens over the next few days. At the moment I am just writing my refusal letter after they offered me £600 for a £1000 claim (plus costs).

 

PLUTOS

 

I not sure what I want really, think I would prefere to just get a settlement really for the full amount.

 

Nothing in the post this morning so, not to sure what I should do really.

 

Just sit tight i guess.

SNATCHWEST and NOBBETS no scare me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

 

I am getting concerned now, 1 week to go and I think i am going to be going to Court, have the other claims been settled yet?

If I do give you advice please be aware of the following:

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

03/10/06 - NatWest Claim Settled in Full to the amount of £2344

 

09/10/06 - 2nd Natwest Claim - Pre Lim sent | Halifax CC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent | Natwest CC S.A.R Sent

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Came home from work today. Letter confirming a cheque will be with me in 7 days.

 

get in my son.

 

Using that to go travelling/working in australia.

If I do give you advice please be aware of the following:

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

03/10/06 - NatWest Claim Settled in Full to the amount of £2344

 

09/10/06 - 2nd Natwest Claim - Pre Lim sent | Halifax CC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent | Natwest CC S.A.R Sent

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS !!!!!!!

Cobblers must be starting to move a little.

 

Dont inform the court until you get the cheque......and make sure they dont either !!

 

:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to phone them tomorrow. They want me to sign a agreement. So i might tell them i wont.

 

Dont think it matters to much, going to Aus on 25th Nov hopefully so

If I do give you advice please be aware of the following:

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

03/10/06 - NatWest Claim Settled in Full to the amount of £2344

 

09/10/06 - 2nd Natwest Claim - Pre Lim sent | Halifax CC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent | Natwest CC S.A.R Sent

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must also state in your letter that you will bring your letter to the attention of the courts as well as you will not agree to there terms of non disclosure

 

there are some interesting things happening now because the judges are looking for test cases to bring to the mercantile court

 

My court date which I should have today in the post has been set for a prelim hearing on the 4th october so either I should see a cheque very soon or .......

not quite sure

 

will keep you updated

 

Greg

 

 

Greg did you hear anything yet ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to phone them tomorrow. They want me to sign a agreement. So i might tell them i wont.

 

Dont think it matters to much, going to Aus on 25th Nov hopefully so

 

You may wish to consider signing if they make it beneficial to do so ????

 

ahem ...if you know what I mean ......:cool:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think he needs a stiff whiskey..............as he is still in shock.......:o

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys

 

HELP NEEDED!!!!!!!!!

 

Congrats Logan, enjoy the cash.

 

Just cutting in on the thread here to get some advice from the pros!!!!!

 

I have returned my AQ by 29 september, so have Cobblers. I took the standard approach of refusing to answer their further info request under cpr18. They have responded basically saying the particulars of claim do not properly particularise the claim. Accordingly, on allocation, they have suggested case management directions cannot be proposed until I serve a full and detailed reply to their request (case law, sections of acts relied on etc).

 

What have others done here - ignored, replied that I will wait for the court or replied detailing all the sections of acts and common law cases that I will be relying on? I have looked at a thread which has responded with all the above and then got paid out so should I take this tack or shut up shop and wait for the hearing date?

 

Everyones help most welcome.

 

Cheers

 

Heath

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry Heath.

 

We all get these.

Wtite a letter stating that as far as you are aware you have complied with their request. But that if there is specific information that they feel you have not supplied then can they point out what this is.

Remind them as the allocation is expected to remain in small claims then you have no obligations to fill in the part 18.

 

Send this to them recorded and also send a letter or call into your court telling them you have fulfilled all their requests but they maintain different.

 

on the bottom of your letter to Cobblers write "copy sent to Court "

 

will they never learn ????????

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin3030

 

Cheers for the reply, but I can't really say I have complied with their request as I've not elaborated on the POC. I was never asked to resubmit the fee schedule, just elaborate on the claim which I have refused to do under cpr 18 not applying.

 

Am I still within my rights to say as you posted last?

 

Heath

 

PS also on another thread I am now concerned that my claim is wrong in that I have claimed a business account plus 2 personal accounts. business account is a partnership account and not a limited company but I am concerned that this might cause me to fail?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have a look at the second points.

 

As regards the first ones.Presumably you sent the 2 schedules to the banlk in the earlier correspondence ?

If the banks replied to those then that is proof they did have the info.

Are there no claim partics on the claimform itself ?

 

What you maybe can do is fax over to Cobbetts

 

1. Account name number sort code

2. The spreadsheet.

3.a covering letter to remind them they should have all the claim partics from their client.

Keep a trans report and call Cobbetts to confirm delivery and get a name.

Send the letter (or you can fax that too )...to be put in your file .

I had to do both of these too........well I just did to cover myself knowing who we are dealing with...........

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards the Business account.

 

If the arrangement was that 1 or either could sign the cheques, then you are ok to claim as a partner.

If the account required both to sign,then you would need proof of his/her authorisation to claim.

 

The account as it is a partnership will presumably be in your names t/a.............

Where were the statements and other communica from them usually sent ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin3030

 

Thanks for your responses here.

 

On the first points, I'm probably not making myself clear.

 

I sent all the charges schedules and interest calcs as I should have. A lot of people seem to have been asked to resubmit these by Cobbetts. I have NOT been asked for this. I have just been asked to elaborate the POC with all the Acts, sections of acts, common law cases etc that I am relying on so they can file a proper defence. They have now asked me to respond for the second time on this point. Should I respond, as I know a thread which details this (in fact he amended his POC with agreement from Cobbetts), with all the info?

 

on the second points, either partner can sign and all correspondence was sent to the same address as the personal accounts. The cheque book doesn't state t/a, just the partnership name.

 

Cheers

 

Heath

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Heath

 

The claim partics on the claim form clearly give the legal refs.

But I know what you say.

In fact in their defence they would have referred to these ?????

 

As you know where this little bundle of words are then yes....get them out.

 

 

phew .......

 

You know you are ok for the business account too.

I have my own in with Barclays......their defence is no different to that of a current account

My own claim too relates to a former partnership accounr.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin3030

 

Thanks for that. I'll find that thread and dish the heavy legals on them and hopefully an offer will be forthcoming.

 

As an aside, I'm also talking to chris on the thread WINCHEST v Natwest and he has been advised by a moderator that a business account claim will not work. I've told chris to view this thread so if you could check out the WINCHEST thread and respond with a definate view I'm sure Chris would appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmnnn

 

But there have been plenty of settled business accounts already.......

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, I'm also talking to chris on the thread WINCHEST v NatWest and he has been advised by a moderator that a business account claim will not work. I've told chris to view this thread so if you could check out the WINCHEST thread and respond with a definate view I'm sure Chris would appreciate it.

 

I think that I may be the moderator that you are referring to so I just want to clarify this. Martin quite rightly states that plenty of business accounts have been settled already. What I actually said was that business claims should be kept separate to claims on personal accounts as they rely on different points of law. To clarify further, business claims cannot rely on consumer law which is used for making claims on personal accounts. I hope this clears the misunderstanding.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do i.

 

Have had my working visa pre approved my the Australian Government, so just need to buy my single ticket to get out there. Have found a ticket for £394 inc taxes.

 

Sweet.

If I do give you advice please be aware of the following:

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

03/10/06 - NatWest Claim Settled in Full to the amount of £2344

 

09/10/06 - 2nd Natwest Claim - Pre Lim sent | Halifax CC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent | Natwest CC S.A.R Sent

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...