Jump to content


Urgent - Assistance Reqd - welshuser v Lloyds


welshuser
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I went to court last week re my bank charges against Lloyds and won. Lloyds had nobody there to state their case and judgement was given in my favour. Now, today ive had a letter from the court as below and am worried about what I need to do or what is happening as I thought I had won the case (told that at the time by the Judge).

 

GENERAL FORM OF JUDGEMENT OR ORDER

 

Before HIS HONOUR ******** sitting at *********

 

Upon hearing the claimant in person and Counsel for the defendant

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1 Unless the Claimant do by 4.00pm on the 20th of April 2007 serve and file a schedule of bank charges for which reimbursement is claimed to include:

 

(i) Date of the Charge

 

(ii) The Amount

 

(iii) the reason for the charge as disclosed by the Defendant in for

example bank statements and

 

(iv) reason reimbursement is sought

 

then the claim be struck out without further order.

 

2 If the schedule is duly served, there be a stay until 4.00pm on the

18th May 2007

 

3 The Defendant shall serve an amended defence by 4.00pm on the first

of June 2007

 

4 The action be restored for a directions hearing at ****** at

 

Dated 26 march 2007

 

 

______________________________________________________________

 

Like I said I went to court, gave a breakdown of costs, no defendant was present and the Judge told me he will give me what I asked for and the moved onto the next case, so please, what does this mean? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Lloyds paid?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strange. If you've already had a judgement then its likely to be a mistake - I suggest you ring the court and ask.

 

If they can't tell you catagorically that its definately been sent in error, then you should comply with the order, just to be on the safe side. Certainly don't ignore it.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is asking for your schedule of charges and the reasons why they are unfair (ie, your POC)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks that way - very odd....have you called the court?

 

When did the judge say Lloyds had to pay by?

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like an error, but im contacting the guy who wrote it and will be back off leave next tuesday.....

 

weird that, and I panicked a bit because judgement in my case has already been given over a week ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...