Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

nima vs hsbc


nima21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 557
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

then she will have 2 cope with a grumpy me till ive been down the gym lol

im not arsed with women at the mo, after my last gf i just cant be arsed with them, im sure 90% of u are amazing but i attract the 10% lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

think you and my son should start a club! the 10% club

 

its gotta be done, i always find them lol

 

hope everyones well, just finished work, 3 nights down, 5 to go then 2 nights off, woo dippy hoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i am fuming

 

We refer to the above matter. You have refered your complaint about bank charges for determination in Court.

 

We are confident that HSBC's charges are fair,transparent and lawful.

 

Since you filed your claim in Court HSBC (along with a number of other banks) has become involved in legal proceedings with the Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") in relation to bank charges which we believe will resolve the legal issues regarding the fairness and legality of your bank charges.

 

We will be applying to the Court for an order to stay your action until resoloution of the bank's proceedings with the OFT.

 

Given the court case our client has also asked the Financial Ombudsman Services ("FOS") not to proceed with any other cases they are hearing until the test case is resolved. FOS has indicated that as a general proposition it will indeed not proceed with cases which rely on the legal issues being considered in the test case.

 

Our client asked the Financial Services Authority ("FSA") to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges complaints, and the FSA has agreed to this request subject to conditions that protect your rights.

 

We will keep you updated appropriately about the proceedings with the OFT. You can also check the latest position on our client's website at hsbc.co.uk

 

We can assure you we have registered and stored your complaint. Please retain your bank records, as this will make it easier for you to support your complaint on resolution of the test case. Once the legal proceedings between the OFT and the banks finish, our client will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible.

 

As a general matter,we will ensure that your claim will nto be adversely affected by the stay of your court proceedings.

 

Yours Faithfully

DG

DG Solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should! Application for removal of stay has to be looked at by a judge and valid reason given for not granting it.

Quote from pete castlebest

 

"

You have to, I think half the reasoning behind the courts doing this is to clear the bank claims out of the way, if you send in a request for the removal of the stay it means they have to look at it again and we dont go away.

 

pete"

Link to post
Share on other sites

glad we are all still laughin..........

 

nima, dear, in the cardiff gang they are apparently not charging for the application for removal of stays - so again it looks like court by court -

might want to add yours to Noddy's list:Courts & Stays

 

thanx lattie, mines on there, chichester court, although im sure they told me all claims there have been stayed, will find this out for sure

but al deffo gonna appeal, got a kick up the rear earlier so im eager to carry on with this:mad:

 

and molly what faults might these be?:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...