Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Vodafon.. anything that could be done?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It depends who made the charges and what they were for! You were obliged to complete the contract, so charges for those would be fair enough... it may have been the Debt Collectors who whacked on extra charges, but it is far easier to dispute them at the time, than pay it and try to get it back, as this would have nothing to do with Vodafone.

 

You're confusing Data Protection (DPA) with Consumer Credit (CCA) in this case, the latter doesn't apply as you hadn't applied for credit so it's not an issue. A good starting point if you want to take issue, is to make a SAR request with Vodafone which will tell you how much you owed them then the difference between this and what you paid to the Collections Agency. You can always chase them and say your figures show they asked for £X in excess of the debt, and if this is unreasonable, you can ask for it back. If they don't pay (and the charges were unreasonable) you MIGHT just have a case!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically, yes. I'm assuming you just paid what 1C asked you to to clear their pursuit of you? As far as Vodafone's part in the claim, if you don't complete the contract, they can terminate and then charge you for all the money they would have received had you paid them each month. However, apart from an early termination fee, I'm unaware of them adding punitive additional charges, the debt collectors usually do that. So once you get your SAR, you can see what they billed you for. Again, 1C can add a reasonable amount for their pursuit of you, but it is easier to challenge them at the outset and say you'd like them to supply a copy of your (Vodafone) contract, which very often they cannot provide, and they stop chasing you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is interesting - can you clarify the bit 'the debt was given'....

 

This implies they sold the debt on to 1st Credit. If this is the case only write to them to challenge it and to ask for a copy of your agreement because you dispute not only the amount but their involvement. This may bring the matter to a screeching halt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to assure themselves that the request is from the person who actually requests it, and a copy of your passport is reasonable to some as proof of ID, however, it also provides much more, your picture, DoB (which to my mind is none of their business anyway) your ethnicity etc etc.

 

Still, there's nothing stopping you saying you don't have a passport! A good approach is to make a statement on the form saying;

 

"My address (above) is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable, I would therefore suggest this, along with a copy of a recent utility bill provides adequate proof of identity.".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I think she was looking after your interests, as there was little need to charge you for a SAR if her actions were acceptable to you in resolving the matter. You are of course entitled to insist she processes your SAR, but you may not get the information you seek, as it will only provide confirmation of the records held by them in your name, and how much you SHOULD have paid (rather than what you actually paid) will not be evident from this.

 

Asking for a breakdown of the unexpired contract charges is your next step, as you simply want a statement on the calculation to prove that it is correct. Once you have this, if it still doesn't tally, you can request an adjustment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maria,

Your original contract won't be all that important - a specimen copy of the terms and conditions can be read or downloaded as a PDF from the Vodafone website - although it is buried in the section detailing the small print. You could always ask for a copy (nicely) as you've mislaid your original version of it.

 

The request for an adjustment arises if you've identified you've overpaid them for the contract (say they've charged for longer than the contract minimum term). If they've not made a mistake, this will not arise, but with so few folk challenging final figures, its sometimes worthwhile doing this. Explain that in view of the earlier errors, you just want to be sure...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

There's little point in banging you hear - if you've asked, then they're still obliged to response and it CAN take ages for non-critical complaints. What is is you want them to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right - Vodafone took over Singlepoint.

 

No reason to tear your hair out - all a statement would do is show you the date and the amount. What you were wanting was a breakdown of charges on the last bill, as to why it was for such a high amount. Once you have this, you will be better placed to decide on the next steps to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is if they don't supply it - the only action left for you is to raise an action for disclosure, if they don;t have the data (and this appears likely) a SAR would not be constructive. Have you tried phoning her directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only want the info - it's not rocket science. Explain that you just needed to know how the £700 was calculated. Have pen handy (or record the call - even better!). If they cannot, suggest that it is really unfair that they cannot substantiate their claim, and ask her to revise it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just this - irrespective of who owned the company, it does have a legal obligation to retain the data for legal and tax purposes (could be up to 6 years). Whilst you might accept Singlepoint was a separate entity before being subsumed into Vodafone, you have been seriously financially disadvantaged by SinglePoint's actions, and you are being denied the opportunity to inspect the information and be satisfied it is correct. Also, since Singlepoint may have provided adverse credit data to a CRA, and you are unable to have the data verified, you'd like all adverse data added to your account by Singlepoint to be removed immediately as a token of goodwill, and you look forward to the enhanced data as and when it appears.

 

(It then goes without saying you reserve the right to challenge any figures you feel are misleading, unfair or inaccurate).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If that's an itemisation - I'm a monkey's uncle.

 

However, you can still approximate on what they've given you.

 

1) When was the contract taken out and ceased? Is the August 2004 date correct?

 

2) Was there actually two handsets on two contracts, or one contract covering two handsets?

 

To work out what you really owe them, you take the number of months you paid away from your minimum commitment. You then multiply the remaining monthly fee until the contract would have ended to arrive at the amount owing. Do this for each phone. If there is a rebate for the non use of inclusive minutes, this will be in your favour and lower the bill from the original amount due.

 

If these totals exceed the amount being asked, pay need to pay it with good grace, however if your totals are less than what they are charging, write back and say that their charges appear unreasonable, pointing to your calculations and asking for the matter to be looked into again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...