re HSBC-No A Q rec'd??but a letter from DG***WON***

[nettyg]

i think you really need to phone mcol - if you haven't received any paperwork, i'm wondering if you input your correct address - it does seem a little strange! quote your claim number when you ring them and explain that you have received nothing at all.

[nettyg]

hi squashy... this is what you need (don't panic you're doing absolutely fine) everybody gets twitchy over section G.

 

Allocation Questionnaires - A guide to completion

New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

 

and section G:

 

The Claimant proposes the attached Draft Order for Directions, for the courts due consideration. If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objectives to be futhered in that they will fully identify the most fundametal issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this caim may proceed justly and expeditiously.

 

The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendant as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendant cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and Common Law principles established since the early 1900's.

 

In the event that the Defendant's charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the Small Claims Track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

[nettyg]

please excuse my typo's!!