Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

My Mother's house was reposessed today by our local council. She and my 11 year old Sister are staying with relatives tonight and then moving into our house tomorrow. It is my Mum's fault to be honest. They have tried getting in touch with her plenty of times but she has been ignoring them and has had her head buried in the sand since losing my Dad to Cancer a few years ago. She has been depressed and ignored a lot of the letters.

 

She owes around £2,400 in rent arrears but was paying £70 rent per week +£9 extra toward the arrears which was deemed acceptable. At Christmas she missed a couple of weeks payments and this has lead to the current situation.

 

I was told by the guys reposessing the house that if I had known about the situation and spoken to them even five minutes before the reposession began they could have sorted something out.

 

I have asked if I could pay the £2,400 in full today to stop it happening but the reposession had started and so it was too late. I was told that I could pay the ammount and then it would be up to the descretion of somebody in our local council buildings. I went to speak to her and she denied that It was her decision to make and that it was unlikely that we could keep my Mum's house even if I paid the arrears and paid the next few months rent in advance and set up a direct debit to my own bank account or even use my own house as a guarantee.

 

We know that this has not been their fault, but it seems harsh that a depressed widow trying to raise a little girl on her own will be evicted from the house she raised her family with as it is the home she shared her life with my Dad with before he passed away.

 

Is there any way that this can be overturned seeing as I can pay the arrears in full?

 

Thank you for any advice you can give us.

 

UtterlyScrewed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Utterlyscrewed sorry to hear your news, I was in court lately where LA's asked for tennants to be evicted and the judge always asked if kids where in the house, where there was he refused, he seemed very nice and not what you expect. I dont know how to advise on this but will ask for someone to come along and offer advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh God, my heart goes out to you all. Even more so, because I cannot advise on any sure-fire steps which you could take to remedy this situation. All I know is that you have to act quickly and make a lot of noise in your housing dept as your mum's house can be allocated to other HA tenant.

In myopinion plead, write, call, buy flowers and chocolate, see your MP.

Tell them that if your mum is not given her home back, she will only be back to the housing dept to present herself as homeless. Do not let them convince you that she would be found "intentionally homeless"- this is where the local authority claims that it was your mum's fault. Do not think that yourself either! Depression is often underestimated in its overwhelming power. Get your mum's GP on your side. Get few days off work, you have a lot of calls and visits to make. Find your councillor's surgery times- go and waive the chequebook.

 

Even if your was evicted legally, there are some circumstances where she can apply to court to be allowed to move back in. However, it is rare for this to happen. Therefore get your mum to see a solicitor. Find one here: The Directory

do not forget to tick "LSC Funded Provider" (legal aid).

 

 

Keep us posted, our fingers are crossed.

  • Haha 2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know much about tenancy law. Are you in England or Scotland? I agree that whatever you do, do it quickly. Getting in touch with your MP imediatley is also a good idea - he/she can lean on the housing people. I'm afraid I also agree that it may well be too late, and that your mother may have to start afresh somewhere new. :(

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry to hear what has happened, good luck with everything.

NatWest

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 02/01/07

Statements received - 15/01/07

Prelim sent - 24/01/07

LBA sent - 15/02/07

Claim filed in court - 20/03/07

Court date received for 26th June - 01/06/07

Received offer for full & final settlement from Cobbetts - 22/06/07:D :D

 

 

Capital One

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - 26/06/07

Statements received - 03/07/07

Prelim letter sent - 17/07/07

Letter received - 07/08/07 - WON!!:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

I'm sorry to read this, remember tomorrow is a new day, and it will not look half as bad, I had my home repossessed (I was simple broke at the time) and I felt like the world was falling in failed family etc, but it is the truth one door closes and an other opens, so chin up.

 

I would give shelter a call, they are the experts on this, as basally the council have a duty to the homeless, I just do not know how that works in these cases.

 

Shelter's free national helpline Shelter England: the housing and homelessness charity

 

If you need advice and help in an emergency and you are not sure what to do, phone Shelter's free national helpline on 0808 800 4444 to talk to a housing adviser who can:

  • explain your rights
  • tell you your options
  • tell you what (if anything) is available in your area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they have a court order to do this? I believe that they should have, and if this is the case I suggest you contact the court to tell them that you will pay the money. I don't know if this will work. Now the eviction has taken place I guess it will be harder to get your Mums home back than it would have been to keep her in it.

 

I don't know if this will help or not, but I work for a Housing Association (although not directly on the housing side of it), and I know that people wanting transfers to other houses will not be considered if they owe money. I mention this as I wonder if it might be worth paying the arrears anyway to help get her somewhere else to live. Even if she was housed by a different LA or HA, I believe they would want a reference from her former landlord, and she will fare much better if she has no outstanding arrears.

 

Please do not take my word on this as this is merely a bit of info I've picked up along the way, and I wouldn't want you to spend all that money unnecessarily. I believe a letter from her GP would also carry some weight.

 

Good luck and best wishes to you all. My heart goes out to your Mum and little sister. She must be at a loss to understand what is going on.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone who replied.

 

We went to an advice centre today near where we live (similar to C.A.B.) and they were absolutely fantastic. I don't want to get too carried away here and think we have cracked it, but they have now said that if we pay the arrears (£2,400) and 12 weeks rent in advance (£63pw) plus she signs the tennancy agreement over to me so I look after the rent in future then they can move back in in a week or two.

 

So far, due to the kindness of neighbours and relatives we have about £2,000 and a couple of relatives are looking to cash in shares tomorrow for the rest.

 

We are not there yet, but I feel a lot better than I did this time yesterday. I cried in bed last night. I've just left my Mum with tears of relief running down her face. What a difference a day makes.

 

On a side note, I have told the guy who dealt with us that I would like to volunteer some of my time to help them out, even if it would be just distributing leaflets to raise awareness. My girlfriend works for a credit card company and she has decided to leave and look for a job with the C.A.B. or even just start off with voluntary work for a similar organisation.

 

Thanks again for all of your encouragement.

 

Now I can't wait to get stuck into the next job. Capital One I think.

 

UtterlyScrewed

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fantastic. I thought that if it could be paid it might help. I hope it perks your Mum up to realise what a fantastic supportive family she has. If she hasn't seen the doctor about her depression do try and encourage her to do so. I know from personal experience that it is an horrendous illness, but once you face the fact you have a problem, there is help available.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fantastic. I thought that if it could be paid it might help. I hope it perks your Mum up to realise what a fantastic supportive family she has. If she hasn't seen the doctor about her depression do try and encourage her to do so. I know from personal experience that it is an horrendous illness, but once you face the fact you have a problem, there is help available.

 

She has been to the Doctor today mate. She is going to start going to Counselling. It looks like this whole thing has been a blessing in disguise now. The arrears are being sorted out once and for all, Mum has admitted she needs help and hopefully we can get together and buy the house with the right to buy so that her and my Sisters future will be financially secured.

 

I am dropping off to sleep as I am typing after my sleepless night last night.

 

Haha. It's been worth it though.

 

Thank you all once again.

 

I hope somebody else can read this discussion and realise that the sooner they share their problems with their family, the sooner things will get sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know I had a funny feeling it would have a positive outcome. That is great. Well done you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very happy for you and utterly astonished. It is very rare that tenant is allowed back after eviction. You mudt have great powers of persuasion!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone needs any help with this sort of situation I would be happy to help.

 

I was a manager of the rents department for my local council until a year ago when I got the opportunity to ditch the day job for a job in web-development.

 

Local authorities will, after eviction and arrears repaid, allow the tenant back into the home almost immediatelly as it saves them money on void tenancy work. The tenancy agreement will not be a secure tenancy it it was previously (if this was the existing terms) , and could be an introductorty tenancy or and assured shorthold tenancy.

 

Regards

 

Thrax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thrax- very interesting thanks for that. Is this something in practice nationally or just locally? Is there any specific guidance or just a discretion or good practice? How much hassle is a “void” work? Is this a strong argument?

I am ever so grateful for your comments as currently I have two tenants in a very similar situation to UtterlyScrewed’s mum’s one and there is no networking relationship between advice agencies and housing dept in my local authority.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joa,

 

It depends on the landlord. Once the warrant has been executed the tenancy is terminated.

 

If the landlord is a local authority, authorites have a duty to find alternative accomodation for a period of 28 days.

 

If, very soon following the eviction, the arrears can be cleared in full, the landlord could, at their discretion grant you a new tenancy in the same property. It is very unlikely that they will have someone who is ready to move in the following day.

 

Before any tenant is allowed into a property, there is "void" work that needs to be carried out, which costs the authority both time and money, before the property can become let, and therefore income gained.

 

Gas safety checks, and a full electrical test must be carried out. Removal of furniture and other remedial works that are required to bring the property to a lettable standard. If property is left in the dwelling, the authority must record every item in the dwelling, attribute and approx price. If property of value is left at the dwelling, the authortiy must securely store your possessions.

 

All this adds up to lots of money, and a lot of time. You could argue with the authority that it would save them a lot of money if they let you back into the property with all arrears paid. This is of course at the discretion of the landlord.

 

Good Luck

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The housing association that I work for offers tenants leaving property vouchers (possibly 100.00 I think) if they leave the place in good order. I believe the average cost of a void property before re-letting is, on average over 1,000.00, so it can save quite a bit if left in good order and allows the property to be let quicker, although gas checks etc still have to be done.

 

Everything is done to avoid a property being empty, so I agree with what Thrax says.

  • Haha 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I just thought I'd add something on to this . . .

 

There is a massive ammount of investment about to be pumped into the town where we live, creating plenty of leisure, recreational and shopping facilities and of course the jobs that come with them. It's great news for this place, but as I predicted back then, the local authorities are evicting an astonishing number of people. More than ever before.

 

I really think that the value of property is going to rocket here, so if you have the right to buy they will evict you as soon as you give them a chance, meaning that whatever extra value added to the property is theirs, not yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What town are you talking about?

 

Kirkby on Merseyside mate.

 

Everton Football Club are going to build a new Stadium here and Tesco want to build a new Superstore. There are rumours of Planet Hollywood, a Casino, Cinema and other businesses.

 

There is not a great deal here at the moment and housing has always been pretty cheap until this news surfaced. Now prices are increasing and new businesses have started moving in already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...