Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bankchargesnotus V Yorkshire Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Claiming initially £1727.00 and £2127.00 from Yorkshire Bank from two separate (open) accounts

 

Sent DPA Letters 16/11/2006

Received statements 13/12/2006

Sent Request for repayment of charges 18/12/2006

Reply received 27/12/2007 - Pretty much expected telling me to go away !!!!

Sent LBA on 06/02/2007 - Bit of a delay as ill for three weeks with tonsilitis (twice) - Lame excuse I know.

Recieved letter saying "Reopening your complaint" dated 13/02/2007 - Stating they hope to respond to my complaint shortly.

Hear nothing again in the time leading up to 14 day deadline so trotted along to my local county court on 26/02/2007 and filed my money claim.

Claim was issued by court on 27/02/2007

Claimed for the two amounts (accounts) together which is £3854 plus 8% £946.73 totalling £4800.73

Letter reeived dated 02/03/2007 with cheque enclosed for £1927.00, (exactly half of the £3854) strangely the cheque was dated 26/02/2007 so not sure if cheque had already been raised before they got my court papers.

Photocopied the cheque and sent it back on 05/03/2007 along with template letter saying thanks but no thanks.

Got a letter from Court on 15/03/2007 stating that YB had filed an acknowledgement of service on 12/03/2007.

Solicitors acting for the defendant are Clydesdale Bank Plc T/A Yorkshire Bank, Legal Services, Glasgow.

Recieved

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("654503") report.gif progress.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything as usual then. Thanks for the update and well done on getting this far.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT will make no difference whatsoever in my opinion, or at least not for a long time. You might find the Whistleblower programme tomorrow of interest to your case though.:p

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro, thats a relief. Whistblower been set for Sky plus for days!!!

 

I know its pretty much how long is a piece of string but unfortunately couldn't go back to work after having my son so in dire need of cash at the mo, when I got the first offer I thought full offer wouldn't be too far behind, now not so sure, any indication you can give me about how long it may take, shortest to longest from the stage i'm at would be much appreciated, would be great to pay off a few bills!!!!

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, in my case I did my court claim in June and got my money at the end of January, but they don't all take quite that long.

 

Don't count on it until it's in your hand.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received a Notice that a defence has been filed this morning bit baffled by the wording, anyone seen this before????????:|

 

You have already been sent a copy of a defence received from the defendants in this claim (which I have). The time for all the defendants to file their defences has now elapsed and I am enclosing an allocation questionnaire for you to complete. No further defences have been recieved.

 

My other one simply said the defendant has filed a defence, a copy of which is enclosed!!!

 

Any comments greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it just means you need to complete the AQ, but just carefully read it again to make sure you haven't missed anything. Maye different court staff do things slightly differently, but just ring the court and check if you have any doubts about what is required.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the following draft orders for directions with your allocation questionnaire which includes a request for disclosure of CYNthesys:

 

 

 

 

 

In the XXXXX County Court

Claim Number XXXXXX

Between

 

 

XXXXXX – Claimant

And

Clydesdale Bank PLC T/A Yorkshire Bank

 

 

 

Draft Order for Directions

The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send to the Defendant and to the Court:

  • a) A schedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount, and reason given (if any) for that charge being made;


  • b) Copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made;


  • c) A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise;


  • d) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.


If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

 

 

2. The Defendant shall within 14 days thereafter file and serve a response to the Claimant's schedule, stating in respect of each item claimed;

  • a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;


  • b) Whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty, and if not why not;


  • c) If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions (whether or not such action is treated as a breach of contract between the parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such was a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was including disclosure of CYNthesys, the defendant's costs analysis system ;


  • d) If such charge is not alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions then facts and matters intended to be relied upon showing the basis upon which the charge was calculated and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to show that the charge was fair and reasonable.


  • f) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.


If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filled my AQ to reach them for 13 April (Not due until 23).

 

Opened an envelope this morning from Clydesdale Bank, Legal Services offering me £3924 plus court costs, it states that

'No offer is made in respect of interest as that is awarded only at the discretion of the Court, and in our view the Court would not exercise its discretion to award interest in your favor given that the charges were levied as a result of your own actions and failures'

 

It states the offer is Without Prejudice save as to costs.

 

The interest totals nearly £1000 alone so not taking this offer will pop in chat room for best advice but any thoughts much appreciated.

 

One thing I did notice though is they are offering £3924 when I only claimed (without the interest) £3854, and they are offereing the £120 court costs which I did not pay or include on the claim for cos I get WTC.

 

I did ring the court today to see if they have submitted their AQ which is due 23 April, they have not as yet and I checked with court they they do not know I have submitted mine, I am assuming from this letter they have sent this pre AQ so they dont need to bother.

 

Getting closer, can almost smell the money!!!!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Bank,

 

It would be your choice to settle - or to go for the rest and I personally would argue for the rest!

 

I would personally turn down the offer and send the refusal letter.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

Without prejudice is not admitting liability so its up to you whether you take the money and run, or like everyone else stand your ground!

 

good luck.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

'No offer is made in respect of interest as that is awarded only at the discretion of the Court, and in our view the Court would not exercise its discretion to award interest in your favor given that the charges were levied as a result of your own actions and failures'

 

What a load of rubbish. If the court would take this view then why does YB not continue to court? Surely if the charges are a result of your actions then why dont they go to court and argue that? Oh I know.. the charges are unlawful penalties!!! Interesting that they dont state their charges to be fair and transparent.

 

 

Just continue for the full amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you send a rejection letter or just ignore their letter, I saw someone on here with YB ignored their offer at this stage and they sent the full offer the following week.

 

And if they dont make the full offer soon could this go on for quite a while yet? I know i'm closer to the end that the beginning but it still feels like a really long way off.

 

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi again,

 

Send the letter of rejection off Banks.

 

This gives the bank written notice that you have rejected the offer, just saying nothing they may assume that you have accepted.

 

Everything in writing is a good idea!

 

The link for the template is above.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned court today just to check they had submitted their AQ to them and they have not, court admin are going approach judge to issue a unless order giving them an extra 5 days or their defence will be struck out.

 

It does really make me laugh though them getting the extra five days, we wouldn't as inidividuals if we had not submitted on time but they who are staffed by hundreds or even thousands in some cases, get extra time!!!:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you had their AQ, so I would think the courts would have been sent one at the same time.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can take several weeks for the judge to look at AQ's depending on any backlogs they may have. Don't start holding your breath just yet.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...