Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pjgodman 'v' Abbey


pjgodman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guys,

 

I received a copy of the Abbey's Defence through the post Saturday 10th denying that it owes me any money and that the tariff of charges were sent to me on more than one occasion.

 

They also state that, and get this, 'The fees charged reflect and are proportionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred due to the Claimant's breach of contract'.!!!

 

They also dispute that I am entitled to interest.

 

They say as well that I never supplied proof of where I got these totals from, which I did twice.

 

Included with this defence is an offer of 50% of the fees which is offered as full and final payment. (Which beggers belief!!!)

 

What should I do, or have any of you had this before?...

 

Thanks for any help in advance

 

PG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Michael,

 

I have used one of those before and accepted a partial payment and let them know I would be pressing on with my claim.

 

The defence has come from their Solicitor, and the offer direct from the bank!!!!.

 

I will sending a 'thanks' but 'no thanks' letter back.

 

What should I expect from the "Allocation Questionaire"? which is coming shortly, and how far does that put me away from my day in court?

 

PG

Link to post
Share on other sites

pjgodman,

They also state that, and get this, 'The fees charged reflect and are proportionate to the Defendant's administrative expenses incurred due to the Claimant's breach of contract'.!!!
So let them prove it !!

The defence has come from their Solicitor.
That's a new one. Since last September when they stopped using a legal firm and started doing things in-house, things seem to be signed by James Arrandale who isn't a solicitor - he's a "legal officer", and not a very good one IMO - eg he stated to me that "Abbey is not obliged to disclose the basis of their charges" (tell that to the Judge) and that "Directions are not required in the Small Claims Court" (tosh) !

 

You can keep the AQ simple, or you can add in reference to, say, the Lincoln abuse of process case and the fact that Abbey always settle prior to Court (listing the claim numbers), and/or attach some draft Directions for the Judge to consider issuing to both parties (which he'll do anyway, even if you don't suggest any). Whatever you do, Abbey will then wait for your Court bundle and then settle. They only seem to kick up about "complications" like claims >6yrs, interest other than 8% statutory and removal of defaults. What interest are you claiming ? Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mick,

 

It is James Arrandale, thanks for bringing that to my attention....

 

I am claiming statatory interest at 8%, for which I originally used a calculation sheet from The 'Money Savings Expert' site. So I entered the charge date, and it worked out the interest.

 

Since then, they have given me £670 by way of a Good Will Gesture, which I took off the claim before filling in the form N1, and re-calculated the interest accordingly.

 

I hope this was the right thing to do?!?!

 

PG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...