Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Trust Bank


big aid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have been posting on various threads until now but i will give a brief rundown of my progress so far

 

10th march- DPA request letter sent to local branch

 

18th april - local branch reply said basically you got your statements and charges were as per price list

 

20th april -i sent letter saying clock is ticking

 

26th april - received request for £10 saying only limited info available

 

28th april - sent £10 and letter saying clock is still ticking and full info or statements needed

 

9th may - received info they sent under DPA. totally inadaquate, lots of letters and handwritten notes but only a printout of the last few months similar to what can be got from online banking.

 

11th may - phoned data protection officer and was told that due to tha "Durant" case i was not antitled to info held on microfiche as it was not a relevant filfig system.

 

11th may - phoned info commisioner and they said almost the exact same thing. except that i maybe should have got more than a printout of the last 2 months because there should be more than this on their computer system.

 

15th may - i sent a letter threatening info commissioner and county court for non disclosure

 

18th may - letter received today saying that their position remains the same

 

ANYONE WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR ANSWERS PLEASE FEEL FREE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Big Aid

These guys sound like a right bunch of tossers!!

 

Why not just add up the amount of charges for the number of months they gave you,and multiply by the relevant number to get a total for 72 months,slap in a claim for that and let them prove otherwise!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

spoke yesterday to info commissioner

they said that they are fairly powerless even if they find that i haven't been given the correct info. even then it would still take a court judgement to force them into giving out all of the correct information.

 

how do i start a county court case to force the bank into giving me all of the details that they have.

 

is there a thread or link

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you check in the library i think there is some info on how to claim using an estimate, i think in previous cases if you have overestimated the charges the banks don't be too long in telling you and providing the list of charges. Good Luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Aid

if it were me,I would slap in a county court action to force disclosure(I believe the details are in the FAQ'S-or post in the general forum about how to go about it and some of the mods may be able to point the way you should go,and then estimate a figure for charges(keeping it under the small claims limit) and hit them with it.They will then most probably and miraculously find a way to provide the information you originally asked for.

 

I am looking at this scenario with the Northern-tomorrow week is the DAP deadline for them,and I already have a parachute account ready should things turn nasty!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

good luck with your claim. just looked on AIB who own first trust in the south

they charge just €6.35 for returned items though they do charge fee for running

account. still a lot cheaper than £30.00 though. wonder how £30.00 is fair under

law yet only €6.35 in the south. eu law on unfair terms applies there too as it does

in uk under UTCCR.

Data Protection Act sent to Nationwide 19/05/06.

Statements received 24/06/06 - Charged £1,954.50 :eek:

Prelim letter sent to Charles Bacon 27/06/06 :)

Cannot refund letter from Sarah Watson 07/07/06 :rolleyes:

L.B.A. sent to Charles Bacon 18/07/2006 ;)

Claim deemed filed 30/08/2006 8)

* REFUND TIME * 15/09/2006 :p

*£1945.50 + £443.37 interest + £62.00 Court fees*

** DONATION MADE **

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if you have received the info yet, but my statements came in the mail this week with no further requests to the first trust, i hope you get the info soon and hopefully they are now changing there procedure and providing the info as requested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at last my good friends at first trust have come to their senses and sent me copy statements for the 6 years, saving us a day in court.

a quick run through them leads me to a figure of somewhere around £1800.

 

no work for 5 days now so i am going through them very carefully

 

thanks to everyone for your support getting over this first hurdle

Link to post
Share on other sites

just received an acknowledgement stating their investigating procedure

they say that it could be 4-8 weeks for a full investigation

 

do i write to them explaining that we are moving forward on my timetable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Big Aid

My guess is that you will get your reply next week. They were very quick to respond to me. But you know to stick to your timetable of 14 days from the date they would have got the letter.

Cheers

Flo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys...

 

Been watching this thread with great interest.

 

I sent Two DPA requests (and two Cheques) last week, and having a legal qualification I inserted my letters after my name. (should be interesting to see if I get treated any different then the rest). The two cheques have already been cashed, so I await in anticipation...

 

Good luck to All and I will keep you informed..

 

Bru

:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

the letters after your name may force them into a position where they know that no crap will be accepted. have you any legal knowledge or experience of this type of case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't want to say in case they are reading these forums, But you more than wlecome to PM me.. if its any good to you...

 

Did speak to a bank official who works in Ann Street in an unofficial capacity at a function the other night.... they are not happy campers at the minute

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Just an update...

 

Recived package from First Trust Bank Today, all 170 pages will take some time to go through.

 

Dear Mr ***** *********

 

RE: Data Protection Request

 

I refer to your letter dated 20th June 2006 and enclosed herewith statements for the period 30/11/2000 to 30/5/5006 and 3/9/2001 to 16/5/2006.

 

Details of the manual interventions you requested are not held on a relevant filing system.

 

if you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

yours sincerely

 

Pat McIntyre

Data Protection Officer

Regulatory Compliance.

 

8 days......

Must say I'm impressed

(Wonder was it because I signed my letter LLB ??)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...