Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They haven't got a litigation department - it's all Kev!  So if you don't pay, Kev will pass the matter to Kev.  OK. Not exactly a threat that will stop you sleeping at night.
    • Sorry, but I agree with Plymouth Council as stated in their letter.  Based on their description of their incident. If you disagree, exactly why do you believe the Council have been negligent ?   Does your wife have any disability that the sports centre staff were aware of and they were offering assistance to her during her visit to the centre ? If you feel you have a case, go to a local no win no fee personal injury Solicitors. 
    • Hi Sorry for uploading them wrong. Im not technical at all and self taught so bear with me as im trying my best. Thank you for all the info regarding the signs, this was my thoughts as well. Yes they have changed teh signs since this happened Ill ahve to have a look back through and see if when I took the pictures they were already the new ones or I have the old ones. I cant remember off hand. With regards to Europarks running the site now, Just to make you aware there is another small retail park just across the road and Im sure they are Europarks. The shops within that park are just Aldi and B & M. The site that we received the NTK has a few more shops, Home bargains, The food Warehouse, M & S food and a few others. I put these for identififcation purposes just in case it is the other site that you were looking at. The main entrance sign is on the bend on the left as you drive in the entrance so when you drive in from the right and turn in you can see it in front of you but if you drive in from the other way as we do then you dont see it unless you know its there and as you say you would have to stop to read it al anywayl. The main thing that always jumped out at us was FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in large letters. Please find the notice of hearing date attached and an offer letter I received from the vultures DCBLegal this morning,    notice of allocation group nexus.pdf vulture offer letter re group nexus.pdf
    • Good Afternoon Stu,  Many thanks for your reply. I will do as you suggest and email them for the exact terms. I shall have a look through the Tenancy Agreement too  myself  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Kingmils Vs Morgan and Stanley


kingmils
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

Just to let you know it seems that i have another easy success story.

 

However i have not received the official letter yet. Read on!!!

 

15.01.07 sent SAR

18.01.07 received letter from Karla Kenny looking into it bla bla bla.

30.01.07 called them to ask for update spoke to Paul Mulholland and said that they are dealing with complaint.

14.01.07 received letter from Colin Kelly with copies of statements and offer of difference between £20 and £12.

20.01.07 called Colin Kelly told happy to accept but will pursue remainder. He asked if I have worked out my figures and if so to give them to him for him to speak to his manager Carla Kenny. I gave him full amount of charges plus 8% plus the Contractual % Rate. He said that She will respond with outcome within 2 weeks.

Deadline 06/03/07.

6.03.07, no response so I called colin Kelly on 0800 028 8990 spoke to Trever he said letter went out on 27 feb 07, ( not received ) so I ask if he would read the letter to me and it says they now offer the full amount of charges and 8% in full final settlement. Ask for a copy to be sent to me.

 

I now wonder if i can calim C.I. as Redsonja?

 

I shall keep you informed.

 

 

Many Thanks.:-D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think you can claim CI after you have accepted an amount in full settlement.

 

Yes you will be offered charges+8%.

 

They will regard this as a bit of a result as you will be letting them keep all the interest you paid on their unlawful charges.

 

Karla and her friends will be smirking at each other, humming "Money for Nothing" for the rest of the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want them to return all the money they've unlawfully deprived you of, you need to let them know you are serious and start legal action for the full amount + court costs+ all other costs+ court interest.

 

Full amount= charges+ contractual interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi noomill,

 

i havent actually accepted there offer. i have ask them to resend the letter as i have not received it yet.

 

In regards to the interest that i can calim wht is the daily rate theat i should be charging?

 

Please let me know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to everone,

 

Good news regarding Morgan.

 

Finally received that missing offer letter today.

 

They now agree to refund all the charges plus 8%.

 

I spoke to the same gentleman who resent the letter as I wanted the amendments to their terms of acceptance change. See Thread Redsonja.

He went away to confirm the amendments with his superviser and returned a couple of minutes later saying my amendments were all fine apart from requesting that the cheque be sent in seven days. They said no to that as they cant rely on the postal service however he said he will call me to confirm the cheque has been sent once they receive the amended terms of acceptacnce.

 

So posting off today and waiting for cheque!

 

Will keep you informed.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fab news Kings, well done! Go and spend it all at once! :D

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...