Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PC world - double check their prices


Bernie B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi- Hope this appropriate, sort of half a complaint/half advice.

 

Our insurance company gave us Currys/PCW vouchers to replace a damaged laptop. We were gutted that we had to take our custom to PCW (having had a terrible experience from them years ago), but swallowed our pride and checked out the website to pick a new laptop.

Found a Compaq Presario (C542EA) with an instore price of £499 that we decided to go for. Went to the store an hour later, and were shocked to see it for sale at £599.

 

When we finally got hold of a salesperson we queried the price. He tried to fob us of with, 'maybe you made a mistake and £499 was the web price', but we insisted we were right and he went of to check with someone.

 

Lo and behold, 3 minutes later he returned, said we were right and changed the price on the ticket with a pen! Hey presto - instant instore £100 saving :D

 

Assume if we hadn't checked on line, PCW would have had the extra £100 off us, not to mention the £100s of uneeded/overpriced extras, that because my other half is an IT wizz we were able to fob off or knew we could buy far cheaper elsewhere.

 

Of course, now having read a lot of the posts in this thread, we waiting in dread for it to break down the day after the warranty runs out....;-)

 

Bernie.

:D:D:DHalifax settled in full:

£562 in charges

06/02/07 - Sent preliminary letter recorded delivery to branch.

10/02/07 - Recieved 'passed to complaints dept' letter from

branch assistant manager.

20/02/07 - Sent LBA recorded delivery to branch.

22/02/07 - Recieved letter from complaints dept offering £444.

Called in person to reject and was offered full amount there and then. Posted back amended acceptance form.

:)Donated 5% of money recieved because I would never have got my money back without this site - please do the same when (not if!) you get yours back too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of advice, you do not have to accept the insurance companys vouchers.

Tell them you don't want to deal with PCWorld/curry/dixons etc, and go to an independant dealer.

 

Pref one who is a member of NASCR.

I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darn, knew I should've checked here first. Will know for next time and remember CAG is here for more than just bank charges advice ;)

:D:D:DHalifax settled in full:

£562 in charges

06/02/07 - Sent preliminary letter recorded delivery to branch.

10/02/07 - Recieved 'passed to complaints dept' letter from

branch assistant manager.

20/02/07 - Sent LBA recorded delivery to branch.

22/02/07 - Recieved letter from complaints dept offering £444.

Called in person to reject and was offered full amount there and then. Posted back amended acceptance form.

:)Donated 5% of money recieved because I would never have got my money back without this site - please do the same when (not if!) you get yours back too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sometimes we miss labels, it happens in all stores and it is ALWAYS worthwhile checking prices on the website or whatever when you are buying high ticket price items. Was the price coming up when scanned into the computer, or was the guy just quoting from the label on the item? It would probably been a surprise for him too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the guy was just quoting the price straight off the label, then he wasn't a very good floor assistant. A good floor assistant ascertains from where the customer thinks they got the different price, then checks that source, then scans through the till/checks the system. Just quoting shows the customer that you're either lazy or not bothered. In my many years of experience in retail, I've found 'my way' to be the most customer-based solution, and often the quickest, too.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh I fully agree, was just trying to show that the customer advisor may not have been doing it strictly for the purposes of ripping someone off :)

 

Never ascribe to conspiracy that which may be adequately explained by stupidity

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...