Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some questions, please: When you say nothing will happen, my 80 year-old mother is worried about potential DCA doorsteppers if/when the debts are sold on - she is a very sweet, quite vulnerable lady and she is worried she may be bullied and harrassed.  If they do come knocking, what should she say?  I told her to say she knows nothing about any of it and they have no right to come knocking on her door and to warn them police will be informed if they come back.  Problem is, I don't think she would be strong enough and can easily be bullied into saying more than she intended once the door has been answered. Next questions: 1)  Should I inform all my lenders that I have moved abroad before defaulting (to avoid the quirky English law loophole thingy that could end up in a CCJ or worse once a DCA gets hold of it)?  2)  Can/should I provide an alternative UK correspondence address to my lenders instead of my mother's home address e.g. my virtual office address for my business - would the lenders accept this as I live abroad now and don't live at my mother's address?  Can I just write and tell them, without any further ado and not get into any further questions about it and cease further correspondence with them and default?  And would this stop DCAs coming to my mother's house as it would not be my current residential address on the lenders files when passed to the DCA?  Do they doorstep previous addresses? 3)  If I don't provide a UK correspondence address will I be at risk of not being aware of any Letters of Claim etc and legal proceedings notices etc not reaching me (there's no reliable postal system in the developing country I've moved to).  Worried this would mean I could end up being taken to court without being aware of it and could end up in a worse situation. 2) What exactly will go on my credit file once I've defaulted, assuming no legal action is taken against me?    4) Should I contact any of my lenders and inform them I have zero assets.  TSB & Sainsburys already have I&E info from me which shows my income  @ £1200/mth is below the combined total of my debt repayments @ £1300/mth and that my income only just covers essential costs of living @ £1200/mth.  Could it be useful to be on my file that I have no assets, so that the DCA clearly see this when the debt is passed to them? Thanks again for any advice.
    • paypal, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there is a certain time limit they have to refund you? thanks
    • Dear lookinforinfo, I'm sorry if I seem stupid, but what exactly am I telling them? -what code/ law / standard have they broken that I will use as an argument in letter? I don't understand the premise of your argument.  I would appreciate it if you could explain it to me clearly and in simple terms so that I understand.  Thank you   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming on a Business account? Lets join forces?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The FOS are truly making decisions bordering on total incompetance and although they are effective in some matters the whole CCA 1974 issues appear to have them in circles. I can't see this changing anytime soon so perhaps go through the motions with the FOS instead using the time productively to plan any litigation necessary in the near future.

 

Frustrating but the banks do appear immune to trifling irritations like the english legal system so what choice does anyone have when supposed regulatory bodies won't act? Best of luck with it all and keep us all posted ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS are truly making decisions bordering on total incompetance and although they are effective in some matters the whole CCA 1974 issues appear to have them in circles. I can't see this changing anytime soon so perhaps go through the motions with the FOS instead using the time productively to plan any litigation necessary in the near future.

 

Frustrating but the banks do appear immune to trifling irritations like the english legal system so what choice does anyone have when supposed regulatory bodies won't act? Best of luck with it all and keep us all posted ;)

 

Don't waste your time with FOS. IMO there will be a read across to business accounts off the back of the OFT test case. In particular small business and sole trading accounts. Sit on your hands until next Wednesday and have a look at the situation then.

'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.'

Thomas Jefferson 1802

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the very same position with barclays. After the first letter was told no way and so I complained to FOS who wrote back saying they have reviewed my case and could not uphold my compaint as the charges were not penalties!!! The charges were for DD that were not paid.

 

Can anyone help with a reply to FOS? :-x

 

OK FOS They are not penalties.....so what are they?

 

Fair charges for the service provided ?

 

A reasonable fee reflecting the amount of work involved in "not paying" a DD...how much was I charged for not taking £10 out of the cash point when there were no funds avaliable?

Oh yeh £0!!

 

May be they are elephants?

'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.'

Thomas Jefferson 1802

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS are truly making decisions bordering on total incompetance and although they are effective in some matters the whole CCA 1974 issues appear to have them in circles. I can't see this changing anytime soon so perhaps go through the motions with the FOS instead using the time productively to plan any litigation necessary in the near future.

 

Frustrating but the banks do appear immune to trifling irritations like the english legal system so what choice does anyone have when supposed regulatory bodies won't act? Best of luck with it all and keep us all posted ;)

 

Section 78 used to state if a section 77 request of the CCA1974 isn't complied with after 30 day then the lender has committed an offence, but the "offence" bit has been removed which is why lenders hang thing out now. The OFT won't enforce the CCA, trading standards won't and the FOS take months. We have laws but no one to enforce them. How did we get to this situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sory to correct you Ibsys but s77(4) used to say this about a request under s77(1) and s78(6) about one made under s78(1). S77 refers to fixed loans and s78 to credit cards, catalogues, etc

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

(4) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

(b) has been struck out/repealed but is this part of 77 and not 78? Either way the lender cannot enforce the agrement if he does not comply with the 77/78 request.

 

Unfortunately, lenders drag their heals in complying to the request as the offence has been removed because they know what is going on. My real question is who enforces the CCA 1974?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the very same position with barclays. After the first letter was told no way and so I complained to FOS who wrote back saying they have reviewed my case and could not uphold my compaint as the charges were not penalties!!! The charges were for DD that were not paid.

 

Can anyone help with a reply to FOS? :-x

 

I set up a thread into "how good a job are the various publicly funded regulatory bodies doing? ". I totally agree FOS are useless. Can you subscribe to my thrread with yuour experiences?

 

Thanks

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not retrospectively they haven't

 

I have a problem with Lloyds and am trying to find out who enforces the CCA1974 as they have been issued with a 77/78 on May 19 by recorded delivery and signed for. I have complained to the OFT but they don't want to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ibsys,

 

The OFT would not be able to help with an individual complaint.

 

But see here for a suggestion about getting the FOS to intervene - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclaycard/231901-tony3x-barclaycard.html

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ibsys,

 

The OFT would not be able to help with an individual complaint.

 

But see here for a suggestion about getting the FOS to intervene - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclaycard/231901-tony3x-barclaycard.html

 

:)

 

Ther only problem with the FOS is they take about 6 months to even look at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

I'm new to this forum, I found this thread while looking for more information about claiming business bank charges. I have just been hit with nearly £300 charges for going overdrawn by £50, unfortunately in several tiny transactions. The account is with Abbey Business and I'm sole director of a limited company. I phoned Abbey today and was told that the best they could do as a good will gesture is to waive 2 x £30 fees. I am not very happy with such outcome, I would prefer all or most of the fees waived but obviously it won't happen over the phone.

 

Can you please advise me how to proceed next? I would like to write to them and reclaim the charges but I can't find an appropriate template to use. I would probably prefer to word the first letter differently and ask for the fees to be refunded as a good will gesture considering I've only had the account for a few months and haven't been overdrawn before. Would anyone please share their experience and recommend what to do as I'm getting a bit lost with all the complex cases on the forum :)

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi xukc15

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Are there other charges from before or is this it?

 

There isnt a template because there is aproblem with reclaiming business charges as they are not covered by consumer legislation and the judge in the test case said that they are not penalties. We are working on a different approach but it may not be worth it for just £300.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there other charges from before or is this it?

 

There isnt a template because there is aproblem with reclaiming business charges as they are not covered by consumer legislation and the judge in the test case said that they are not penalties. We are working on a different approach but it may not be worth it for just £300.

 

The business is quite new, so is the account, no other fees from before. I've been reading both this forum and the Money Saving expert site and while most cases relate to much larger sums of money, there's been comments by others in a similar situation like mine. Some say they've managed to claim the fees but haven't explained in detail what they've put in their letters or how they went about it.

Is there an approach you could recommend or do you think it’s unlikely to get these charges back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I am new to this site and have just received a copy of my husbands business bank account charges since 2003. The amount is £2247.21 he was a landscape gardener and had to take a job last year due to the credit crunch!! He has had to set up a loan to pay back his overdraft which had amounted to approx £6000.00.

Can somebody point me in the right direction for a template letter as I understand the business account reclaims are worded slightly different due to a different law??

Many Thanks

Gill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.Which bank is it ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks.

I suggest that first of all you spend some time reading up on this forum.

You will need to get an understanding of whats been happening in the last 12 months.

Claims for business charges differed from those of personal consumer accounts in that they were reliant soley on Common law statutes..as part of the arguement.

In late 2008,in the case brought by the OFT,the Judge ruled that charges were not penalties under common law.

We advise that claimants look at those terms and conditions that the banks submitted to the commercial court and reconcile them to their own.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...