Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 937
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks for the suggestion but Ive had this number for some 10years or more i refuse to have to change because of pond life like 1st Crudite.

 

Heres a thought, I was just about to send my cheque with my CCA and if i sign the cheque theyll have the signature that wouldve been on the original credit agreement! I dont trust them not to falsify a new agreement. How else can i make payment along with the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT are watching the crudités VERY closely it seem they just told me they will take into account the further information I have helpfully given the as they continue to monitor this “trader’s fitness to hold a credit licence.”

I have as you will be aware been asking for my CCA to be honoured for over a year and all they gave me was harassment and a badly scanned page of something, which you guys said is no use to them as a "properly executed copy "of an alleged agreement wqas essential. They also tried to get my signature but I just sent them the letter about this not being applicable etc. More threats came as expected. I have now told the crudites I want to complain to them again about their non complience in this matter.

His anyone got a sample of a legally-based written complaint to make them winch please for this one?

I feel that they are getting on thinner ice so I don’t want to blow it at this vital stage now.

The main thing I want to complain about is the ongoing abuse and their inability to give me a copy of any alleged agreement.

Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

another great piece of 1st Credit admin.. i got a letter this week to my curremt home saying 'this address has been given to them as a possible address of some they wish to speak to' ??? Theyve had my address for ages, i gave it them when i moved! now theyve written to my old address for some reason, i actually know the people who live at my old address so im not happy 1st Credit contacted them when they already had my current address and had written to me there.

I rang them up last night and they werent sure why they'd sent the letter there since they confirmed they already had my current address. Then on top of that.. he said he can see i agreed a payment plan of £58 per month when they last spoke to me.. (see my earlier post about me refusing to speak to them on the phone during working hours and how they claim i was "refusing to co-operate) seems after he hung up he fabricated a payment agreement which i knew nothing about (which i assume is so they can claim i defaulted on it later)..

 

Ill just add it all to my records for the OFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT are watching the crudités VERY closely it seem they just told me they will take into account the further information I have helpfully given the as they continue to monitor this “trader’s fitness to hold a credit licence.”

I have as you will be aware been asking for my CCA to be honoured for over a year and all they gave me was harassment and a badly scanned page of something, which you guys said is no use to them as a "properly executed copy "of an alleged agreement wqas essential. They also tried to get my signature but I just sent them the letter about this not being applicable etc. More threats came as expected. I have now told the crudites I want to complain to them again about their non complience in this matter.

His anyone got a sample of a legally-based written complaint to make them winch please for this one?

I feel that they are getting on thinner ice so I don’t want to blow it at this vital stage now.

The main thing I want to complain about is the ongoing abuse and their inability to give me a copy of any alleged agreement.

Help!

 

Hi i'm sorry i havn't got time to re read the whole thread

 

have they issued a DN?

 

if not im in the same position with one or two of mine (totally illegible copies of application forms 9and without any terms)

 

i am just sitting tight and ignoring them totally- i am waiting for them to issue what will be a defective DN and then terminating

 

if they have already issued DN and terminated your laughing- they cannot issue DN whilst they are in default of the CCA sect 78!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"have they issued a DN?"

 

 

What is DN?

 

"once they have terminated "

 

Can you clarify that too please?

 

My complaint is about them not honoring the CCA for so long and hassassing me with legal threats.

 

This is something they cannot change now.

 

I will hang on tho until you get back on those 2 points.

 

 

 

PS

 

"so my advice- say nothing"

 

 

Do you mean I should not complain to 1st crud as planned via their procudure polity - until what ...?

 

 

Soz - a bit confused here now.

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, if you dont maintain payments they will eventually issue a DN = DEFAULT NOTICE

 

stating that unless you pay the arrears by such and such a dazte they will then terminate the agreement

 

these DN's are often defective in themselves.

 

they cannot issue a DN if they are in Default- many people believe them to be in default when they have responded to CCA sect 77/79 requests with information which is not quite what they wanted ( a copy of the original credit agreement) but quite often the creditor HAS done enough and this is a grey area

 

 

in your case (and mine) where either NOTHING has been provided or alternatively a copy which is not "easily legible" then they are in default of the CCA until such time as they produce this information in an easily legible form.

 

Now, if they issue a DN (which as i said before often may be defective in itself) it will be an invalid DN in your case because they are not allowed to do so whilst in default.

 

after the expiry of the time limit in the DN (depending on the wording which you can post up on here) the Account can be taken as terminated if the DN states it WILL be or alternatively it can say in the DN that it MSAY be terminated

 

to be 100% sure you keep quiet and let them (or their solicitors) confirm in writing to you that the account is terminated and that they are claiming the full balance or selling it on or whatever (the original creditor writing and claiming the full balance can be taken as confirmation that the account is terminated)

 

at that point you can break out the bubbly, once the account is terminated there is no turning back, the fact that they did it on the back of a defective DN is beside the point

 

at this stage the ONLY debt you will have to them is the amount of arrears that they were claiming on the DN at the time of termination

 

however, if you were to alert them to the fact that the DN was invalid it may spur them to check it our, realise their mistake and withdraw and / or re issue it which is NOT what you want.

 

If you have made the request- put them on notice that they are in default then there is absolutely nothing they can do to enforce all the time they fail to comply with your sect 77/79 request so my advice (i am not legally qualified) is to keep quiet!

 

if they send you some documents in response to your request and claim that they have complied THEN get these posted up for an opinion because there is a huge grey area between what people WANT them to provide and what they can get away with providing in order toi claim they have complied

 

 

hope that all makes sense!

 

i am sure someone more experienced will correct me if i have got that wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - many thanks.

 

No - I have no DN, just lots of threats to pay up or else.

 

They have also sent me there complaints procudure policy and I was about to send back with the complaint about them having not complied with my CCA requests for over 12 months. They just sent the bad scan of some single page.

 

So I now just wait - yes?

 

What happens next?

 

Should I not still just complain officially via their complaints procedure that no CCA has been honoured by them as they fully know already?

 

Just thinking that if I ignore that they will say I never complained properly to them!

 

 

 

"at this stage the ONLY debt you will have to them is the amount of arrears that they were claiming on the DN at the time of termination"

 

That sounds iffy. Why should I owe then aything if they cannot prove a debt, via not producing any proper copy agreement?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - re-reading your data

 

I do not complain now - I just wait for a DN which will be invalid?

 

Then?

 

Sorry - you have to spoon feed me .

 

Surely they know that a DN will be worthless as I have been shouting back for a proper CCA for ages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh if only they had enough brain cells

 

you can fire off another complaint if you like (recorded deliverfy) but it really is not for you to KEEP reminding them

 

i think three times is more than enough times to prove you have done enough

 

just end the last letter by saying that they remain in default until the comply with your sect 78 request and all correspondence will be ignored until such time as they comply

 

end of

 

sit back and relax

 

use the search button above and read a few threads about defective DN's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DD - appriciated

 

I have probably reminded them about non complience about 5 - 6 times.

 

I shall act accordingly with the brief complaint and then wait it out.

 

ACCOUNT IN SERIOUS DISPUTE!

 

Just one more point that came to mind re a complaintThey happily send confidential materials re alleged debts to folks and then ask for the signature 'later'. Is this not a BREACH OF DATA PROTECTION ACT ?

Edited by questioner
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never posted before and don't know how to do it. Sorry!

I had a debt with Aqua which was sold on to 1st Credit. They accepted a payment in full and final settlement in March 2008 but now I have just received a letter from Clarity (on behalf of Aqua) demanding for the remainder!

 

Can anyone tell me how to proceed please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...