Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC parking invoice - tesco Faraday retail park,Coatbank Street, Coatbridge. ML5 3SQ scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You misunderstand - it is not just 0800 numbers, but ANY 'Special Services' number which includes all the variants 0800, 0845, 0870, 0500, 0808. It's all to do with the 'quirks' of the call set up process. The 'bigger' the customer, the need for a digital connection to the network - especially if they have multiple incoming lines (like ISDN 30). The number information is sent as part of the C7 signalling data as part of the call set up process. The data is directly viewable irrespective whether 141 is dialled beforehand, this simply sends a 'do not display' flag, which is ignored when wholesale calls are delivered.

 

So calls to Sky from lines that withhold their number are never a problem. They know who you are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You misunderstand - it is not just 0800 numbers, but ANY 'Special Services' number which includes all the variants 0800, 0845, 0870, 0500, 0808. It's all to do with the 'quirks' of the call set up process. The 'bigger' the customer, the need for a digital connection to the network - especially if they have multiple incoming lines (like ISDN 30). The number information is sent as part of the C7 signalling data as part of the call set up process. The data is directly viewable irrespective whether 141 is dialled beforehand, this simply sends a 'do not display' flag, which is ignored when wholesale calls are delivered.

 

So calls to Sky from lines that withhold their number are never a problem. They know who you are.

Thats very interesting Buzby, thank you. It has answered a question that has been bugging me for ages.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the 'callback'? They 'accepted' mine quite happily for 10 years until they tried to charge me 'Invoice Fees'. It was me that terminated.

 

It is not commonly known that large users with digital connections get the full call data field. I would imagine that there would be some guideline somewhere that states they cannot make use of this data, but I believe the only reason they make any reference to 'no number withheld' calls is because if they didn't, people would start asking why they DIDN'T make an issue of it.

 

For further info, all phone lines have a capability to show TWO numbers, CLI the calling line identity, and CLIP the same, but a special 'presentation' number. For most domestic and small business lines, the CLI/CLIP data is identical. However businesses and certain other users show the number the WANT shown (perhaps an 0800 or 0870) or a dynamic one that shows the direct extension number of the person calling, even though this isn't the actual number of the line making the call.

 

With a C7 connection you can view both numbers, and for about 4 weeks the SkypeIn service was configured (wrongly!) to show the CLI number of the incoming call. This provided the actual line number - not the 0870 or other number the caller expected.

 

It was a shame they fixed it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello can someone please help,

i'm new to this site,this is my first post, i've been getting threatening letters from ukpc for a while now, i have been closely monitoring this site and it has been an excellent help/lift,so i have been replying basically saying send me proof that i was the driver and what funds are they claiming for when it was a free b&q car park, it has got to the point where they referred it to the debt collecting ageny, i referred them back to UKPC, now i have received a letter from "COLEMANS-CTTS SOLICITORS" of manchester,basically saying i have 7 days to pay up orthey are going to serve proceedings against me without further notice to myself as well as court charges and interest of 8%, I'M NOT GOING TO PAY THESE PARASITES, BUT IT IS STARTING TO SOUNG A BIT LEGAL TO ME,I'M PREPARED TO GO TO COURT, BUT IT HAS COME TO THAT TIME THAT I NEED SOME RE-ASSURANCE.

 

TA...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Homebrew1971,

 

The first mistake you have made is contacting them - this must now cease immediately. Secondly, there are solicitors company's out there that buy massive portfolio's of debt - they then send out x number of letters and if just a small percentage pay then it has been successful. A solicitors letter adds no strength to their claim and it is virtually standard practice. You can do the math yourself - if a solicitor costs £150 per hour then how much time are they going to spend pursuing a parking fine. The answer is very little. It's a clever model because at each stage of the process the threat increases and more people pay. Those who don't pay are written off.

 

Occassionally, you will here a PPC is taking someone to court - this is nothing more than a demonstration of their potential to carry out the threat. It is not a sustainable business model for them.

 

So, in short stop communicating with them, ignore their letters and relax. The good news is that you are almost at the end of the process :) Chin up, if you need any more help then jump straight back on.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

agreed. Solicitor letter 'probably' worded correctly but may not be so always worth a look as the SRA beckons for naughty ones. I should point out that for these disputed PPC 'debts' that unless the original creditor ( assignor ) has given you a notice of assignment (Law of Property Act 1925 S.136) - then any debt sold to one of these collectors is not enforceable until the assignor does so. of course when its the usual phoney DCA this won't apply but for PPCs that use real DCAs it does. have a look here Debt collection: Recovering the debt through third parties. ever seen sold on 'debts' from PPCs that actually follow this ? No, of course not. a sure sign the DCA also knows its a [problem].

Edited by lamma
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a new twist for me.. anyone heard of or had any correspondence from ScotCall? I can't find a link to Rossendales, I assume they are just the latest bunch of chancers peddling the "Our field representatives will be making a doorstep call" routine. Do they think we are stupid? I look forward to a very short chat if the mythical Field Rep turns up :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all again,

basically the letter says

they have been instructed by thier client to apply for my payment of £199.25 ( was £45 at the start) in relation to my outstanding account.

 

they go on to say they are unaware as to why this sum has not been paid,even though i have written to them to send me the proof of the contract that i have with them,and for the proof of who the driver was,

 

then accordingly,thier instructions are clear that unless they recieve my remittance within 7 days then they are therafter to issue and serve proceedings upon myself without further notice to me.

 

it all sounds SCARY!!!

 

what can anyone recommend, do i write to this solicitor company to state i have asked for information but they are unwilling to send it to me, or do nothing at all. ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

You LET THEM take you to court (if they dare). You can then tell the judge of the ongoing harassment for an invoice you neither agreed to or sanctioned. Your letters were ignored (nothing new there).

 

Just open, read and file their correspondence. They'll stop when they're sure you'll not buckle. The ONLY letter to respond to is one from the court itself, but the chances of that happening would be like winning the lottery...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all again,

basically the letter says

they have been instructed by thier client to apply for my payment of £199.25 ( was £45 at the start) in relation to my outstanding account.

 

Well they have applied for it so they have followed their clients instructions, doesn't mean they are getting paid though:)

 

they go on to say they are unaware as to why this sum has not been paid,

 

You would think alleged 'solicitors' would know a [problem] when they see one, unless of course they are involved:eek:

 

then accordingly,thier instructions are clear that unless they recieve my remittance within 7 days then they are therafter to issue and serve proceedings upon myself without further notice to me.

 

Yeah right:lol::lol::lol:

 

it all sounds SCARY!!!

 

what can anyone recommend, do i write to this solicitor company to state i have asked for information but they are unwilling to send it to me, or do nothing at all. ??

 

Ignore these muppets

 

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you haven't been waiting in special for them. ;)

 

its been a little while, I hope you all been well and in good health.

Guys I was a bit confused by reading the above quote, do the Debt recovery come to your house to visit you,,,, Do they not have to take you to court before they can do this,,,,,is this something to be worried about.

I've just had my first letter from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd (Recovery Investigation & Bailiff Services),,, RED bold headlines and etc

it gives me the usual threats

if you don't pay within 7 days then

* A county court judgement being issued against you

* An Attachment of earnings order

* Your personal erects being sold to pay the amount at judgement

Any court judgement last for 6 years and will survey affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

is this correct ,,,,can they do this affect your credit rating,,,

I'm not planning to pay ,,,,I am just concerned that they may send a big ugly man to house and start to harass me or my family while I'm around.

should I be worried ,,,,,don't all these thing happen after court proceedings,

Anyone please advise 8),,,and thank you for any advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Not been around for quite sometime. It's been over a year I think since I got the junk mail on the windscreen.

 

Just a quick update.. The debt collection company was changed for mine, but they are being very persistant. Company now "ScottCall".. but the letters etc are all the same format, which I presume was probably due to some other swindle, like some tax evasion or something they are doing behind closed doors.

 

On the debt collecting front... I've burnt out the kettle waiting for the "debt collector" to come around. Every month he's coming "immediately", or in SEVEN DAYS.

 

I still get letters about once a month, latest one says that I should pay or they will give it back to their client in SEVEN DAYS.. Not sure what the threat actually is in that :)

 

So, apart from tons of threatening letters saying the same thing about the famous SEVEN DAYS until doom, i'm kinda bored with them now.

 

I wonder if I'll get more exciting stuff from "the client" aka UKPC, aka the debt collector's brother/nephew, or whatever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been a little while, I hope you all been well and in good health.

 

Guys I was a bit confused by reading the above quote, do the Debt recovery come to your house to visit you,,,, Do they not have to take you to court before they can do this,,,,,is this something to be worried about.

 

I've just had my first letter from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd (Recovery Investigation & Bailiff Services),,, RED bold headlines and etc

 

it gives me the usual threats

 

if you don't pay within 7 days then

 

* A county court judgement being issued against you

* An Attachment of earnings order

* Your personal erects being sold to pay the amount at judgement

 

Any court judgement last for 6 years and will survey affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

is this correct ,,,,can they do this affect your credit rating,,,

 

I'm not planning to pay ,,,,I am just concerned that they may send a big ugly man to house and start to harass me or my family while I'm around.

 

should I be worried ,,,,,don't all these thing happen after court proceedings,

 

 

Anyone please advise 8),,,and thank you for any advise

 

Hi. Its nonsense. It has to go to court (it wont), then a judge has to decide in the PPCs favour. If successful then the CCJ etc comes into play. Baliffs only become involved if you are judged against and then only after you cannot/do not pay.

Edited by DDWales
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys I was a bit confused by reading the above quote, do the Debt recovery come to your house to visit you,,,, Do they not have to take you to court before they can do this,,,,,is this something to be worried about.

 

NO

 

I've just had my first letter from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd (Recovery Investigation & Bailiff Services),,, RED bold headlines and etc

 

:lol::lol::lol: What a bunch of muppets

 

it gives me the usual threats

 

if you don't pay within 7 days then

 

Your personal erects being sold to pay the amount at judgement

 

According to my wife they wouldn't get much for mine!!!!!

 

Any court judgement last for 6 years and will survey affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

is this correct ,,,,can they do this affect your credit rating,,,

 

NO

 

I'm not planning to pay ,,,,I am just concerned that they may send a big ugly man to house and start to harass me or my family while I'm around.

 

should I be worried

NO

 

 

Anyone please advise 8),,,and thank you for any advise

 

Do what most of us do, just have a laugh at their expense.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...