Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mer Vs lloydstsb


merdoom
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused: Hello all,

 

I am planning to file against lloyds with mcol tomorrow, and just want to do a final check that i am doing everything right.(have sent prelim letter, rec final response from ltsb, sent lba, rec no reply.)

 

As i sent my prelim letter in october last year, some of the charges now fall outside the 6 year period, ie: the first charge is from october 2000.

 

I have seen on the web that the only people who are having serious problems are people trying to claim outside six years, and if there is any chance that this will upset my claim or cause problems, i would rather not try to claim for those amounts.

 

many thanks in advance! and good luck all........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The 6 years you can claim starts from when you started the claim, ie when you sent the SAR, or the Prelim letter if you didn't do a SAR, so the charges you are claiming for are fine.

Good luck, and keep us informed on how you are doing.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!,

just wanted to make sure i am doing everything to the letter, the advice here is so good. i really hope i win so i can give something back to help!!

 

Cheers and good luck all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again all!

 

I just recieved a letter from lloyds with the standard offer of £750 as a goodwill gesture, as £625 was paid into my account and they have removed an upcomming charge of £125 (which i have not put on my claim) should i now file with mcol my original charges -£625 or -£750?

 

Also do i need to send the letter rejecting this offer of payment as it is not offered as settlement, but as goodwill? (see section of letter below)

 

" generally we don't agree to adjust any of theese charges, but i can tell you on this occasion we are prepared to reduce the charges by repaying you £625.00. in addition i have agreed to waive the charges totalling £125 still due to be debited from your account.you may have read that we and the other banks are discussing overdraft charges with the oft. meanwhile we do consider each customers position individually, and we are making you this offer as a gesture of goodwill because we might face that cost in dealing with your complaint if you took it any further.

i need to let you know that this does not mean we consider we have any legal obligation to do so. £625 will be credited to your account in the next few days."

 

 

Many thanks in advance!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would claim for your original amount less £625.

I would send the letter, I think there is a few to choose from here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejection-settlement-offer.html

 

Hope that helps.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure i must be doing something wrong here as mcol will not let me file this,i get an error. have counted lines and chars and is within the amounts specified, think my brain may be getting tired! can someone else have alook and tell me if it is looking ok or any advice on better wording, i changed it a little because of the goodwill payment, don't want to get anything wrong and am looking forward to giving something back to this wonderful site, (its all i talk about at the moment!) cheers! (the question marksin account number are mine!)

 

1. The Claimant has an account ????????

with the Defendant, opened 1994. Since

22/12/00 the Defendant debited charges and

interest in respect of purported breaches

of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all

details as a list of charges has already

been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges

exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the

breaches; (b) The Term permitting the

Defendant to levy such charges is

unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair

Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law.

5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the

amounts debited of £1974.00 minus 625.00

goodwill gesture £1349.00; (b) Interest per

S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% -

£222.92 continuing at 8% until judgment or

settlement at a daily rate of £0.43; 6.

Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for

a service, then they must be reasonable

under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and

Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the

Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, so i was being a little, well dim! thought it was 1080 OR 24 lines, seems i have 25 lines and no matter how i try and delete spaces here and there i still end up with 25 or even 26 lines! anyone willing to have a look and try and fit it into 24 for me?

good luck to everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

claim updated to: 26/02/07Acknowledged

The Defendant is allowed a total of 28 days from the date from when they are served with the claim to reply.

 

so just wait for them to file a defence now i suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just re read my claim and realized i didn't put the intrest in the total claim amount, i have it in the particulars of the claim but the total amount is just the charges. should i try and amend it with mcol or can i just carry on and not claim the interest?????

 

OOPs, and i have been really careful ( or so i thought)

 

Any help would be great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends if you think the interest is worth the cost of £35 to amend the claim? If you haven't included it on the claim form, Lloyds are not likely to pay it.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am more worried it will delay everything, or cause problems as i put it within the claim details, its also on the schedules i have sent out to the court and lloyds! think i might as well amend with mcol, its an extra £220, i could do with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hello!

 

recieved lloyds defenceand aq, looks pretty standard apart from i have an extra point (making it 10 points in total)

 

9: (further insofaras part of the claimants claim is based on charges levied on her account prior to six years from the date of the claim, that is 20th feb 2001, this part of the claim is statue barred by section 5 of the limitation act 1980. the defendant is is unable to verify the amount claimed prior to the 20th feb 2001 as the particulars of claim does not show how the amount claimed is arrived at.)

 

i sent my first letter requesting repayment in october last year and the schedule of charges i have sent to them(3 times) includes the first charge from 20th dec 2000, should i reply to this or any advice as to what now??

 

Many thanks everyone!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to clarify, should i put something in section g of the aq to explain that i started procedings to reclaim this amount prior to the date of the court claim and that is why it goes back further than 6 years?

 

thanks again guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to ask again (want to get the aq off asap),

but i don't want to get anything else wrong!!

will include a schedule of charges when i send a copy of the aq to sc+m which shows the charge for dec 01 and jan 01, but still not sure if i should make reference to this on the aq itself.

 

thanks again everyone!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

another quick question, when i have finished the aq and have to send a copy to sc&m can i fax it? does nayone have a fax number for them? would this be a bad idea??

as my claim is under £1,500 hoping they will just settle quite quickly. guessing it will go down to the last day at court though!!

 

once again (and not for the last time i am sure)

Thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If It was me, I wouldnt' mention anything on the AQ about the 6 year thing, but it's up to you.

Fax number is 01273 745356, save you the price of a stamp!

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Barty, i didnt mention the 6 years as there is only one charge that falls outside, have faxed and posted aq and new draft, hopefully they wont want the judge to have the chance to approve the draft and will pay up! i won't hold my breath though, sure they will take it to the court date.

 

cheers guys, and good luck everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

helo everyone!

i looked in my bank today to see if this bacs mess up had paid my wages , which it hadn't.

But low and behold there was £1,300 paid in yesterday!

I WON!!(i hope)

no letter from lloyds yet but i suppose that must be in the post, it says bank charge refund nextdoor to the money, so it will be my first meal out tonight for ages!!

I just want to thank everyone for the help i have had here, this will really get me back on track so i can pay off some other wolves at the door.

 

faxing the aq really seemed to work, i only sent it last friday!!

 

will donate as soon as i get everything in order and work out how much i have thats spendable!!

 

once again thanks guys and good luck to everyone else!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many congratulations - bet your weekend has got much better now :)

 

Enjoy it.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dolly! because of the bacs mess up i wasn't going to be able to pay some bills, but now its all ok.

 

now to buy myself a little treat!

 

Good luck everyone, you do get there in the end!!

 

(can someone change title to won for me?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...