Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OldBear versus Natwest ****won****


OldBear
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, here goes.

 

To be honest, I've actually been a good little boy with my NatWest account the last 3 years, but between 2001 and the end of 2003 I know the Natwest fat cats made a tidy amount from me after I hit a bad patch.

 

So, it's now time to get back that money methinks; it may not run into the thousands, but as you guys keep telling everyone here... it's mine and I want it back.

 

I've got the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) all ready to go today. I just need a couple of things confirmed:

 

1. Do I send it to here?

 

Mr. Alex Lyons

Data Protection Manager

Retail Regulatory Risk

2nd Floor

Business House B

Gogarburn

P. O. Box 1000

Edinburgh

EH12 1HQ

 

or is there another name or address it should go to? I read the contacts and noticed 2 or 3 addresses, so which is best.

 

2. I'll be paying for the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) with a postal order; to whom do I make it out to?

 

3. I'm aware of the 6 year limit on claims and don't want to unnecessarily drag my case out by fighting further back than 6 years, but can I make my claim from today, since it is today that I am making them aware of their 'wrongdoings', or can I only claim form the date of the first "I want my money back" letter?

 

Thanks in advance for all the help you are going to be giving me. ;)

 

Bear

 

btw. Mods, feel free to edit anything out that I shouldn't be posting.

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Nattie; SAR goes out as soon as my labels get here. :)

 

Not sure what you mean by the last bit. :confused: I thought one could only claim for a max of 6 years. Aren't I just going to cause problems for myself if I take it back past 6 years?

 

Bear

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear, I have not heard of anybody winning a claim further than 6 years, so I would keep your claim to the previous 6 years which would cover your 'naughty' period.

You can date your claim from the day you actually claim.

Hope this helps. I'm at the court stage - see my thread Mupster v Natwest.

  • Confused 1
;) Mupster
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, Nattie. :)

 

Thanks to you too, Mupster. I'll just claim for the 6 years then. ;)

 

Good luck with your case; it looks like you're pretty close, so I'll be watching to see how you do.

 

Bear

 

btw. Here's a point I would like clarification on if anyone knows. In 2003 NatWest 'made' me take a loan out with them to clear my overdraft (all charges). Since the charges were illegal, could I claim back the interest on the loan since I should never have had to take it out with them in the first place?

 

Interest was only a few quid (maybe 40- 50 quid) because it was a small loan (few hundred), but I'd be interested to know what you guys think.

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the loan thing, I keep out of those things, because there are occasions when people's memories seem to change in certain circumstances with a new benefit of hindsight. But if the route you are taking is the Loan Gizmo, a site helper is the best person to advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, Nattie.

 

there are occasions when people's memories seem to change in certain circumstances with a new benefit of hindsight.

Not quite sure what you mean by that. :confused:

 

I should have pointed out that my question is/was purely hypothetical. My claim will be purely for 'physical', easy to prove, unfair charges. I doubt there is any way one could win a case based on the 'evidence' I suggested above. So if that's what you meant, then I do know what you mean. :)

 

You have piqued my curiosity though with the phrase "Loan Gizmo"; anyone care to enlighten me further.

 

Bear

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

what I meant is that there is genuine misselling of ppi, and there is ppi claims which IMHO are not, where the ability to claim changes the memory of an individual. It varies from case to case and there are cases that I have read was not misselling but simply knowing no better and then choosing to claim it back. That has consequences, staff losing their jobs is the ultimate sanction which is why I cannot get involved. To help get someone the sack for me is reprehensible to me personally as a member or staff. As I said, charges on personal accounts are one thing and that bit I can help with, loans as a result of charges I have no problem with but the rest is not which is just my own opinion.

In relation to Loan Gizmo. Gizmo is a Site Helper who has claimed on the loan- sorry for the misunderstanding on that last bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nattie,

 

That clears things up nicely. I understand what you mean now, although I wasn't actually referring to PPI at all. I was talking about the bank 'advising' me to take out a loan (with them) to payback an overdraft consisting totally of charges.

 

That said, I still wouldn't try claiming it back as I always had the choice; I could have said, "no, I'll pay it off some other way".

 

I totally agree with you about staff losing jobs through clients mistakes; that's not on at all.

 

As for my claim, I finally got my SAR ready for sending and it will be going out today.

 

Thanks again for your continuing help and advice.

 

Bear

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chaps/chapettes. :D

 

Got my statements back in less than a week.

 

Looks like we're off! Well... nearly. I've got a couple of simple Q's before I start, though.

 

1. Only got statements, no written notification of any sort about whether any manual interventions had been made. Should I worry about that too much?

 

2. Have started checking through my statements; I'm intending to claim back the following:

 

a) Card Misuse Fees

b) Unarranged Borrowing Fees

c) Unpaid DD Charges

d) Paid Referral Fees

 

Anyone see any problem with that?

 

3. I've got a £10 Loan Arrangement Fee on here; can I claim that back? Loan was only for £350. I've had loans many times before from banks and never been charged an 'arrangement' fee. Any ideas? (Nattie?)

 

Thanks in advance. :)

 

OB

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) that should mean no manual intervention

2)fine

3) not sure check with gizmo111 on that one

As always, Nattie, many thanks. You really are a diamond. :)

 

I'm not going to bother with the arrangement fee. Things have been looking good for a few people this week and I'm not going to add anything that could hold up a possible early result.

 

That said, I now have my total, and it appears as if I wasn't quite as naughty as I thought I had been. :p

 

I'll be sending off my prelim letter tomorrow and am asking for the return of a mere £599. :-o If I have to go to court there will be an added £234 in 8% interest, plus fees, etc.

 

Wish me luck, guys. :D

 

OB

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of Luck OB, not that luck will come into it, you'll do just fine!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks deller, glad to know you're at my side. :)

 

I did make a minor cock-up; I didn't claim for any interest on the charges. I got the Contractual, S69 and 'actual interest charged on charges' mixed up. So, thinking I could only claim Interest at the Court stage, I claimed none of them. :grin:

 

Not to worry; if they settle for the £599 at the Prelim stage, I'll be chuffed. If not, I'll just add the S69 (£234 and climbing) at the Court stage. I'm not greedy.

 

Nattie, you're right again; Mrs Tudor's confirmation of no intervention arrived today.

 

I'll be back when Mr Higley sends his reply.

 

OB

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be back when Mr Higley sends his reply.

Which he has, and...

 

The ball's in the back of the net!!! We have another winner, folks.

 

Feeling kind of good right now. Got an offer of full settlement (after just my prelim) with the usual, "fair, reasonable, blah, blah, blah." I just have to send back my reply for a payment into my account.

 

I'll be donating my 5% (£29.95) as soon as it's in my account. I tell you, it's going to be the best money I've ever spent relating to bank business.

 

Super advice at a bargain price. Thanks to all at CAG.

 

OB

 

btw. I'd be grateful if a Mod could change the thread title for me.

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!!

cant wait till we have our thread changed to won...lol.

Have fun spending that money.:)

All the best Trish

If my advice has helped please click my scales

 

Should you require any further help feel free to pm me.

Nat West 2nd Acc

Prelim letter sent 8th Feb '07

:) Full Settlement Offer 24th Feb '07:)

:pMONEY BACK IN ACC ON MARCH THE FIRST '07:p

 

 

Nat West 1st Acc

Filed at court 2nd of Feb '07

Acknowledged on 15th of Feb '07

:rolleyes: Defence submitted 1st March 2007 :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all. :) I just hope all my other claims are this easy, although I doubt it.

 

Congratulations, and I hope you stick around to help the newer ones.

Thanks, Nattie. I will be sticking around. Not only because I have claims with other banks/companies, though. I'd like to be able to learn a bit more about the 'whole' claims procedure, so that in future I could help others. I'd also like to give back a bit more to CAG other than just a cash donation.

 

It really annoys me when I read some of the stories on here about how shabbily some people have been treated. We shouldn't have young people like Julie in tears asking for help because of her bank, (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/62982-grrrr-natwest.html), or old ladies of 79 getting mugged by her bank. (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/59695-please-help-old-lady.html)

 

I want to help stop this happening. I want to see that banks mend their ways.

 

So, yeah, I'm staying. :D

 

OB :)

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations OB, enjoy the dosh. :D

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Deller. I appreciate you taking time to pop by say hello.

 

My claim wasn't as big or as exciting as your long tale, but like so many others, it gave me the will to try for myself.

 

That's what makes this site so special; so many friends. :)

 

OB

Please read the Stickies and FAQs. Your question may have been answered already.

 

Old Bear vs. NatWest - won after first letter £600

Mrs Bear vs. Studio - won after first letter £360

Old Bear vs. Abbey - won after first letter - only £50, but it's the principle

Old Bear vs. Black Horse - £117 of charges wiped off 2 loans, but more WILL follow

Mrs Bear vs. Index (Littlewoods) - SAR sent - 2/2/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats!

 

I am now taking Natwest to the cleaners! I ahve £770 to claim. I see here this does not go to the branch butthe bishopsgate address. Wat is the full address and which department should this be addressed to?

 

Grateful for your assistance

 

Karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...