Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Brooksdad v Woolwich


hughes690
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 282
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Nothing new by post from either Woolwich or DCA. NI Court service (Small Claims Court) showing Return Date of 08 May 07 on Case Tracking page. Small Claims Packs (issued?) 27 Mar 07.

 

We're 'MOVING ON' - Yipeee! :)

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

right hughsey now your cooking on gas ! so woolwich have until may 8th to send in their defence ! you will probably find they send it in by the 1st of may via a local belfast solicitor which they use for all their business nothing to worry about as once defence is entered court date is issued then you will get settlement the same as the rest of us ! so roll on may !

if my advice has been of any help to you then please click the scales ! Thank you :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop torturing yourself lol ! try putting it out of your mind for a while i know its hard but try sueing some other bank in the mean time ha ha ha !

if my advice has been of any help to you then please click the scales ! Thank you :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Horray! --

 

Second letter arrived from Debt Collection Agency ECI

 

(who?),

 

the number 2 DCA (anyone know them?)

 

saying DCA number 1 (Equidebt) has asked ECI to pursue two debts (Woolwich) with vigour (WHY?)

 

(3 BT 1571 URGENT messages from ECI asking me to contact them within last week to discuss settlement)

 

I don't talk on phone.

 

Any advice? :(

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Horray! --

 

Second letter arrived from Debt Collection Agency ECI

 

(who?),

 

the number 2 DCA (anyone know them?)

 

saying DCA number 1 (Equidebt) has asked ECI to pursue two debts (Woolwich) with vigour (WHY?)

 

(3 BT 1571 URGENT messages from ECI asking me to contact them within last week to discuss settlement)

 

I don't talk on phone.

 

Any advice? :(

 

Sorry for not popping in earlier Hughesy but I am trying to get everything ready for an appointment with a judge on Monday.

 

DCA's do tend to pass these thigns around so just write to the new crowd and tell them that Equidebt have failed to respond to a sec 77/78 request under the CCA and that they have now committed a criminal offence. ANY attempt to enforce the alleged agreement also constitutes an offence so you advise them not to become involved.

 

BigAl seems to be advising you well :)

 

 

Same sh*t different company, follow the above, and in a few weeks you will probably get a different DCA contact you. It may seem a never ending circle but it will.:)

 

AL:D

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have prepared letter for posting to ECI (DCA No 2) - - - WHO are they or what?? (anyone heard of them?? (Surbiton, Surrey) - - - - as suggested.

 

:(

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have prepared letter for posting to ECI (DCA No 2) - - - WHO are they or what?? (anyone heard of them?? (Surbiton, Surrey) - - - - as suggested.

 

:(

 

No, ive not, i think there is a way you can find out who they are via companies house or a similar establisment, other than that im not sure:confused: .

 

AL;)

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just browsing various threads today and came across 'Is Your Bank Taking Your Benefits?' as unfair charges.

 

Beyond the 6-year claim-back limit, Woolwich (prior to my current action against them), for many years left me penniless (and my wife) in their taking my Incapacity Benefit and Income Support as penalty charges.

 

What action (in the absence, now, of any records or Statements) can I take to determine those charges prior to 12 December 2000 and request also those illegal charges be ALSO refunded?

 

Advice would be appreciated. :(

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just browsing various threads today and came across 'Is Your Bank Taking Your Benefits?' as unfair charges.

 

Beyond the 6-year claim-back limit, Woolwich (prior to my current action against them), for many years left me penniless (and my wife) in their taking my Incapacity Benefit and Income Support as penalty charges.

 

What action (in the absence, now, of any records or Statements) can I take to determine those charges prior to 12 December 2000 and request also those illegal charges be ALSO refunded?

 

Advice would be appreciated. :(

 

 

I think the only way is an estimated claim and to come up with an excellelent reason why the statute of limitations shouldnt apply :(

 

Unless of course this was a mortgage where a 12 year rule applies instead of 6 years.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE:- Nothing to report. Nothing from Woolwich. Nothing from DCA number One or Two. Phew!

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looked in Northern Ireland Courts Service on line tracking today (Small Claims) and Notice of Dispute has been filed by Barclays.

 

Any advice?

 

:(

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hughes

 

Sorry not sure about Notice of dispute, apart from you have obviously got up their nose. Seriously though im not sure on the NI CC system perhaps a PM to Paddy M or a MOD might work. :D

 

AL;)

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

02 May: New info at NI Court Service - 'Transfer (Civil) Case'

Anyone advise? :(

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got your PM

 

this is standard procedure-it just means that the inevitable has been put off for a few weeks by the Woolwich filing what is more than likely a spurous defence,with no actual intent to do so....

 

transfer to Civil case simply means that Chichester street has farmed it out to your nominated local court to fix a date for hearing.

 

There is absolutely no cause for panic-be prepared to go to court,but expect a cheque in the run up to your court date.

 

you know where I am if you need help.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looked in Northern Ireland Court (Small Claims) on-line and, behold, a Hearing date:-

Tuesday, 12 June, 2007, at 10-30 am.

 

Any further advice?? :mad:

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hughes

I would suggest a letter or phone call to Barclays at their litigation dept, asking that in the interest of the Overiding Objective could this claim be settled without the need for court action. Do it about three weeks before the court date. Im sure they will settle.

 

AL:)

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for further advice al. Will certainly try letter or phone call nearer to hearing date. Any templates anywhere? Ta again. :)

.

NEW CLAIMANTS PLEASE FIRST READ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND FORUM RULES

 

Link:

FAQ

 

ANY ADVICE OFFERED IS A PERSONAL OPINION AND IS GIVEN AS SUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope no templates just state your name, court claim number, account number. and that in the interest of the overiding objective and saving the courts time could this be settled before court (Although i would ring).

 

AL:D

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...