Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Whatawoman v HSBC *******WON*******


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 298
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the biggest problem now is the strain on the court system. HSBC strategy now is to do absolutely nothing until they receive final deadline from the court.

 

My MCOL was transferred to Cardiff (my local court) with a allocation questionnaire deadline of 2nd April. Speaking to court officials it seems that the judge still hasn't made an order and won't do until next week and then there is a 10 day back log on typing up orders.....judges are therefore adding 2 weeks to their normal timescales to take account of this backlog.

 

I don't understand why the bank's defense is not being thrown out automatically when they don't make allocation deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh Andy, seems we are on the same path and timescale so keep me updated how you do.

 

I agree the defense should just be struck out when they don't submit an AQ - I guess my local court is under the same strain then as I am waiting for the Judge to make an order too, I expected that to be within a day or two of the deadline passing :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, whatawoman, AQ due 1st April. Have sent nudge letter, have rang DG - heard nothing. Rang Court, was told same as you. Still waiting.

  • Preliminary letter sent 15/01/2007 received 16/01/2007 :cool:
  • LBA sent 29/01/2007 received 30/01/2007 8-)
  • Mcol filed on 12/02/2007 8-) acknowledged 14/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope so I am not a patient person, and it feels like this has gone on forever. I have had no response from DG at all, which is frustrating, no contact from HSBC, no offers, nothing from the beginning. Hopefully though as you say we might hear something this week.

  • Preliminary letter sent 15/01/2007 received 16/01/2007 :cool:
  • LBA sent 29/01/2007 received 30/01/2007 8-)
  • Mcol filed on 12/02/2007 8-) acknowledged 14/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one measly offer from Mr Langdale at the LBA stage in respose to my Prelim letter then nothing... DG are rude in the two email responses I have pushed for .... Kate Eaves addressed me as MADAM! and sent me a template reply.... Not sure what they concider "Due Course" to be but for me due course has passed.....

Keep me updated, hopefully we are in teh same batch and willhear today, I have been told offers come Wed, Thur Fri in most cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello whatawoman,

 

just rang the court...allocation questionnaire still not received by court and Judge still not made order. The Clerk told me that the Judge will probably either make an unless order or move to trial date (why when they haven't received questionnare?)

 

Hears the great news DO NOT EXPECT TO HEAR ANYTHING IN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS AS THEY ARE VERY BUSY AND SHORT STAFFED.

 

oh well, I can't see DG making offer now until their hand is forced..hopefully I'm wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you manage to get any response from Kate Eaves . I have saent 2 letter by fax and an email and had absolutely no response at all. I find this sooooooooooo! rude how do you get any answers???:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only response I have had from her either by phone, fax or mail is this imersonal email response: (I don't think that customer liason is her fortee!)

 

Dear Madam

 

Your email is acknowledged and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Yours faithfully

DG SOLICITORS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I rang the court AGAIN who said that the claim was refered to a District judge on the 17th and they are waiting to hear what he will do, he may still issue an unless order, despite DG having had a further 18 days since the AQ deadline of 2nd April - this is all seems very unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi received letter from court yesterday (at last some correspondence from somebody) just saying that the judge has read the court file and it is ordered that unless by 27th April the defendant files a completed AQ the defence and any counterclaim shall be struck out without further order. The only thing is I rang court on Monday and they had just filed their AQ, so reckon these must have crossed each other. Sent another nudging letter to DG yesterday, just waiting now.

  • Preliminary letter sent 15/01/2007 received 16/01/2007 :cool:
  • LBA sent 29/01/2007 received 30/01/2007 8-)
  • Mcol filed on 12/02/2007 8-) acknowledged 14/02/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely - all along the way - they have the same deadlines (unless the judge orders differently). so, if they have filed - next letter you say - i understand you have now (instead of understand you have not) makes no difference - you still want an offer - keep writing nudges until you get one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the changes to the system have been done to try to relieve pressure from the court staff but maintain pressure on DG to make offers because the District Judges know the only way the court will get rid of us is with our money safely stuffed into our back pockets.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONCERN RE THE COURTS:

 

I rang the court again today. My AQ deadline was 2nd April, because of a shortage in District judges it didn't get passed to one till 17th April (DG had not submitted an AQ at this point). Now I am told because of a shortage in admin staff they are at least 14 days after the judge has made an order before paperork is being processed. (Surely this is just giving DG more and more and more delaying time, and if the judge issued an 'unless order' on the 17th but DG don't get the details till May sometime, can't they argue it was unfair? I am so frustrated with this whole waiting game.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judges are aware of the backlog. If they make an 'unless order' they will take account of the fact that it may take 2 weeks to type up order and add this time on. Also bank charge cases are a very low priority. According to the Clerk I spoke to staff are waiting to be given overtime to type these orders up, until then they are at the back of the queue.

 

I rang the court today and judge has made order. A court date has been set for 14th August (though the order hasn't been typed yet). This is despite the fact that HSBC didn't file AQ...Judge obviously gave them benefit of doubt.

 

Resigned to the fact that HSBC will probably ignore me until week before trial.

 

I think their strategy is to make it as difficult and frustrating as possible to claim against them and possibly make reduced offers once OFT report comes out. Does anyone know when this is due? I thought it was to be published end of March.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...