Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello , sorry of this is in the wrong place. I have received in the post a County Court Claim claim form.  This relates to MYJAR and issued by TM Legal relating to a payday loan issued 11/2017, subsequently they issued a default notice 09/2018. The debt isnt on any credit reports.  4/4/2024 I had an email saying a Letter of claim was sent - this was not received , i replied to say I believed the debt was statue barred their response We are aware that the correspondence you have sent, is in a format that is circulated on consumer-based websites whereby debtors are encouraged to use the templates in order to avoid repayment of their debts. We do not accept that the contents of these templates bear any particular relevance to your case. For clarification, in line with the Limitations Act 1908, no claim may be brough after a period of 6 years from the cause of action. The cause of action in this instance is the Notice of Default served upon you by the original creditor on 24th September 2018. As such, the account is not Statute Barred. 10th June 2024 I have received a county court claim form and now i am unsure what to do next and how to complete and respond, I do not want a CCJ. Please help 
    • Please start your own topic in the following forum. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/121-financial-legal-issues/
    • Hello , sorry of this is in the wrong place. I have received in the post a County Court Claim claim form.  This relates to MYJAR and issued by TM Legal relating to a payday loan issued 11/2017, subsequently they issued a default notice 09/2018. The debt isnt on any credit reports.  4/4/2024 I had an email saying a Letter of claim was sent - this was not received , i replied to say I believed the debt was statue barred their response We are aware that the correspondence you have sent, is in a format that is circulated on consumer-based websites whereby debtors are encouraged to use the templates in order to avoid repayment of their debts. We do not accept that the contents of these templates bear any particular relevance to your case. For clarification, in line with the Limitations Act 1908, no claim may be brough after a period of 6 years from the cause of action. The cause of action in this instance is the Notice of Default served upon you by the original creditor on 24th September 2018. As such, the account is not Statute Barred. 10th June 2024 I have received a county court claim form and now i am unsure what to do next and how to complete and respond, I do not want a CCJ. Please help 
    • Do you want to shake your groove thing but don’t know any steps? Even dad dancing beyond you? Then order ‘Dancing with The Don’ and let Felon Trump teach you all the 'hottest moves Starring classic moves like: whackamole a child, flossing your nostrils, shaking the cell bars, and pointy pointing    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mbna Nightmare!!!!


Cornucopia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ahhhh, you change your story now in the cold light of day. You said it takes an hour and a half...... now only 40 minutes. I put it to you, your honour, that you are attempting to spin your story out of the rubbish you originally posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

my objective, m'lud was to attempt to explain to the defendant that indeed, from where I reside, I can be in France and almost to Belgium in one and a half hours, whereas, it would take me a considerably lengthier period to reach the Italian border.

We now of course have witten evidence to prove that the defendant is in the habit of exceeding legal speed limits, and thus his journey to Italy may well indeed, be quicker than one I would undertake. Notwithstanding these new facts that have now come to light, I would still put to the court that the defendant would have difficulty in reaching the Italian border in one and a half hours.Particularly given his penchant for recycling the detritus that emanates from his keyboard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the forgery very carefully. Check how the name and address have been written, check for any telltale printing version numbers to see what the actual date of the card mailer is and then look to see what the interest rate and penalty charges are on the card mailer. Check these against your statements and then tell WW to wipe his arse on it as he is not allowed to use 'constructive conjecture' (i.e. fraud).

 

Sorry about the arse there, I was just remembering how P'd I was when I received it!

 

Arse away hun! Now can you two stop arguing and listen to me!!!

 

Hi M, it is difficult to say anything about this really, there is a small reference on one of the pages of T&C's that says AACG 12/03 (this card was taken out in 96, I am only guessing that this is a date reference), there is also a reference code on the application form and the "credit agreement", without giving too much away, the number match except for the last two, the application ends with 32, the "agreement" ends with 22. I seriously think they have cut and suffled somebody else's agreement here and tried to pass it of as Mr Corn's.

 

I think I will write and say that this is an obvious forgery, ask them to explain why they have blanked out certain pieces of information when it is supposed to be Mr Corn's agreement and why it has been done in such an amateur fashion. Also, where are the signatures that are both supposed to be there?

 

M, could you email me with how you have dealt with this, I would be very grateful for some pointers, I am hopping mad.

 

Of course, I have no statements to compare any of it to because they will not comply with my SAR (although hopefully that will be resolved as I have filed at CC).

 

Thanks for help hun, I need some soothing of my furrowed brow!!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stan, let me make it quite clear, and I CAN understand why you are thinking this way - although displaying very obvious signs to the contrary, my friend Cornypoker has, at this stage, NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do wtih Alcoholic Anonymous. Nor to my knowledge has her car broken down. So I'm afraid film title will need amendment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Corny Whistleblower, Blows MBNA Away

 

LOL! You lot are mad!!!

 

Stan, I am going to have to ring you tomorrow, I am SO late, have got to get ready to go out and it's all gone pearshaped this afternoon, hope you don't mind!!

 

xxxx

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GOING OUT??!! you hussy - I DO hope Mr. Corn is not still away.

 

LOL!! Yes I AM!!! Mr Corn has come back tonight so will have some peace on his own. I am going out with the girls!!! A rare event!

 

Oh and tomorrow night, I am going to The Ivy!!!!:D

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL!! Yes I AM!!! Mr Corn has come back tonight so will have some peace on his own. I am going out with the girls!!! A rare event!

 

Oh and tomorrow night, I am going to The Ivy!!!!:D

 

Must point out though that I am not paying the bill, it's a birthday party! Thank God, couldn't possibly afford that!!!!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh you WAG/Chav/name dropper!!

It's lovely, and I know this sounds really stupid, but their shepherds pie is stupendous. And you may even get wilted spinach with it! So I will want to know who you spotted there.

 

LOL!!! Chav most certainly not!!! HOW RUDE!!!!:o

 

I am a proper WAG (well in Primarni terms anyway), and to husband's delight I am wearing a dress and everything!!!

 

I shall reveal all on Sunday......knowing my luck it will be Peter Stringfellow and Terry Wogan:rolleyes:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

blimey - don't fancy yours much then:wink:

 

Or yours!!!!:D

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What both at the same table? When I went there (can't be outdone y'know) I saw Eve Pollard (who?)and Jane Seymour.

Just had horrid thought that Corn is romancing Stringy in his thong. (Or Stringy in his Thingy) Marvellous!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh God Rhia I thought about the thong when Corn said that. (Leopard skin or similar was it not?)

Sets my hear a flutter - or is it a panic attack?

 

Morning peeps! As expected, the letters have started after MBNA's ridiculous attempt to provide a cut and shuffle agreement.

 

This morning we received a letter from Eversheds (the DCA's sols) as follows :

 

Dear Mr Corn,

 

We have been informed that MBNA have concluded their correspondence with you, please accept this letter as confirmation of our current position.

 

A copy of your original agreement (er, no application form), was sent by MBNA on 22 February. As Eversheds are not the original credit provider we are unable to act on any duplicated requests for the same.

 

We are aware that MBNA have strongly advised you to contact us to agree repayment of this balance. They have advised that an offer of £120.00 was submitted to them some time ago, however, as no payment was received your debt was subsequently transferred to our client (bloody cheek!! We all know what MBNA did!).

 

If you wish Eversheds LLP to consider this or any other offer of repayment we will require a completed statement of your income and expenditure as outlined in our letter to you dated blah blah.

 

If we do not receive the requested documentation or a response from you within 10 days of the date of this letter, we will recommence collections activity on this account. Our client's offer of a reduced settlement will be withdrawn and your accoutn will proceed for legal action if necessary.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Eversheds.

 

 

Comments anybody? The fact remains that Arrow Global are in default of the CCA and have not provided me with ANY information, let alone a true copy of the agreement. MBNA may think that our business is concluded, however, it is not. They have still not provided me any details of the "default" and have not responded to my Subject Access Request. They haven't even answered my last letter despite the promise of a "full response" by 23rd March.

 

Eversheds will be getting a nice letter from me on Tuesday morning telling them to sod off.

 

I would appreciate any advice!!!:-)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Tell to them get st///ed and as the matter is now subjudicea, you cannot enter into any negotiations with them, but if they persist you will name as co-respondend tinh your claim for damges and will not hesitate to ask the court for substantial compensation regarding harassment, threatening and intimidating correspondence.

 

Dont know how legal this suggestion is, but it's worth a try. In other words shutup and back off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...