Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, You can't make EVRi investigate something. The only thing you could potentially look to do is take EVRi to court for the value of the lost parcel, however with a value of only £25 there will be limited point to doing that.
    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are Abbey Stalling ?


irk69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wonder if anyone could help here or give some advice ?

I've filed my claim against Abbey and gone through the various stages,yesterday I received a letter from them saying that they were in the process of reviewing this claim and preparing 'our' response, and that a defence would be filed in due course.

They go on to say that I have provided no details as to how I came to to the amount of charges and that I haven't shown how, the interest charge is made up.

Now,this is utter rubbish,I have provided letters with copies of the breakdown of charges that they actually provided me with and also the corresponding 8% interest charge.Each ime I sent a letter I sent this breakdown.

They also ask for my contact details,which I have sent them ( all recorded delivery ).

So,are they merely stalling ?

Should I send a further letter,giving them this information ?

Should I ignore it and carry on planning for court ?

Any information would be very much appreciated.

I see from some of the postings that there are several people at this stage,if you could let me know how your getting on or I can help just PM me.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, procrastination strikes again.

Send them another copy of your schedule of charges with a covering note pointing out that it is the same as the ones that you have already sent them.

Send it recorded delivery, then they can't claim that they haven't received it.

Standard stuff. No need to worry.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, im not sure if i have misunderstood, but you said you had filed the claim and also that you had sent them the schedule of charges when you wrote to them.

 

If you used MCOL you need to send a schedule of charges to both the defendant and the court after the claim is issued. If you didint do this then this may be why they are cribbing.

 

The fact that you wrote to them is of little conseqeunce in legal terms.

 

HTH

 

GLenn

  • Haha 1

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Glen,

I did use MCOL and listed the charges in the particulars of the claim.

Should I send a full schedule and breakdown of all the charges and dates to the court and Abbey just to be on the safe side ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you listed the charges did you include the date each charge was applied, what the charge was for, any interest paid (again date applied to your account) and then finally the interest you are charging them (contractual interest) how this is derived?

 

Glenn

 

PS sorry if im making a mountain out of a mole hill here if you know/have done all this.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all Glen,in fact thanks for the help.

No I didn't give as detailed a breakdown as that.

So should I now send the court a detailed breakdown ( as you describe )

and a copy to Abbey ?

Can I send MCOL the breakdown online or does it have to be a hardcopy ?

Sorry to keep asking,but obviously I want to get everything spot on for the possibility of going to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karnevil,

Here are the particulars of my claim entered on MCOL.

Do you need anymore info ?

I hope I haven't messed it up ?

Thanks for the help !

 

 

 

Between 29/12/00- 23/01/03 the Defendant

applied numerous default charges to my bank

account.The charges applied constitute an

unfair penalty under the Unfair terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations,which state:A

term is unfair if it requires any consumer

who fails his obligation to pay a

disproportionately high sum in compensation.

The amount does not reflect the cost of the

breach.Under law of penalties,the charges

are an unlawful 'extravagant'penalty.

Referring to the case of 1896 Wilson v Love,

a charge is a penalty if it does not reflect

an item's true cost.Under the County Courts

Act 1984,I am entitled to interest at a

rate of 8% per annum from the date they

were first deprived of the money to the date

of this claim.This amounts to a total sum of

claim £101.45,continuing to accrue at the

statutory daily rate of 0.012% until

judgment or earlier payment.I therefore

asks the court to enter judgment in my

favour for the sum £267.29 plus interest,

amounting to a total £368.74 dates stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,I got them off MSE,and I think that this is where some of my problems have arisen,as I was recommended by a friend to use CAG,but that was after I was some way through the process.

I hope that everything is still ok with my claim,as it's a little worrying to get a reply saying you are a little concerned with the particulars of my claim.

Would you recommend that I send a copy of my charges to the Court and can I do it online or should I send a hard copy in the post ?

I will send Abbey another copy of my claim.

Once again thanks for the advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again,

I've just done my schedule ,but I found it slightly confusing .I did the simple version including the 8%,but I didn't include the interest debit I was charged by the bank,although I had included it in earlier correspondences with the Abbey.Does it matter ? I've now also completed the N1 form ready to send off to the court and to Abbey.

The figures have also come out slightly differently as well ( although that maybe because I used the one on MSE ).But I'm guessing that as I haven't sent a Schedule to the court this won't matter ?

Or am I way off ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no probs, read my previous post - we probably crossed.

 

Its not a major problem, and abbey havent yelled lack of particulars at you, so if you send the parts and schedule now it may pre-empt that move from them....as the claim is quite small I dont think its a big problem, if any, so dont worry about it.

 

I would fully concur with Karn:)

 

Use the Simple Calc from CAG and send that with your parts to MCOL in Northampton (send by Recorded Delivery) and also send a copy of both to the Abbey (also by Recorded Delivery).

 

I may have mis-understood your comment regarding "the figures are not the same this time", but if your refering to the Calc Sheet, the figure for interest will change daily as it auto updates to ensure your Daily Interest is added.

Hope this is of help

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Armsoft every reply is of help if only for encouragement.

The figures are slightly different,but I don't think it's just down to the daily interest.I think it may have something to do with me intially using MSE calculator.

I'm going to put the same figures in their calculator and see if they come out the same.

Think I've solved it,I was using the compound interest instead of Simple version No1 Throughout claim with contractual interest.

 

Just bear with me,I getting it sorted at last !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I`m at the court stage with Abbey. I`ve filed my claim and they`ve filed a defence. I now have the court questionairre to return by 9/01/07. Getting abit scared now, what if I`m the first person to loose????!!!!!

Is antone else at the same stage??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nikki,

I read through the forum quite a lot of late and I get the impression that Abbey are the Bank taking these claims the furthest.Having said that they haven't as yet won anything and I don't see that changing.With regard going to court,the best thing I can say is just be fully prepared,have all your documentation ready,copies,dates etc and go through the court bundle here on CAG it looks extremely comprehensive.

I think with that kind of preparation,even if you go to court I couldn't see you losing !

Keep me posted on how you get on.Remeber there are alot of people in the same boat and also there's alot of help here !

After I send my revised schedule of charges and copies on the N1 document I fully expect to be in a similar position to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nikki, You are slightly ahead of me. I filed my court claim last week. Abbey have until the 15th to acknowledge. Yes, Abbey are running those cases to the wire. How much is your claim for?. I have posted a question on the forum today regarding the AQ and a draft order for directions. This is regarding disclosure of Abbey's costing structures which a Judge can request. Can speed up the case and resulting payout.

 

It all gets a bit complicated from now in but keep talking to others on the forum and the Moderators will help with the legal stuff. I am reading AND READING lots of the cases ahead of me to pick up tips.

 

Good luck,

 

Cross1217

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cross

 

Yes it is getting abit confusing now but I`m plodding on. My claim in total is for £5313. How about you?

 

Idefinately couldn`t have done it without this site and will definately be making a donation when it all comes good.

 

Good luck to you too :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...