Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TKMAXX Clothes Swap Fraud


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 166 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Guys,

I am new here and just curious to understand under which situation I have got myself into? What can happen and because this is just early can I save myself?

I have been shopping from tkmaxx for about 5 years now initially I didn’t develop this habit but I was provoked or instigated by once incident lately.

Whenever I go for shopping I always purchase a good amount of clothes for friends family and my staff. One day I bought a jacket for a birthday present and it was having issue so because it was gift I removed the tag and then when I gifted it to the person he told me about the slit, I took this to tkmaxx with receipt and no tag I had a very long conversation and finally I was denied and lost the argument for a sum of £59.99

This went into my nerve and from then I used to return items that I bought always from tkmaxx but of same purchase with different tags and have never been questioned or flagged to my surprise I haven’t been caught even after returning items I have given them true address true name at some instance and false address and false name at some instance.

I usually use four or 5 different outlets near my address and do purchase with cash and card as well.

My query is will they give my details to police to come to my address or this usually flags and gets caught in Tkmaxx store because I have stopped going to the store since a month and not going there as I have felt bit guilty and my inner soul has taken the revenge.

I never though my deed would be called a very big fraud or an organised crime and it just came to light when I went through a post of a lady doing £500000 crime with them and I digged to see what else can be the consequence.

Please guide and help. This is genuine question because I have stopped conning them now and have banned self from visiting them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you know in your mind where this could end up. You may have got away with your 'revenge' against TK Maxx but if you carry on then this will catch up with you.

I suggest you stop playing games and do your shopping normally.

If you think there is a psychological reason for your doing this, then please talk to your GP and ask them to get you some support.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still wondering if they have collected any evidence against me and given it to cops or anything, because if they have then I should have been caught or they are waiting for me to do it again however that won’t be the case I am never going there.

I have came across questions where they say I have been caught or arrested 

my question here was they come to house or this happens at TKMaxx?

Honestly after revenge I feel bit guilty.

Yes I think I should consult my gp,

am I sick?

I am confused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have came across questions where they say I have been caught or arrested so my question here was they come to house or this happens at TKMaxx?

I'm not sure what the first part of your question means. For the second part, I don't think we've ever seen the police turn up at someone's house after the event. On the very rare occasions they've been called, it's been to the shop.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing will nor can now happen regarding the price tag swapping and refunding. its a well know things. lots of stories here.

but you seriously need to address the real reason why you carried out these acts.

seek medical help.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...