Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lending Stream failed to send Notice of Sums in Arrears - 5 Loans now IRL Complaint.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

I failed to pay a loan with Lending Stream this year.

The debt has now been passed to a debt recovery agency.

Up until now I have been ignoring all communication from them although I will probably agree to pay it up at one point in the near future.

However I received this e-mail from Lending Stream this week.

 

Quote
 
Important information about your loan
We’re writing to provide you with an important update regarding your loan reference ******* which is currently being managed by Credit Resource Solutions Ltd.
What happened?
 
Due to an error, when we wrote to you by email on **-**-2023 to tell you that your account was 60 days in arrears, our email was missing the link to a formal notification that we’re required to provide to you which is called a Notice of Sums in Arrears. We’re sorry about that.
What does this mean?
 
Because we didn’t provide this formal notice to you, it meant that we shouldn't have added any interest or fees to your account from the date that we should have sent the formal notice to you until the date when we fixed the error.
How will we correct this? 
 
To put things right we’ve updated your outstanding loan balance by £*** to remove all interest and fees that were applied during this period. Your new loan balance is £***.
 
We’ve also included a link to the formal Notice of Sums in Arrears that we should have sent you at the time.
 
This notice does not reflect the current position of your loan and is for your information only. You can access this notice by entering the password which is your date of birth in the format DDMMYYYY. For example, if your date of birth is 11th June 1982, then your password would be 11061982.
What do you need to do?
 
You don’t need to do anything as we’ve already given your new loan balance to Credit Resource Solutions Ltd.

 

I am just wondering if there is any way out of this debt now due to them failing to comply with this?

I would guess not but I know a lot of people are well clued up on these kind of things on here so thought it would be worth asking.

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

no as it only a short term error.

was your credit file clean with no defaults late payments or court judgements when they loaned to you?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have four defaults showing on my credit report.

They were defaulted Feb 2019, 2 in March 2018 and one in April 2018.

I did have a court judgement relating to one of these defaults although I don't seem to see that in my credit report although I do still have the evidence of this happening.

I have since settled that debt.

I do also have a couple of late payments on my report.

The Lending Stream loan was taken out in June this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.. might be an irresponsible lending claim here i think:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks dx.

I have sent a letter complaining about irresponsible lending now.

I also sent copies of bank statements in the months leading up to the loans being accepted.

They gave me 5 loans over a 7 month period for about £2000.

In the months leading up to the loans there were some months which had over 50 transactions relating to online betting websites. As well as that there is various transactions showing I had various other loans and credit cards at the time. I think I should have a right to claim here.

As well as that I currently have another payday type loan which I am currently trying to pay off.

This one was also given to me whilst my bank statements show the same scenario (other loans, credit cards, high number of betting transactions).

This one is slightly different though as I granted open banking access to the company before they approved the loan.

This would’ve shown all the things I have mentioned.

Do I have a case to complain with them as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new topic on this new one please

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I’ve received a response from Lending Stream which has been sent via pdf.

What’s the easiest way to redact before uploading for opinion?

I have attached the response letter.

It seems like a pretty weak response in my opinion.

On the wages part, they never asked for any pay slip.

They also never once asked for any bank statements.

The wages they claim I said I was earning, I have never earned.

As I said earlier, In the months leading up to the loans there were some months which had over 50 transactions relating to online betting websites.

As well as that there is various transactions showing I had various other loans and credit cards at the time.

If I have not removed enough info from the pdf or have not done it correctly please let me know.

Any help appreciated

Final Response Letter 1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lending Stream failed to send Notice of Sums in Arrears - 5 Loans now IRL Complaint.

it seems like as you gave them access to your bank statements in the 1st place when applying?, this time they appear to have all the cards.

the only think that springs to mind is the continuing rolling of one PDL into the next? using one to pay off the balance of the last?

was this the case?

i notice we've not advised sending an SAR.

they could be withholding important info.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/01/2024 at 12:57, DA11 said:

I also sent copies of bank statements in the months leading up to the loans being accepted.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry what I meant by that is when I wrote the irresponsible lending complaint, I included copies of my bank statements for the months which were leading up to the loans being accepted.

This was to show how many betting transactions were involved.

They did not have any bank statements or banking access before any loan was accepted.

I included them in my complaint to emphasise the irresponsible lending part.

Does that make sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so how did they do this then

Quote

Your regular expenses:
We asked what you regularly spent on rent, utilities, food, transport, dependent care, etc.

We checked what you told us with information from independent sources.

These sources collect statistics related to the economy, population and society.

They look at how much people with different levels of income typically spend.

If required, we used this information to adjust your expenses upwards, and use these new figures in our calculations.

This helped us take a sensible view of your finances before making any decisions

you must have completed some sort of I&E sheet for each Loan?

if so, there was little point in the IRL complaint sadly. i know these PDL make mistakes but with that kind of info each time, they dont.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When applying for the loans they ask for monthly outgoings. 

I was under the impression that as they did not ask for any wage slip or bank statements or Open Banking access then there could be a claim for irresponsible lending.

I read the irresponsible lending guide you posted.

I could have put any numbers in the incoming/expenditure part of the application and they have done nothing to verify it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...