Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EVRI Claim Criteria


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been looking for similar posts regarding EVRI and my situation and can't see anything similar so any help would be appreciated.

I sold 4 pairs of trainers on Stock X, paid for the shipping and insured them to the value of the items sold. 

I dropped off the parcels and received the EVRI receipt as per usual.

Checked tracking a week later as I had a chase up email from Stock X regarding one of the buyers not receiving their item, tracking on item hadn't moved from pick up shop since drop off.

I checked the other 3 and same issue no movement.

Contacted EVRI and after some back and forward emails was asked to submit a claim for all 4, I submitted the claim forms and the stock x sales receipt showing value, address of buyer etc as per their claims form requirements.

A few weeks later contacted by a claims manager Ian who said I needed to supply the original receipts for the items as the claim would not be accepted otherwise and the claim would be paid at the RRP value of the purchases.

I said this was not in their terms that I could see and had no relevance on my sale and subsequent booking as I insured the items as their sold value not their original RRP

I was told without this they would not be paying out on the loss of my parcels

He went on to cite an example - a pair of trainers I bought from a retailer a few years ago for £150 that have increased in value and are now worth £400 would only be paid out to £150 as per my original receipt.

I have no idea of the legality of this but it seems madness as my bookings were based on sold prices not what I paid originally that how reselling works

I also enquired whether the pair I sold for £250 but paid £320 for would be paid at the higher rate and I was told no as they were insured for £250, makes zero sense and I imagine ultimately I am going to have to take this to small claims based on others experiences on this forum.

I have supplied the original invoices/receipts for 3 of the items as that all I could find receipt wise as some dated back over 5 years ago but its been silent from the claims team for 5 weeks now.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please read up lots of the stories that we have on the sub forum about this delivery company.

I mean lots which will probably take you at least two or three days.

Monitor this thread for a further reply later on today or tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

As advised above, you will need to start of reading lots of the stories on this sub- forum. Not only about EVRi but about all the delivery companies. You may not find a direct parallel with your own circumstances but the principles will be the same and will be repeated and repeated in the various stories.

The second thing to understand is that we always managed to force them to pay out the money. However you will have to be persistent about it and it takes time because one of the methods that EVRi try to scam you is to try and reduce your will and to fatigue you. This is not only to try and frustrate your claim but also so that others who may be less resilient will give up rather than face it.

If you read up on the stories on this sub- forum you will soon understand firstly that the insurance which you paid out is unnecessary and unenforceable. It is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act and it is contrary to section 72 because it is a secondary contract intended to reinforce the limitation of liability contrary to section 57.

All technical stuff – but not very difficult – but just so you know.

As far as we're concerned, you will be able to recover the declared value of your lost or stolen items. It depends on the been properly declared in terms of the identity of the item and its value.

Please can you give us the date that they were sent, the date that they were considered lost.

Were they correctly declared and was the value correctly declared.

I understand that there were four separate consignments – presumably sent out under four different tracking numbers – so we can say that they were four different contracts.

They were all sent at the same time and I think we can say that it is beyond doubt that they were stolen.

Please list out the value of each parcel.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...