Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Opos “Kamama/mini credit” chasing statute barred


Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

in 2012 I took out a mini credit loan for £300. I paid back some but not all. The last payment was in 2013. I’ve not heard anything since and not acknowledged it since 2013 so it’s definately statue barred. 
 

I've since remarried and moved house and last year Opos sent me a letter trying to recover the debt.

Since then they’ve sent two more letters, the most recent is offering to settle for a reduced amount of £54 which I’m not going to pay as it’s statute barred


I don’t wish to correspond with them and certainly don’t want them having my details (my new name) and I know if I send a letter saying statue barred they’ll want evidence of my name change.

I’m not prepared to let them have my data or send them any of my personal documents. 


I am concerned they’ll take it to court though and I’ll get a CCJ even though they don’t even have my real name now. 


I hate using my old name, it’s my ex husbands name and it brings back horrible memories so I’m not prepared to correspond with them using my old name either. 
 

Should I just ignore them? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best not to ignore them but to send them a statute barred letter to protect yourself from getting a back door CCJ which will then cause you lots more problems

Link to post
Share on other sites

just send them our SB letter making ref to their debt number

and the original creditor credit type and org number 

changed of name really means nothing once SB'd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with @dx100uk

I can confirm that the Minicredit loans are all SB if you havent made a payment in the last 6 years, Their purchase of the Loan book was over 6 years okay. 

Make sure they have your correct address. Also triple check you havent made a payment to them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wont be registered with a CRA anymore as it will have expired 6 years after the default date etc :) 

Follow the advice here and Im sure they will back off. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, dx100uk said:

just send them our SB letter making ref to their debt number

and the original creditor credit type and org number 

changed of name really means nothing once SB'd

without fail

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...