Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, jk. I just find that nobody receives OOC now, and the letter said I could contact him if he can assist me further. So I’d like to send them another begging letter to show that I indeed realised my mistake. Isn’t this a good choice?
    • Yes you should wait a bit to see what they do next. next move is theirs for now imo
    • Thanks for the advice. dx. Would it be better to wait rather than send another begging letter?
    • I had a sudden thought and went back to your NTH. There, they said that they had included all the necessary documents required for Hirers so you didn't chase NPE via the ICO for this thread.  So was it the St Thomas's hospital one or another thread that it happened.
    • Same company that tried to get us to pay 6 months worth of Utility bills after we had already moved out of that home. Turns out they just searched the phone book for the name of the previous tenant (us) and decided to threaten us, because why not! British gas were useless and it took a S.A.R  and 4 separate live chats to get them to stop the threats. I advise you do not deal with BWI at all and completely ignore them (unless they send a letter of claim, which they won't). NEVER call them, the number is premium. Go via british gas only. Get them to confirm in writing that you do not not owe them anything, and get them to stop BWI letters. It will probably take multiple attempts. Finally stop worrying here and now. You paid your bills, this debt is not yours, and there is no entity in this world who can make you pay what you do not owe. This is nothing but a mistake by incompetent and greedy BG and their idiotic DCA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arrows and OH's old Tesco Card Debt - no hard copy of default notice?


marco23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

the wife had a credit card with Tesco finance of which she failed to make payments on, This around 8 years back, If i remember correct 

Arrow had bought the debt and Moorcroft had negotiated a repayment plan which she maintained over a few years,

Around 4 years ago i on her behalf sent Arrow a prove it letter and they put the account into dispute and suspended the repayment plan

following this they sent a bundle of stuff credit agreement etc,

At the time i had a freind in finance 'sadly no longer with us' who looked through the enclosed paperwork and he came to the conclusion the debt was unenforceable due to there being no hard copy of the default notice and in his words- should you (Arrow) find the hard copy the debt would remain unenforceable as the paperwork has to be given in a prescribed way,

The letter went off to Arrow and nothing from them in 4 years until last week a letter came advising the debt had been assigned to another DCA.

Im wondering the best course of action should this new DCA start collection attempts,

will the new DCA know the debt has been challenged or will it just assume  its one that needs chasing  up,

The debt will become SB in 18 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows and OH's old Tesco Card Debt - no hard copy of default notice?

capquest are still part of the arrows group.....??

or is this resolvecall wanting to collect her doorstep..

.or even dryden fairfax their own internal solicitors...next letter will be a latter of claim that you do not ignore (shame you sent that silly prove it letter..that died 10yrs ago)

i expect they've not sold the debt as you've not received a notice of assignment. so its gone nowhere nothing needs doing..

as for the DN, they dont have to physically send it , just prove one was sent.

but that doesnt mean you start paying again...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning, This is from their recent letter-

As Arrow poplar designated activity company own all interest and rights to the credit agreement, they have appointed CAPQUEST Limited as an administer

Also a letter from capquest included to confirm change of ownership of account.

May chuck some light on things should anyone wish to comment

Link to post
Share on other sites

has she moved since taking this out or last informing tescos of her correct address?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good

you dont need to do anything then. yours is not the next move

simply ignore everything until/unless they get drydens to send a letter of claim with a reply pack wanting I&E etc.

then comeback here.

when was her last use or payment and

what is the date of the default notice or registered defaulted date that was on her credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not to sure of the default date, Nothing adverse has been on her file for a couple of years,

The debt will become SB in 18 months so winding the clock back takes it to around Feb 2019 when the repayment agreement to Moorcroft was terminated by ourselves and no contact since,

at a guess i'd say she was paying Moorcroft for 4 years so the DN was likely served around December 2015 possibly longer

Many thanks for your input DX

Edited by dx100uk
unneccessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

good so last payment date +6yrs will be SB date.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes from the moorcroft final payment which 'just checked' was jan 15th Jan 2019,

So SB around 15th Jan 25 if calculations are correct,

Think its just a waiting game now

, Il ignore anything that comes in the post unless it falls into the hands of Drydens as you mention above on the thread

Once again many thanks for your input

Edited by dx100uk
unneccessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

just type NO NEED TO KEEP HITTING QUOTE!!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, just going back with regards to the DN, i have just found a coppy of the letter sent to Arrow which my freind had drafted and it looks like his argument that suggests the debt is unenforceable is due to the DN was not issued in a prescribed  form. i take it that would be the wording?, would this be enough to make a debt unenforceable ?

if you want to read the ful letter let me know and il put it up over the weekend

Edited by marco23
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes please, 

unless important wording is MISSING the prescribed format argument went out the window 10+yrs ago, and even then it was flaky at best.

i will guess he was reading a very old post/thread/site.?

silly idea to enter into any pointless letter tennis always!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...