Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

eBay refunded international buyer claiming phone did not arrive - now DRS DCA chasing me for neg balance


sprouting
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 259 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

It's been a while since I logged on to this so I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place. 

Last November (22), I sold an I phone XR on eBay (my phone that I had and looked after for five whole years).  I'm no mega seller on there but I'm no stranger to it, selling odds and ends I no longer want.  

It sold for £202 and I sent it off.

Three weeks later a dispute had been opened by the buyer saying the item was not as described, which I was astonished about. I asked to see photo evidence of what she was talking about and she sent two photos, just of THE BOX, not the actually phone or accessories, the box looked in perfect condition, just as I had sent it though. 

I asked again for clarification and evidence to substantiate her claim, but never heard a word back.  I had a hell of a time trying to deal with eBay as there is no easy way to raise a complaint or even get a straight answer, practically everything is automated.  They asked me if I would be willing to give her a refund, and I said no. That should have been the end of it, as far as I  was concerned.

I had sent the phone internationally although my listing did say UK Only, the listing was also marked No Returns, and the shipping was insured to it's full value.

It then transpired that eBay had refunded her on my behalf, let her keep the phone and then expected to recover the refund money from me.  I was incandescent.  I had the phone blacklisted and deleted all of my bank details and cards etc from eBay, whilst trying to get through to someone who would listen. 

I asked if they had received my complaints and they said yes but they don't do complaints so "you won't get an answer".  There was no official route for a complaint either so every time I had been contacting them about this it had been through a feedback form or anywhere with a text box, they were most unhelpful over the phone.

My account was restricted and then blocked, then I had an email from DRS saying they had been enlisted to recover the debt on eBay's behalf.  I spoke to them and told them where to go but I'm still getting emails and texts.

Am I right in thinking that as I have complained to eBay but not have an official response that the cannot pursue me for anything, until that happens? I only became aware after this that eBay will side with the buyer no matter what, and I agreed to these terms when I signed up.  In 16 years with eBay I have never had anything like this happen, and I can't believe it.

I decided to write once more, by post to their head office and rand to ask if they would allow me back into my account to retrieve all for the details for the issue, dates and so on. They said no, they wouldn't do that,

then I submitted a SAR which should give me the relevant information I need to pursue this.  On 31st March I got an email from them to say my SAR was ready and a code would be posted to me in order to open the document, I should have it within 5 days.

I moved house three years ago rang them to double check they had the right address on file and they wouldn't give me the address, but she asked me where I lived and then confirmed that that was the address they have. 

She was lying, because, 12 days later, I have still not received any code.  And she said she didn't have any record of an email about an SAR and told me not to open it.  Their departments clearly don't communicate. 

On closer inspection, I've noticed that the DRS people have got my old address too (although I did give them my correct address when I spoke to them on the phone). The SAR will expire at the end of the month, eBay chat is unavailable, please try later...., I'm trying to use chat now so I can have a transcript of what has been said.

I have been in touch with the Ombudsmen, who as I suspected, don't regulate eBay but they suggested another ADR but I'm not sure ow to go about this.

This has been rather long winded, I'm sorry, but if anyone has any advice about where I stand in regards to the debt collectors pursuing me when the original complaint has no been concluded, I would be extremely grateful. 

I have just come out of a DRO and do not want to end up with a CCJ for this over £200,  and I know I am in the right, morally if nothing else. I do not want to back down.

Thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore stuff and all anyone can do to you.

and stop using the ruddy phone!!

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Who?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that it was sent internationally. Did you send direct to the buyer or use eBay's GSP service where you send to a UK hub and they forward it on.

You may actually have some cover if you sent it to their hub as you could argue the "issue" (although I suspect this is just a common eBay scammer,) occurred in transit from GSP Hub to the buyer and at that point it would be eBay that would of had to refund the buyer and if the buyer was stating the box was empty eBay will actually have details of the parcel ie the weight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Unfortunately I sent it directly to them.  I have been chasing the SAR from eBay which yhey are happy to do, but it will not contain any information regarding the issue.  I don't know what to do next.  I can't believe that even though the listing said 'no returns' on it, they have the cheek to ignore all of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/04/2023 at 20:21, dx100uk said:

ignore stuff and all anyone can do to you.

and stop using the ruddy phone!!

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to eBay refunded international buyer claiming phone did not arrive - now DRS DCA chasing me for neg balance
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...